[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top ]

/dup/ - btfo

Political Shitposting
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1637954546241.jpg (165.21 KB, 816x1028, 204:257, 1637953736841.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

 No.94290[Last 50 Posts]

Is Christianity an exhausted religion? is it over?


Eastern Orthodox is based, pr*testant and r*mans are cringe especially the latter when the leader is a liberation theology commie


File: 1637955494549.jpg (119.43 KB, 687x1024, 687:1024, 1637954726870.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb


File: 1637959687300.png (272.17 KB, 829x633, 829:633, 1440123406612.png) ImgOps iqdb

>ywn purge the kikes and muslims from Europa


They burned it down just to do this. I never got to visit it when I was over there, Christ.


>found your religion by burning down pagan religious sites
>thousands of years later
>this is what has become of you
lol karma


Still butthurt?


File: 1637965302227.jpg (106.18 KB, 800x494, 400:247, pagan((((shrine))))).JPG) ImgOps Exif iqdb

Oh dear, look at this example of a surviving pagan religious site…. how dare those bigot cuckstians tear these beautiful creations down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


lmao nice dying religion, Christards :^))))


lolk Paul


File: 1637977135234.png (274.22 KB, 591x669, 197:223, 1637373305752.png) ImgOps iqdb

No, they're all shit. Orthodox faggots disown right-wingers just like any other religious sect nowadays. Look at what happened to Matt Heimbach. Yeah, he's a faggot, but he was only targeted for being "racist."
What do you call the Greco-Roman world that Christianity piggybacked off the success of? Were they not pagans?


Polytheism and animism are two different things. When most people think paganism they think of animists, the wildmen of the woods and waters with the deer antlers on their heads.


Weren't the pagans vegans?


Even worse, they were milkdrinkers whomst danced too close to the fire.


this is 100% subversion. fuck you


I too worship marvel superheroes my brother,
Hail Odin!


this is subversion too.
the >"muh astru!!" meme is a kike meme


Shut the fuck up kike, you will never be a real Godhead.


File: 1637993606458.png (526.1 KB, 680x960, 17:24, e806a55d5382fcb98c96aa8ac7….png) ImgOps iqdb

Yea im thinking Christianity is based and p*ganism is cringe


Baste cuckime christian tranny brigade


File: 1637995094527.jpg (309.05 KB, 650x784, 325:392, cb12cfce2714851f2250bf044a….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb


>Regardless of who you are and what you believe, you must reject all societal apparatus of this modern era. "Paganism" is just as perverted as Christianity today.
I don't necessarily disagree. The question of poz aside, I don't even think either neopaganism or Christianity are viable belief systems in the first place in this day and age. Neopaganism is too LARPy, and Christianity fucked up from the start by basing itself around having faith in the improbable instead of being more of a cultural thing like Hinduism or International Frugalism are. Hindus and Jews can question their traditional religious dogmas all they want, and their coreligionists don't care that much because they know they're ultimately on the same team.

Christianity will continue in its death throes among the majority of the public and keep focusing on converting Third Worlders, and neopaganism will continue failing to get off the ground with just about anyone who's not the religious equivalent of an Esperanto enthusiast.


Naw Christianity will continue to evolve into new sects and these groups will change the religion in their own satanic ways. When the colonists came to the us during the enlightenment ppl were saying Christianity was dying but instead you had evangelical protestant sects popping up like with niggers and folk dance and such. They are viable religions at the core but normalniggers pozzed them up due to a lack of strong right wing leadership, and what you have left is leftist gay nigger versions of today. Additionally when these libtards grow older they become more conservative in their views with age, its how you had the hippie boomer generation turn into neocons and "judeo christians". There is still some hope with a good chunk of zoomers not being leftist and can recognize the pozz in modern religion but until you have actual leadership, that are not cuckservative grifters who want you to support israel, nothing will change.


Is there any hard evidence of this? I thought pagans, the OG not the faggots nowadays, had a lot of religious significance on animal sacrifice. Not to mention most of the early Humans were hunter gatherers and ate what they could and not selective in their meals.


No, what the breeks and romans had was not animist but still polytheistic. Its a much more mature and evolved form of polytheism. They didnt have "river spirit number 243" or "tree spirit number 400".


IIRC there was some higherup of the orthodox church saying that refusing the vaccine was a sin. They're all pozzed.


I don't fucking understand Christians. You are not allowed to worship things of this world or you're a pagan, but if you worship too much of the spiritual plane you're labelled a gnostic. Walking a fine line lest they satiate their desire for inquisitional punishment with you.


>We don't like LGTB
<But we're not filled with hate like trumptards
<I believe my son must mutilate himself because God can't do mistakes
This is why christians earned the nickname: "christcuck".


