No.333592
I actually figured it out. This is cutting edge. If the internet has any sense, the understanding will radiate outward from this origin point. I figured out why everything is going woke. I'm actually running off of a quote of someone I won't name, but I don't think it matters. He's a literal King. Maybe I should quote him. I don't want to attract shills though.
Psyops and propaganda work at a slow pace over the course of generations.
>Why are they destroying our franchises?
They "aren't." I thought they were, but it's just the next phase. Boomers used to say they liked the originals better than the new version. They've been redoing films every 10+ years going back 60 years. Flight of the Phoenix (1965) and (2004). Oceans 11 (1960) and (2001). The Four Feathers (1939) and (2002). The list goes on…
What is fucking happening is the previous gen, our gen was targeted with subliminal, feminist allied, adventure films that had more or less generally masculine male protagonists. The previous generation before us was targeted with maybe a subversive new outlook on what is morally correct. Looking back on the old films we loved, it all seems pozzed, just not overtly woke like current shit. Now it's all female protagonist slop. All the streaming shit is female oriented, obviously targeting female demographics. I think it tends to target roasties, single moms, stay at home moms, etc. Why aren't they feeding them original content or making original franchises? Besides 50 Shades of Grey. SEXO
HERE IT IS: TLDR:
They're merging the young boy demographics with older adult female demographics using the same intellectual property: LOTR, Star Wars, Indiana Jones, all MCU, Fallout, and now Warhammer… They're doing this so young boys and older women have common languages to enable this type of relationship: female pedophilia with young boys. Feminism has enabled women to gain access to institutions to having authority over children, and now they're being targeted by the same fantasy, escape entertainment media, so they can covertly, in plain site, bond psychologically (flirt in a seemingly harmless way), which can then eventually lead to covert sexual bonding or attempts at such.
Have you seen the damn near innumerable amount of female teachers being arrested for having sex with middle/high school student boys? It's fucking insane. There are hundreds all over the country, Daily Nice articles pop up nearly multiple times a week. These are just the ones being caught.
Just look at She-Hulk for example. She carries a grown man to bed. A woman IRL obviously can't be the size of a she-hulk, but she can match the size ratio with a smaller boy. That's just an overt example. This explains the relationship dynamic with the Fallout Okie Dokie roastie and the childlike retard black character. The tranny is a bit too btfo to enter a relationship with a junior because they are sabotaged by heckin' bigots. The race mixing is the misdirection. The fact of the matter is it's an experienced, overly sexual, mature woman talking to a sexually inexperienced guy. Gahoole himself might actually be a victim of this. I bet I can think of a bunch more examples. I'm remembering Carrie Fisher releasing a book at the same time as Star Wars talking about her sexual relationship with Harrison Ford. It's a thread woven into the IP, into the marketing. There might not be an onscreen relationship, but there might be marketing, and there is definitely IP demographic bridging of this dynamic.
BROS, DID I FIGURE IT OUT?
HIDE YO KIDS, HIDE YO WIVES. THEY PSYCHOLOGICALLY RAPING EVERYBODY. ALL GRIFTERS ARE DISTRACTING. ALL THE FUCKING YOUTUBE GRIFTERS PROBABLY DON'T EVEN KNOW THEY ARE PART OF THIS.
/TV/ /TV/ /TV/
No.333593
Another bot thread
No.333599
Bizarre textwall
No.333602
>>333592I have no idea what you're even trying to say. You need to work on the way you write so it flows better. Try giving us a summary; this is borderline nonsense.
No.333604
>>333602Some people on this website can't read, so I'll just cart your feedback to the side for now. Thanks.
No.333607
>>333602Type into your search bar
>female teacher arrested sex with studentIt's of pandemic quantities.
No.333611
>>333598That was just awful casting at the time, Anakin was supposed to be 9 while Jake Lloyd was 8 and the queen was supposed to be 14 years old so a whole 2-3 years younger than Natalie Portman at the time of filming.
Originally Anakin was going to be 12 but then the whole 'leaving behind his mother as a slave' bit wouldn't have been as heart wrenching.
No.333613
>>333611>It's a coincidence, goy.No, it's fucking deliberate.
Conventional relationships began to be corrupted on screen in the 1970s. In the 1990s we get suggested pedophilia.
