>>142617You are who you are, your genetic makeup isn't relevant past you not being one of my ingroup. You're either in or out, and you're already out, so there's no extra distinction to me past that. The only lines that matter are the ones that tread that line (are Turks or South Yuros huwite or swarthy, are Moroccans nigger or sandnigger, where the line of jeet / SEAmonkey / chinky is drawn etc) - past that it's just looking out for my own countrymen / ethnic group which always comes #1 before race.
At the end of the day, huwite, nigger, jeet, gook, sandnigger, slav, SEAmonkey, hue, mutt or whatever else there is; a good person trying to be a good person will always be a good person trying to be a good person, and that's what matters once you get past race. I'd never want a jeet living in my country (we've each got our own unique problems to deal with, and I've got my own patch of land I want to defend), but I'd much rather stand side-by-side with a good jeet than a bad jeet if we had to get together like some WW3 shit, before shaking hands (washing them after), and then going back home to work on our own problems again. That's the way things used to be, but we've kinda had a century of the burgers winning WW2 by default because they weren't a blown up mess afterwards - so we've all had to deal with a century of their stupid foriegn policy that implies that all the heckin races are equal and welcome in le mixing pot of mutts; so nation and race have been supressed, to everyone's detriment. Their problem was that King Nigger / MLK had a dream that all Americans were equal in terms of content before colour (that an American Nigger is still an American, and almost everyone in the USA is non-native to the USA), so now France is having it's arm twisted to let in Moroccans because they also have a dream and they're fucking equal to whitey you chud and French people are equally non-native to France or something. It went from American racial equality within a nation with the people they already had and had to make do with (which was an opinion with good and bad elements), to that being projected into racial equality/equity on a international scale (which has been an unmitigated disaster, and is going to cause genocides within this century).
I think there is such a thing as objective morality, and while you can dance around the lines like some smug liberal midwit cunt, it's for each our own to figure out, work towards and advise each other on.
And by advise each other on, I mean expressing it through racism. I don't want to work with you in my country and will deny you work opportunities because you shouldn't be in my country and that takes priority, I make poo jokes because I think that jeets doing it is wrong and think it's funny / it should be pointed out but don't really care about it past that since it's mostly your problem not mine. Cannibalism - yeah, that's a good example of an easy "objectively bad". On the other hand, using chopsticks over knives and forks as something more nuanced as to if it's right or not - well I just found out a few days back that the reason why chinky people do it, is because it's deemed impolite for a chef to serve food that isn't cut up appropriately (it's still unprepared to them) - I understand their logic, I just think Knife/Fork is better since it allows the eater more choice, to tackle more foods and to be able to eat multiple items at once (but I can at least respect them for striving towards their own logic of what is and is not right, and since I don't have to deal with them, it's still their problem not mine). Applies to everything really. Jeets have their own problems (sanitation, caste system, sanitation, physical fitness, sanitation, sexual relations, did i mention sanitation etc) - and while the answers might be vague, I think the right ones are out there. I mean, do jeets like stepping in shit, being surrounded by landfill, being so unremarkable that they win 0 medals in international sport, with their holy river being completely toxic to all forms of life? And if that changed tomorrow, would that not be a better world to live in for them?
The kike shit is just a problem bigger than race (but still below nation), since as an ideology, it goes the extra mile of informing+"justifying" bad behavior that promotes scheming, slavery / usury and undermining / backstabbing everyone else they percieve as subhuman cattle, and so on (and over the years, has almost certainly embedded itself into their DNA via epigenetics) (tl;dr, repeat behavior enough over a heritage, and it starts to embed itself into one's DNA as something you instinctively lean towards behaving like). I'm no expert on their history, but I'd wager da purest jooz share a similar genetic makeup to their neighbouring Syrians (who weren't really affected by the muslim conquests like the Palestinians / Egyptians were) - but a Syrian is probably going to be far less of a pain in the neck than an Israeli, even if they share DNA, even if the Syrian is on that islam shit (which is another problem), even if that kike appears more friendly on the surface.
Because Syrians, while equally foreign, and equally should stay the fuck away from me, just seem like better people.
tl;dr be nice, do the right thing, you are who and what you are, you're not going to change it.