Hi varg. See you at the LARP sesh tonight. I'll bring the "potions" wink wink


>You are not allowed to worship things of this world or you're a pagan
89iq post, Christians can experience miracles of the world and give thanks to God for them. If say a miracle or apparition occurred at a spot, then that place would become a shrine or holy spot and millions of people would go there, sames holds true for artifacts.


>They are viable religions at the core but normalniggers pozzed them up due to a lack of strong right wing leadership
It's not even just about values but whether the claims a given religion teaches about the world and the nature of existence are true. The Abrahamic religions at their core aren't viable these days unless you're willing to overlook the numerous errors their holy books contain and the fact that they're really based on nothing but ancient rumors and traditions with little to back them up. There's a reason so many seminary students end up having crises of faith once they start learning more about their religion.

Religion is a tool for strengthening social bonds and building social capital, but it's also much more than that.
>but if you worship too much of the spiritual plane you're labelled a gnostic
I don't think I've seen them do that before. But they do have a crab bucket mentality with people who delve into occultism and deeper spiritual practices than what they're willing to provide.

I do think there should be a line between putting all your emphasis on worldly life and rejecting it completely in favor of the otherworldly. Materialists are guilty of the former, and Gnostics and Buddhists are guilty of the latter. Otherworldly Christians can be the worst of both types, since they reject the good and enjoyable aspects of this world while also basing their all-important "spiritual" prep work for the afterlife on little else but blind belief in ancient stories. At least the followers of Catholicism and the Orthodox churches emphasize good works over sola fide, but still.

The Hermetic approach seems to me to be the sweet spot. The Gnostics saw this existence as being evil, but the Hermeticists saw it as being an emanation of the Absolute that has its place in the cosmic order even if there are much more desirable places to be.
He's not wrong. Nietzsche famously criticized Christianity for its world-denying nature that sees earthly life as little more than a test for admittance into heaven. There's a reason so many Christians use "worldly" as a pejorative term.


Try not to. They are walking contradictions who don't really follow the teachings of Christ and they fucking hate it when you point this out. Like a rich christian being an oxymoron and missing the point entirely.


ok fedora


>le abrahamic religions
>muh neetschze
>muh gnostics
Now I know your underage and sound like a middle schooler stuck in le atheist faze. Grow up kid.


You are low IQ.


>"Foreign visitors see signs and magnificent paintings but don't understand a thing. Images and sculptures and paintings count but so do words. So there are plans to project on certain words and expressions in Mandarin, French or Spanish and English."


File: 1638062444219.jpg (52.12 KB, 780x600, 13:10, circular_reasoning_bible.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

You must be Christian.
I see you're a mongoloid who can't even address anything I've said.


Guys are still doing the LARPagan posturing on the right in 2021?


File: 1638062855583.jpg (590.51 KB, 700x6826, 350:3413, proofofgod.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

Same tired old arguments from the LARPagan corner. Try refuting this.


File: 1638063867339.jpg (1.91 MB, 2883x3460, 2883:3460, 1383852903770.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

It's mostly something Christians like accusing people who disagree with them of being.
>here are some reasons there must be a higher force
>therefore GodJesus


File: 1638064020362-0.jpg (184.11 KB, 700x2048, 175:512, kikeonastick2.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1638064020362-1.png (128.47 KB, 881x703, 881:703, kikel.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1638064020362-2.jpg (954.29 KB, 900x3186, 50:177, kikeonastick.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>here are some out of context interpretations of text from the bible
>therefore muh Christianity is bad


Just so you know, even Varg doesn't believe in "pagan" gods, while understanding that pagans back in the day indeed did. For him paganism is a kind of cultural bildungsroman. His beef with Christianity is "turn the other cheek" and "love thy enemy," understandably as I too hate those lines though I am a Christian.
Should a Christian love a muslim? No. Even the Bible has a few screwups. This is why I fucking hate Jehova's Witnesses, "Christmas doesn't exist, it's not in the bible."
There is a good reason why Masses and the Bible were kept in Latin. The average human is a moron and if you give them an inch they'll take a mile, being the corrupt creatures they are, and some races more corrupt than others.


File: 1638064262841.jpg (145.89 KB, 842x1225, 842:1225, fccc4fad2fe48de80ecc457a6b….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

watch out Christbros we got a fedora tipper on the loose


File: 1638064341579.png (9.94 KB, 326x383, 326:383, 1372769708381.png) ImgOps iqdb

>being this obvious about trying to sidestep the massive amount of contradictions in the Bible
Tell me: how did Judas die?


File: 1638064662678.jpg (48.5 KB, 480x640, 3:4, 3217893289171.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>varg I did it!!!
>time to go worship my marvel superheroes and buy their funkopops!!


