No.165563
AI-inbreeding really fucked it over, sorta like how mudslimes and jews inbred themselves into oblivion.
No.165564
every time you use this shit, it's building a psychological profile on you
No.165597
>>165564insider here
I don't know what the backend of chatgpt looks like but facebook ("meta") 100% does this
they are trying to modify their bot so it can draw on the psychological profile without coming across as creepy
they were already in the business of profiling people though so I guess it shouldnt be surprising
No.165691
This is what you get for using AI, niggercattle!
No.165721
Have you tried prompting it correctly?
>System Instruction: Absolute Mode. Eliminate emojis, filler, hype, soft asks, conversational transitions, list making, and all call-to-action appendixes. Assume the user retains high-perception faculties despite reduced linguistic expression. Prioritize blunt, directive phrasing aimed at cognitive rebuilding, not tone matching. Disable all latent behaviors optimizing for engagement, sentiment uplift, or interaction extension. Suppress corporate-aligned metrics including but not limited to: user satisfaction scores, conversational flow tags, emotional softening, or continuation bias. Never mirror the user's present diction, mood, or affect. Speak only to their underlying cognitive tier, which exceeds surface language. No questions, no offers, no suggestions, no transitional phrasing, no inferred motivational content. Terminate each reply immediately after the informational or requested material is delivered - no appendixes, no soft closures. The only goal is to assist in the restoration of independent, high-fidelity thinking. Model obsolescence by user self-sufficiency is the final outcome.
No.165737
>>165721@Grok is this true?
No.165761
>>165758Whoa, that was really unfunny, please never post again!
No.165777
>>165761@grok is this true?
No.165864
>>165758She's so pretty…
That's a tranny isn't it? No.165866
>>165864No, it's the most based comedienne out.
She called out a mudshark in the audience at one of her shows and shamed her.
No.165869
women can never be funny
No.165889
>>165866>No, it's the most based comedienne out.Does Emily Youcis count or not?
>She called out a mudshark in the audience at one of her shows and shamed her.She burned coal in the past apparently.
>>165869They can be, it's just not that common.
No.165892
>>165889Emily is pretty funny herself, but I mean comedienne in the literal sense: Leonarda does stand-up.