We're straight up into the overt symbolism with actual sex (She-Hulk), and demographic bridging.
Why the fuck is Star Wars formerly for teen boys now for stay at home moms or older single women?
Ep 4-6 is Prince and Princess (SWERVE BROTHER/SISTER) (back on track with Han and Princess)
Ep 1-3 older woman and younger boy
Ep 7-9 Feminazi rebel leadership and young males
Streamslop on D+ is picrel
No.333616
>>333614Teachers fucking their students is a tale as old as time. In my opinion, they shouldn't go to prison for it. Losing their job should be enough.
No.333617
>>333616Don't be a retard.
Females being in teacher positions has not been a flat line. It has been growing steadily upward / over time.
No.333618
>>333610Feminism is shit that enables foid pedophiles? Yeah, that's one of the features.
No.333619
>>333617>Females being in teacher positions has not been a flat line. It has been growing steadily upward / over time.I think part of this shift to female teachers occurred as an attempt to fix the problem of too many male teachers fucking their students. Now, we've come full circle. It turns out everybody likes fucking kids, regardless of gender.
No.333620
>>333618It's a 1, 2, 3 punch combo. Makes them reject masculine men and want to be in control. Gets them into spaces where they can have access to children.
Then the movies and television psychologically program them into becoming pedophiles.
This might even explain why men become manchildren, to stay "attractive" to the feminists or at least not put them off. Might explain why you see these manchildren having wives.
No.333621
>>333613>Ep 1-3 older woman and younger boyThe worst thing is it could have worked and been interesting if it was a sheltered young teenager 2-3 years older at most(12 and 14 would be perfect) falling for an exceptional young slave that's much more experienced and savvy than her and is on the crux of becoming an incredible man.
Instead they tried to make an 8 year boy who yells 'yippee!' like a child and a 16 year old teenager who seems ready for her debutante ball appear to fall in love and it was awful.
No.333623
>>333621>Instead they tried to make an 8 year boy who yells 'yippee!' like a child and a 16 year old teenager who seems ready for her debutante ball appear to fall in love and it was awful.I don't think they "fell in love" until Episode II, when Anakin was older. There are endless cases in real life where an adult crossed paths with a child, they never did anything untoward with the child, and love came
after the child grew up.
No.333625
>>333623Just rewatched episode 1 scenes with both of them and you're right I misremembered it and this inaccurate article(or maybe they're talking about the novelization which was slightly different than the movies) didn't help
>He immediately became infatuated with Padmé Amidala, sensing through the Force that they would one day marry - even if he didn't know this was forbidden under the Jedi Code at that early an age.https://screenrant.com/star-wars-movies-anakin-vader-age-how-old/ No.333626
>>333623>>333625Moot point.
They don't need to appear onscreen romantic when it is heavily implied that they are future love interests, and even if argued that it's not, upon rewatch, it's then already known then that they are love interests.
No.333631
>>333626There's nothing wrong with it, though. They got friendly but there's no indication that the adult Padme was attracted to little boy Anakin. They fell in love when they were reunited years later.
No.333639
>>333592I thought those long time franchises that everyone including their grannies know about got butchered once the oldschool liberals retired and left their staffs to their radicalized marxists heirs and since they're not even able wipe their own asses they straight out unveiled their propaganda.
>Liberals morals were subtle not forcedAnd now every piece of media that gets funded by their sugardaddies at ESG and DEI is just there to struck the egos of the mentally defective.
No.333647
>>333592>The fact of the matter is it's an experienced, overly sexual, mature woman talking to a sexually inexperienced guy.Frankly I think this is reflective more than perscriptive. That is, adult men are becoming more and more beta, insecure, and infantilized. If it is perscriptive, then I'd assume this whole trend you're talking about is more about turning men into manchildren than it is about turning women into pedos.
No.333660
>>333631Re-read the OP. It's not about literal onscreen relationships. It's about guiding women to becoming pedophiles. That doesn't mean you start at the end of the programming. Episode 1 was 1999, and going back to rewatch now that women are exposed to star wars via streaming apps is just as damaging if not more so than if it was an on screen romance. It would have been rejected. Instead it's deemed innocent. But when women go back and watch 1 and see how the relationship began, that doesn't mean they will have patience in a school setting for that boy to become 18. If anything they will fear losing him the closer he gets to graduating.