File: 1638065965653.png (300.59 KB, 800x800, 1:1, a67c0167415a5c57d83f38a84c….png) ImgOps iqdb

Also, whoever made that third image was retarded window licker.
>Their religion was called "Talmudism".Jesus denounced the Pharisees and their Talmud.
"Talmudism" is just a derogatory term for rabbinic Judaism, and the Talmud wasn't even around at the time of Jesus. The first part of the Talmud wasn't put together until the beginning of the 3rd century. Rabbinic Judaism was an outgrowth of Pharisaism, but it wasn't the same thing.

The Khazar hypothesis also isn't taken seriously by most geneticists and was invented by Arthur Koestler, a kike who thought it would undermine the racial basis of antisemitism.

No matter how much mental gymnastics you apply and red herrings you throw out, Christianity has its roots in the religion of the ancient Hebrews.
Uh oh, someone's mad.


"Turn the other cheek" and "love thy enemy" are both taken wildly out of context too, and I'm pretty sure the Bible explicitly states multiple times that wars and killing can be justified in specific scenarios, like jewish demons taking over your country and selling it to satan.


File: 1638069442814.mp4 (983.75 KB, 640x778, 320:389, JesusTemple.mp4) ImgOps iqdb

Jesus has resorted to violence himself on at least a few occassions. It's pretty obvious the 'other cheek' quote that pagans love to spout is either poorly translated from the original meaning or refers to one not taking someone else's shit.


But killing is a sin.

How many guys did Jesus kill?


MURDER is a sin, killing in self defense or evil pypio is not.


The bible doesn't clarify. Where did Jesus say "and thou shalt kill thyne enemies"?


You clearly havent read the bible fedora tipper, go drink odins cum somewhere else underage faggot


That's great but where did Jesus say that it was cool to kill in self defense? How many guys did Jesus killed?


Remember when Jesus killed in self defense? I sure don't. I think he had a few enemies?


Would have been pretty cool if he had.


Don't sneed like that


It states it in the old testament the bible isnt a cover to cover account of Jesus' life on earth, stoopid. It wasnt even written by Jesus because Jesus never wrote anything down, his lessons and teachings were passed down by his followers and later theologians compiled the accounts into the Bible. You wouldnt know any of this, because you didnt read the Bible nor have you studied it,and thats why you cant even understand anything about it. Youre trying way too hard and come off as a pseudo intellectual.


"Thou shalt not kill" is just a mistranslation.


Jesus was a midlane feeder lol


Thanks. So there's a possibility Jesus was actually Rambo and killed countless jews and romans while encouraging others to do the same? Did that part get left out?

Pretty big gaffe on the translator. It was originally "Thou shalt kill in self defense".


Cringe the post


I just want to know if Jesus killed. Can't be hard to answer. I think he didn't, but I'm no bible expert.


>but I'm no bible expert
You cant even read a book?
The absolute state of fedoratippers lmao


I've read parts of it. Like a dude who lived inside a whale to escape from God which is a fact that happened.


Watch him pull a cope and say it's metaphorical, or double down.


Come back when you read the whole thing :)




I've actually heard the claim that the Jonah story was supposed to be some kind of satire or a joke. I don't know if it's true or not.


there are a minority of christians out there who say the more fantastical elements of the bible may or may not be literal truth but you shouldn't really care either way, and just grasp the philosophical aspects within the book, pretty high IQ if you ask me


But the validity of its philosophy largely rests on whether or not it's literally true. The Bible is still worth reading for its historical significance and cultural value, and Ecclesiastes is a genuinely good read.


You can take the part where it says you shouldn't steal and formulate the logic behind it in relation to individuals and society at large without having to autistically defend or attack the part where the book depicts the commandment as being literally given to Moses on a stone slab.


>kike on a stick religion
nothing of value was lost


Sure thing Moshe


That's too philosophi. Many much.


That is why I'm asking.


I believe the Bible is pure truth. There are parables in it of course.


File: 1638115406878.jpg (77.43 KB, 768x1024, 3:4, 1432968688885-1.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>first pic
>People that have accepted Jesus Christ in their heart will never join up to purge the jews


The Church will survive in some form until the second coming. Bergoglio already pretty much banned traditional mass, there will have to be some sort of correction either in the form of a new Pope after this one is gone or a large schism. I do not believe in this Pope and the whole thing with Benedict XVI stepping down was bizarre. Maybe he was sending a message about the rot and the forces of evil taking over. This has been cooking for decades. After he fucked up by bringing Vatican II, Paul VI famously said the smoke of Satan had entered the Church. The Church has been infiltrated by bad actors who want it destroyed for a while and they hold a disturbing amount of power within it.

>"… It was thought that, after the Council, sunny days would come for the history of the Church. Nevertheless, what came were days of clouds, of storms, of darkness, of searching, of uncertainty … We tried to dig abysses instead of covering them …"

This was written by Paul VI himself.
And it's been said for a long time that he was poisoned. Honestly it wouldn't surprise me, he wanted to reverse the damage at that point.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
vid related lol


File: 1638132836150.jpg (178.69 KB, 510x720, 17:24, c6db6136c8f6a67a6fe25878f4….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>Dear Lord, Jesus Christ
>I hate p*gans and j*ws


Things like not stealing and not murdering aren't some kind of special insight unique to the Bible, especially when it's predicated on the existence of a supernatural being punishing people for not toeing the line. It's not autistic to focus on whether or not the Bible is literally true or not, since even the believers who hold the belief that it's not literally true tend to do so selectively and still often believe in their idea of the God of the Bible.

You could go the Neville Goddard route and say that the whole thing is symbolic, but I highly doubt that the writers of the books that comprise the Bible intended that at all. I don't think they saw themselves as necessarily writing things that were 100% accurate in the literal sense either, but on some level it's safe to say they believed what they were writing on a more concrete level than the whole thing (Yahweh included) being symbolic or metaphorical.
Ignoring its Jewish origins, Christianity was in some ways an advancement over paganism. You didn't really have people giving to charity for its own sake before Christianity came along, for example.


I'm not devoted into your autism chamber, who the fuck is Varg? I got that copy&paste from a simple jewgle search.


>who the fuck is Varg
newfags out


>Spams /who/ at every thread possible
<Gets niggered when being questioned to his beloved retarded z-tier ecelebs
Wrong url, buddy. Special ED is 8ch.se


File: 1638141685222.png (91.55 KB, 371x353, 371:353, if you're reading this you….png) ImgOps iqdb

can you even read retard


File: 1638142423999.jpg (125.13 KB, 331x452, 331:452, santa_varg_has_a_club_wiff….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>not knowing who Varg Vikernes is
The guy's been a meme forever and was making music before you were probably even born.


lmao based Zoomer
how tf do these young Zoomers find their way here? Is Gahoole shilling the site somewhere?






Must we be wasted men?


lol based


You're the furfag Canadian and literal homo Youtuber larping as a based Orthodox?



>"turn the other cheek"
Fuck off Asston


File: 1638209473190.jpg (686.24 KB, 2424x1660, 606:415, notre-dame-2.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

Anyone got the photos of the french all depressing while seeing the church burn, but the muslims were smiling?


File: 1638238095968.png (72.09 KB, 984x868, 246:217, catholikek.png) ImgOps iqdb

>religion that thrives upon pedophilia, forced conversions and the slander of Jesus Christ
You get what you deserve. If only the whole thing burnt to the ground to finish the job.


>.t muslim


The bible ends in a total war between God and Satan. But somehow, killing is… le bad!

Understanding the bible goes far, far beyond just reading it. Failure in having a relationship with God before reading the bible invariably leads to a complete lack of understanding of what the word of God means, i.e. fedoratards who take the scriptures at face value and c*tholics who use the bible as a means to assume control over people. The latter is arguably more evil, and they will have to answer to God for their crimes.


>have a relationship with God before reading the Bible
Kys pr*testant kike. Religion is more than personal relationship with God, nigger faggots like you allowed kikes to infest and dilute the faith and introduce their own subversive degenerate beliefs.
>c*tholics who use the bible as a means to assume control over people. The latter is arguably more evil, and they will have to answer to God for their crimes
Youre a moron, we are already living hell on earth thanks to pr*testant kikes like u


>God vs Satan
I wonder who wins! When's the ppv?


Innocent people are going to hell for eternity for holding different beliefs yayy I'm so happy :)


this is your brain on lolbertarianism


buddhist monks who are better people than me in every way will burn in hell forever for not being indoctrinated since birth into my religion take that hahaha :)


who would have thought all this started because of some faggot seetheposting a stack of papers to a church door.


ricels should burn in hell forever, Zach


exactly christian brother, amen. I wish nothing but torture to people who have done no harm and have nothing against me :)


i thought your a pagan zach why do you suddenly care about buddhists now?


? I'm a christian, what makes you think I give a single fuck about people?


zachs a christian, buddhist, and pagan wrapped up into one? this is your mind on hapa


at least I'm not a sinner unlike all of you. brb going to daydream about my gramps going to hell


this is your brain on zoomer


File: 1638251934843.png (292.65 KB, 1000x977, 1000:977, Notre Dame.png) ImgOps iqdb

>It's the ni/gg/er who projects his mentally defects every time he gets served.

He's not fucking Charles Manson, but you queers always worship nobodies.

I only got this, monsieur.


>I only got this, monsieur.
Better than nothing I guess.


I thought it was one of the ten commandements. Or at least that's what I was thaught.


>Christard education


TRSperg is right about Cuckstianity.