There still isn't an onscreen romance between an adult woman and male child. She-Hulk is the closest thing we have gotten so far.
You can break down that Ep 1 scene even further. A grown woman that is a queen that is responsible and dealing with real world shit, finds a boy still playing with toys that lives at home with mommy and has mommy issues.
This meme is real. I have seen it with my own eyes multiple times IRL.
No.333661
>>333647It's both. The manchildren thing happens in ways probably more often using influential character archetypes, but this demographic bridging accounts for the female pedophiles.
>>333639These movies and shows don't lead me to believe that they are created by inept people. I think they know exactly what they're doing. I think they intentionally produce things to be "bad" for the type of consumer they don't want to watch it. Grown men are not the target audiences. We are targeted by the media propaganda who's job it is to attack us to make us feel isolated. That further segregates us away from children and females because they're the ones enjoying the slop still. If anything the talent has only improved and because of that they can achieve these kinds of divisions.
No.333669
This sounds incredibly hot. Why exactly should I care about this?
No.333670
>>333668Should be an 8 or higher, but the average film watcher wouldn't appreciate it. The unsettling plot triggers the normie. Great cinematography.
No.333671
>>333670I'm talking about the logline, summarizing the situation as "unavoidable complexities."
>>333669>Hot is good.>t. Subpsyche raped coombrain. No.333672
>>333592The quote I was working with essentially claims that the entire purpose of Feminism is to enable female pedophiles by granting them access to children.
Everything happening in movies and tv is just confirmation of this and a subsequent layer of psychological programming.
No.333677
>>333592Great work Hercule B.O.
How about solving the mystery of the missing job application next?
No.333681
>>333677Best meme in years. Keep it coming
No.333682
>>333681>The wagie revolution will be /tv/ized.>>333677Do brown people really write paragraphs of thoughts
No.333685
>>333610How old is this video? Because he and lots of other faggots are praising and protecting this show now.
No.333715
What do we stop the straight shota illuminati??
No.333734
>>333685Why are you saging? Didn't see this until next day.
I just found the pic on image search lol
No.333798
>>333682>Do brown people really write paragraphs of thoughtsYes especially disjointed and completely incomprehensible ones. They do it to mimic actual human reasoning.
No.333805
>>333798I get that I messed up by changing the pic because there's then no title to tell you where I'm going to take you through the paragraphs, but I don't think they're that disjointed. I even underlined a TLDR.
No.333824
>>333805Sorry that you're brown or whatever, paco, but I still ain't reading that shit.
No.333825
>>333824Now that's something a brown person would say.
No.333849
>>333805I'm not saying it's formatted improperly I'm saying it's schizo tier ranting about what in actuality is just a badly run industry filled with women and brown people because of DEI nepotism.
No.333857
>>333849Oh ok so you're legitimately stupid.
No.333861
>>333857I think he's obsessed with Sesame Street, and they're talking about the color brown today.
No.333862
>>333825I'm only brown on the top of my head.
No.333887
>>333857No it's just incoherent babble. For cultural zietgiest to occur it has to be compelling, nothing about this is compelling it's mindless self indulgent trash.
No.333892
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>333887This
It would be helpful if OP either read it out loud or hired a youtuber to read it out loud, preferably someone good at reading out loud like vidrel.
No.333912
>>333887How the fuck is it mindless
You haven't even shown that you understand what I wrote
No.333918
>>333912You can keep saying I don't understand but I just don't agree.
No.333919
Also watch she hulk and then tell me there was a single coherent though through that entire show.
No.333921
>>333919I don't think you know what coherent means, and you're proving more and more that you don't even understand the OP.
No.333939
>>333921Yeah because it's not cogent or coherent.
No.334006
>>333939What's not to get?
They're merging the roastie stay at home mom demographic with teen boys demographic. Everybody is just offended by woke because they think it's some liberal agenda retards, but what's actually happening is older women are being marketed to with all the franchises. Little girls don't give a shit about Captain Marvel. Older liberal women do but few will watch it. It slowly infects all of MCU. It's already happened with Star Wars. It's happening with every show and movie franchise.