File: 1638303322629.jpg (12.55 KB, 300x328, 75:82, 1324174683569.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>Failure in having a relationship with God before reading the bible invariably leads to a complete lack of understanding of what the word of God means, i.e. fedoratards who take the scriptures at face value and c*tholics who use the bible as a means to assume control over people. The latter is arguably more evil, and they will have to answer to God for their crimes.
You'll never understand the Bible if you don't bother learning about the historical contexts the various books were written in or gaining knowledge about the texts themselves. It's a pretty interesting coincidence how the loudest, most adamant Christians out there are the least knowledgeable about their own belief system. Really makes you think.
>knowing about someone who's been infamous for decades is the same as worshiping them


So it is ok to kill? Didn't Jesus say some shit about stones or something? Was Jesus wrong?


What makes Jehova any more factual than Odin or Quetzalcoatl?


The bible is meant to be interpreted like a 40k novel, basically cast the niggers, jews, heretics, and gays into hell while angels soar overhead singing.


Not a pr*testant. I hate c*tholics and pr*testants alike because they continually slander the name of Christ.
>faggots like you allowed kikes to infest
Wrong. A good understanding allows one to view that the jews are the enemy of mankind and that they should scarcely be trusted. At the very least they should be barred from holding any position of power in any nation, even being that of a schoolteacher. You are not aware of this and think that c*tholicucks and pr*tesTAINTs represent Christ. They do not. Kikes fear the Apostolic doctrine because it is the truth, and they suppress it at every turn possible. C*tholicucks were able to thrive due entirely to the religion being a Satanic interpretation of the scriptures, designed according to fit the desires of men and not the wisdom of God (see the chart that I posted). The early Christians were hunted down and actively persecuted by the Jews routinely, even to this day. You are insulting me over something that you have zero knowledge of, but since you do not know much about this topic I will not fire back at you. Keep it up and I will.

Think for a second about (((who))) controls this world. Think now about who (((they))) are most afraid of. If he (Jesus) is not real, why are kikes so scared of him? They will push *slam and other religions on us, but not the word of God. Really makes you think.

>if you don't bother learning about the historical contexts the various books were written in
Understanding and truly comprehending the bible goes far beyond historical context, hence why it is a living word.
As well, I will now quote II Peter 3:15-17 as it pertains to this topic:
15. And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you;
16. As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.
17. Ye therefore, beloved, seeing ye know these things before, beware lest ye also, being led away with the error of the wicked, fall from your own stedfastness.

Is it not apparent that if God gives men the inspiration to write the scriptures, it is also given that help from God is needed to correctly interpret them? There is no harm in assigning historical context, but to gain a true meaning from the word of God, one must hear from God himself.

This is a classic example of taking the scriptures at face value.
>we cannot kill, not even self defense!
Ask anyone who holds those beliefs to explain the following passage: Judges 3:12-31. For a tl;dr, why would God raise up an assassin if killing is… le bad? Could it be that shunning any and all killing is an incorrect interpretation of that commandment?


Are you a Marcionite?


And furthermore, kill who? The commandment does not say 'Thou shalt not kill another man.' Does the law here not apply to animals? How would anyone make animal sacrifices to God if a vague law such as 'no killing' is in place? Then the children of Israel would have no way to cover their sins, meaning God would have put them in an unfair position where they could not save themselves. This is not how God operates and is yet another example of how taking a scripture at face value or ignoring how a part of the text matches up with the rest of the bible can lead to confusion and fighting. It is imperative that one speaks to God and has some sort of connection with him so that any confusion regarding the reading of the scriptures is completely avoided. There is great power in knowing what God has said and how to use it, in particular how to spot kikes and learn why they are so relentlessly evil. Do not be convinced and deceived by retards and faggots that the scriptures command you to take abuse (muh turn the other cheek) or other jewish talking points; they are there so that you may not fully comprehend the wisdom of God. The kikes detest the thought of you, and anyone else, recognizing that they have been called out by God himself numerous times. The implications of people realizing en masse that they are not to be trusted and worthy of suspicion at all times cause them to seethe at Jesus day and night.


No, I am a believer in the Apostolic doctrine, or the teachings of Jesus Christ as he gave to the apostles. You cannot get any closer to what Jesus meant than that. C*tholicism was corrupt the very same hour that it was founded, and lest its followers repent, they will be speechless before God on the day of judgement. As much as I hate them, I will say that I do not wish for them to go to hell. I would rather that they receive salvation and renounce their religion of idolatry and pedophilia.


>Is it not apparent that if God gives men the inspiration to write the scriptures, it is also given that help from God is needed to correctly interpret them?


>You cannot get any closer to what Jesus meant than that
You can if you read apostolic gnostic-era teachings. Simon the Wizard is a cool read that is often vilified by the nigger cattle and the church despite being considered canonical by most other churches.


>He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
>Jesus was without sin
>He was killed by the Sanhedrin and the Romans
>Christians are without sin by the atonement of Christ if they repent
Who has been wronged and who has the right to cast stones here?


>>He was killed by the Romans
Good goy


Yeah, the last time I checked it was the jews that wanted him dead, Pilot washed his hands and let them have their will.
Jews killed Jesus, never forget.


What are you talking about? It's ok to kill because Jesus will forgive me anyways?


If it was all about being peaceable and submissive as modern cucked churches would have you believe, medieval Christian Europe would have rolled over and died during the rise of Islam instead of going on the Crusades.


File: 1638392375176.jpg (96.18 KB, 1280x1731, 1280:1731, spqr.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>nooooooo Pontius Pilate wasn't literally a shabbos goy that carried out the Jews' will, he was based for letting his authority be subverted by the temple with the threat of (((riots)))


Pontius literally told the jews if they wanted Jesus dead they should do it under their own customs inside their own quarter because he would not stain his hands with his blood.
He didn't do anything decisive to stop it, other than use bureaucracy tricks to make them think otherwise (blackmailing/forcing them to pick Jesus instead of his pick which was serial criminal Barabas) but even with his leniency in the deal he also condemned them, pushing it to the point he's the one who made the jews spout their usually ignored saying which officially broke the covenant:
>His blood be on us and on our children!
Roman centurions were just there to guard the process, mocking Jesus sometimes (thorn cross, the whipping was done by a jew tho) but not all of them were against Him, see the Centurion's Request earlier or the story about the Roman Spear which punctured the right lung and made him be baptized/have a psychedelic journey from the enema mixed with blood flowing out, which made the guy ditch his post soon later after the fact.
Now kill yourself Isaac


The Jews killed the Son of God and their only one true Messiah.


Did any of the apostles went on to KILL FOR EPIC JUSTICE after they converted?


File: 1638413222025.jpg (113.86 KB, 802x500, 401:250, a95b4610b2b572a637cbf2f4ba….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.
The consensus among textual critics is that that passage was added into the Book of John at a later date, not that the Book of John seems to be a reliable guide to what Jesus said or did.
It's the other way around. The Jewish establishment was at the mercy of the Romans, and they knew they were walking on thin ice by allowing a preacher running around at Passover preaching the imminent end of the world and thinking he would be crowned King of the Jews when the Son of Man came. Pontius Pilate would relocate from Caesarea to Jersualem with troops to maintain order when feasts would occur. There would be a lot of unrest among Jews around Passover time, when the Red Sea pedestrians would have ideas of God freeing them from their supposed oppressors in mind. The Jewish leaders knew the Romans would push their shit in if they didn't help put down a possible rebellion.


That's not how it works. If you commit sins just because Jesus loves you, you will get rekt much harder than someone who sins ignorantly. You can't rip God off.

The circumstances surrounding the apostles are much different from someone, say, attacking your wife in children, a situation that calls for deadly force. In the time of the apostles, they were trying to spread the gospel to the rest of the world but more often than not they and anyone else who spoke of Jesus were persecuted and hunted down by kikes (read up on what happened to Stephen). One of their main goals was to get kikes to stop persecuting them and realize that they had fallen from grace, so killing them would have caused even more problems. Why would kikes listen to sermons from people killing them? Regardless of that, they were still in the wrong for coming after the early spreaders of the gospel and will be punished accordingly.


In the end Pilate didn't give a shit about some Semitic religious nonsense and the episode serves as a warning that "with Jews, you lose," the opposite of what modern "Judeo"-Christianity tells you.


Bible logic is a bit funny. It claims plainly that killing is a sin while at the same time there's lots of apparently God approved mass killings in the old testament. Such zigzag morality can be confusing and hard to follow even for believers.


Its not that complex - murder is a sin, killing in a justified manner is not - capital punishment is not condemned, nor are the actions of soldiers in the context of war. If you consider a soldier killing an enemy combatant, or someone defending themselves against an attacker akin to that of a thief killing someone for material gain, I don't know what to say to you - but a dsitinction is made both in the Bible and in jurisprudence.


I'll ask once again to all spics here.
Why the Kike god is the only real God?


It just is, okay? now give me your foreskins


Yes, I know all of that. I was pointing out a contradiction in the bible which shouldn't be there. It condemns the act of killing without exemption, it doesn't specify any of your examples as "acceptable" killing, even if it'a clearly justified in the act of self defense.


It certainly does specify in numerous occasions that those examples are acceptable - if you take the Bible as a whole (which you are supposed to do, if you're a Christian). The term 'kill' is but a translation - in other translations it is explicitly 'Thou shalt do no murder'. In Exodus it does state that the killing of a thief who has broken into your house shall not incur a bloodguilt upon the person who kills the thief - if that isnt an explicit condoning of justified violence against an aggressor, I don't know what is.


It's funny how the faggots always ignore this question. Biblefags aren't different from modern atheist cattle and normalfags.


File: 1638472447313.png (4.48 MB, 2400x1350, 16:9, water piano.png) ImgOps iqdb

Just because you are misinterpreting the text does not mean that there is a contradiction. You have been told numerous times that there is a difference between committing murder and defending yourself, and the bible shows many examples of this. You are the type of person who hears the term 'it's raining cats and dogs' and asks out loud why there are not animals falling from the sky.

>Kike god
Christianity is not a religion about worshipping Jews or seeing ourselves as inferior to them.
Galatians 3:28 and 29:
28. There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.
29. And if ye be Christ's, then are ye Abraham's seed, and heirs according to the promise.
If a kike, faggot or retard tells you that Christianity is about worshipping kikes or comes at you with 'muh kike on a stick', feel free to kick him in the mouth with a metal boot. The distinction between kikes and normal people is gone forever because they murdered Christ.
>but… Jesus was a Jew!
Who told the jews that their laws and customs were over, that their covenant with God was due for expiration. (((They))) hated this and still hate Jesus for it to this day.
If God does not exist, why do (((they))) fear him so much? Pay close attention to (((who))) gets the most upset at the mere mention of Jesus. The fact that the 1% of the 1% who control the entire world are scared of someone who 'isn't real' cannot be ignored. Their actions regarding Christ are evidence that he exists and will soon destroy them.
Likewise, there is a second part to finding out whether God is real or not, and that is believing in him for yourself. People can sit down and tell you all day about miracles that they have witnessed or what prayer has done for their lives, but at the end of it seeing God for yourself falls upon you. One of the main takeaways from Christianity is that a relationship with God is something to be worked towards, something that does not happen overnight. If you think to yourself, "Where is God? He will never appear. Why doesn't he just poke his hand through the sky and reveal a part of himself to us?" then you are taking the wrong approach to Christianity. I do not want my post to go on forever, so I will cut it short a bit: Having an attitude of 'God does not exist' while trying to find evidence of him will lead to you believing as such; from the start, you try to fail. It is when you make a genuine effort to live holy and listen to God that you will find for yourself undeniable proof that he exists. When combining this with how scared kikes are of him, it all becomes much more clear.
Lastly, you are not alone in your doubt. Faith in God is not meant to be easy to maintain. Being an actual Christian means living a disciplined life (something that kikes really, really do not want you to do), and with this discipline comes seeing God. For an understanding in what I am talking about, see the 20th chapter of the book of John.
>Your request looks automated; Post discarded.


I concede. Although exodus has all kind of bizarre laws and customs. Including one which I'm sure jews love in Exodus 22:21. OY VEY LET US INTO YOUR LANDS


Be clearer with your damn laws if you don't want any confusion. There shouldn't be any vagueness to allow for multiple interpretations of it.


The clarification about self defense is in Exodus, the same book the laws are outlined in. Quit grasping at straws.


File: 1638476579473.png (377.3 KB, 450x450, 1:1, 1493311316336.png) ImgOps iqdb

>Christianity is not a religion about worshipping Jews or seeing ourselves as inferior to them.
Tell it to all cuckservatives evangelical Protestantism cattle and their obscene love for Israel. With each passing day, I see more and more Christians literally tattooing the Star of David, adopting Jewish names or even using Star of David along with Crucifix.
Also, nice how you ignored the heart of the matter with your wall of text.

Why, of all the gods and other figures and religious texts and traditions that humanity has created throughout its history, the Bible and God/Yahweh/Allah are the only true, while all the other are wrong and are fake? Isn't that a lovely coincidence?
Every time I ask that in places like this, where most anons are expected to be third position or right-winger (different from normalfaggots) I never get an objective answer, the most I see is someone saying "Because Christianity is the only religion that preaches good morals" or "My ancestors worshiped Jesus and Yahweh, so I must do the same", but never an interesting answer in the spiritual or even anthropological aspect.


In a very specific scenario against thieves. It's not quite as exhaustive as it should be.


pro-tip: Jews co-opted the notion of Yahweh being a transcendent and onmipotent God in the Middle Ages from Muslims and Christians, who got it from Plato, and larp as if it was what they believed in in 1600 BC and that everyone else is indebted to them.


>Tell it to all the cuckservatives and etc. etc.
They are not of Christ. There is no Star of David in the bible, either. It is the star of Remphan and a symbol of demon worship (sacrificing your children to Satan, usually alive).

>Also, nice how you ignored the heart of the matter in your wall of text.

Did I not explain how you can find out for yourself that God is real? I just told you that if you take the steps required to live holy and believe in him, then all will become clear. Regardless of that, the reaction of the rulers of this world, the kikes, to Jesus also gives a clue as to what is real and what is not. Studying other religions closely will reveal to you, if you are close with God, that their foundations and conclusions, even with good intentions, are wrong. Take, for example, Buddhism. I don't think I need to explain why 'karma' is not real within the confines of Buddhism, but I will give a short explanation. If there is no god, where do 'good' and 'evil' come from? Where does man come from, and when did he begin? Morality becomes arbitrary and whatever anyone wishes it to be; who is to say what results in good karma or bad? With no creator, everything would have to happen into existence on accident or purely by chance. There would be nothing 'good' or 'bad' because everything would be created at random. In other words, there would be no higher meaning of anything anywhere at any time.

As well, the concept of being reborn over and over again does not make much sense. What system is in place that decides you have reached nirvana? If there is no creator, where did this cycle of life come from? What difference does it make, according to the system of rebirth, that you have reached nirvana or not? The answer is that there is no rebirth of the self on Earth. For life to have happened into existence at complete random, something impossible, complete with a set of arbitrary rules that let you get reborn over and over again until you reach an arbitrary state of nirvana, is not a concept that can be demonstrated as true, nor is it something that can be proven through practicing it. When you inevitably die, that is it until we are judged by God. There are more problems with Buddhism but I think I have said enough for now, especially since I have not covered *slam and pagayism.

>never an interesting answer in the spiritual or even anthropological aspect.

I am getting into a subject that takes a very long time and great deal of reading to explain, but I will try and keep it as short and concise for you as I can while still getting the point across. I have already explained how you can prove the existence of God spiritually by living holy and taking steps towards being closer to him. From an anthropological standpoint, diving into the concept of free will and consciousness gives an even greater insight into just how real God is. The more you study why humans make choices for themselves and what sets us apart from, say, dogs and antelopes, the more you will begin to understand that there is indeed a god that exists. Once that threshold has been met (however long it might take you), one will easily be able to overcome the lies that are pedohileslam and treefaggotry.


YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Very true. Jews traditionally saw God as a powerful but capricious being that had to be placated for their own good. His laws were divine because they were the laws of a god, not because any inherent goodness or rationality in them. The "traditional" Orthodox Jews' views of God setting down unchanging universal rules is ironically closer to the Greek view of divine law than what their ancient ancestors would have believed.


>Christianity is the one true religion because there must have been a creator.

What a dull, desperate conclusion.


>If there is no god, where do 'good' and 'evil' come from?
Karma is supposed to be a cosmic law of cause and effect based on the outcomes of your actions. It has nothing to do with being judged as good or evil, which are man-made concepts.
>Morality becomes arbitrary and whatever anyone wishes it to be; who is to say what results in good karma or bad?
Karma has to do with the way your actions reverberate on the outside world and goes beyond human morality.
>With no creator, everything would have to happen into existence on accident or purely by chance. There would be nothing 'good' or 'bad' because everything would be created at random. In other words, there would be no higher meaning of anything anywhere at any time.
Just because there's no personal being micromanaging all of existence doesn't mean that there isn't an ultimate source of everything.

All the corroborating accounts we have from people who have Near-Death Experiences and advanced occultists who delve deep into Out-of-Body Experiences seem to point to reincarnation as something that actually happens at some point after death.


so under karma if you murder someone and people benefit from it somewhere you get positive karma?


Christianity is a less cool Zoroastrianism


I'm studying at lot about ancient European texts from 7th to 10th, that together with me knowing how pathetic and hypocrite Christian zoomers are only make me feel like it's depressing to know how this Jewish cult destroyed the world, not only Europe.


Once again you post a wall of text without saying nothing. Like Muttni and her Schizo rambling about race mixing.


File: 1638654529228.png (12.05 KB, 500x250, 2:1, Oekaki.png) ImgOps iqdb


>without saying nothing
So he said something? I agree, he did.


Eccelesiastes 3
"1To every thing there is a season, and a time to every purpose under the heaven: 2A time to be born, and a time to die; a time to plant, and a time to pluck up that which is planted; 3A time to kill, and a time to heal; a time to break down, and a time to build up; 4A time to weep, and a time to laugh; a time to mourn, and a time to dance; 5A time to cast away stones, and a time to gather stones together; a time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing; 6A time to get, and a time to lose; a time to keep, and a time to cast away; 7A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak; 8A time to love, and a time to hate; a time of war, and a time of peace. 9What profit hath he that worketh in that wherein he laboureth?"
This is consistent with God's word.
If revelation comes to pass he's probably going to commit the biggest slaughter in history.


File: 1641266565339.jpg (108.97 KB, 1024x807, 1024:807, shabbos goy boomer.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

Pic related.
>If revelation comes to pass he's probably going to commit the biggest slaughter in history.
Revelation was intended for a contemporary audience. Jesus isn't coming back.


Wow yet NSDAP armband banned in Germany and UK. a fucking joke. Kikes have an ethnostate yet no uproar


File: 1641336982558.png (108.28 KB, 459x349, 459:349, 0dd5afdc0791cc9dd7543a8693….png) ImgOps iqdb


[Last 50 Posts]
[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top ]