No.334014
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
No.334019
>>334014>A no context given youtube video.Won't watch
No.334106
>>333592I see what you're getting at OP and I agree to an extent. The whole "mommy dom", femdom, femboy thing seems like a psyop. You link it to pay-dough-feeleuh but I see it as something a bit more sinister, an inversion of the male/female archetypes within the pysches of small children.
It feels designed to emasculate men and establish women as the alpha, or to make boys feel ok with being weak and feminine and for girls to feel ok being butch and masculine aka to push them towards troondom (which might be part of a greater population reduction and/or middle class elimination agenda, commonly mistaken as a more simplistic white yuro elimination agenda). Not that there can't be feminine men or masculine women, but we all know as soon as a girl plays with trains or a boy plays with dolls (((they))) will say it's time for meds and operations. And of course in the meantime they're tearing families apart, ensuring builtin childhood trauma for the next generation, remove that next generations links to their familial and tribal past thus preventing the proper transmission of culture, allowing (((them))) to have that much more influence over the next generation's thoughts and feelings…….
No.334108
>>334106Dom mommy shit is definitely pushed on social media fitness girl influencers. Some are even taken aback by it. Some try to embrace it as a meme.
It's like nooo you can't have fit women being healthy, we have to pervert it someway.
I don't even want to click this link.
No.334109
>>334106>>3341081) The internet isn't real life, you are overexposed to weirdos
2) Something triggering a fetish doesn't make it inherently fetishistic
No.334113
>>334111>Meds nowJIDF is slow to evolve, but when they do they sound the same.
No.334114
>>334106I think if you look at the situation from the top down, the people at the top live in a normalized state where grooming children for pedophilia is the norm, so molding society to suit that norm is going to cause major damage. I would label all the things you listed as a categorically bycatch. In other words, a society that builds toward enabling female pedophiles (and male pedophiles) would have these things you mentioned as symptoms.
Female pedophiles are hard to identify. If you asked a room of 300 people what a pedophile looks like, they would all picture a man, maybe with a creepy mustache. They associate pedophilia with strength over a child and invasive posture like a phallus. Seeing what a female pedophile looks like is a lot more difficult because they are not overpowering their victims through physical strength. Perhaps in the act, they are, but it's more likely they are offering bait by how they dress to at least neutralize opposition.
No.334123
>>334109I'm not calling it fetishistic, by "mommy dom" I mean the general energy of girl power that's so pervasive in modern media, e.x. op's pic of she-hulk.
I really rack my head trying to think why the girl power crap is pushed so hard. In the past women entering the workforce helped justify general price increases (households have 2 incomes now), today what does it offer? Legs for the boss to look at? Distracting the men to decrease their work output, as if china or russia were behind it to weaken the west?
Maybe it's just because women watch more tv than men, and writers think they're just appealing to their audience. In my car on the radio I've heard ads that were ridiculously male appealing, joking about ex wives and crap. Never would that fly on tv, but I assume radio has a bigger male audience so they can get away with it.
But then again the encroachments upon h'white male spaces seems really aggressive, again it could just be corporations attempting to broaden appeal to more general audiences but between games, movies, private clubs like the boy scouts, traditionally male careers, etc. it feels like men just aren't being allowed to have private spaces to yuck it up with the boys and BE boys. They make us feel bad for being boys, and then hypnotically suggest to us that with one small nip and tuck (or dick and suck, heh) we can join the LGTBQ++ club and suddenly be surrounded with new friends and family we can yuck it up with from then on out. People who will love us, stand up for us, give us a shoulder to cry on, we'll have a tribe a worldview an entire religion all spelled out for us just for coming out as a gayboy. That's some powerful psychology to be using on dumb horny teens trying to find their place in this lost, directionless world we've all been blessed with growing up in
Maybe rich people just want more femboy sloots to bang, maybe they just want more cash from the broader audiences, or from all the surgeries and drugs and clothes and general consumerism that troondom seems to bring; maybe they want to replace the western middle class with third worlders who won't get so uppity about personal rights, government corruption, or any of that other magna carta bullcrap, so they psyop the middle class into being unproductive, distracted by bullshit, and unlikely to pass their genes on to the future compared to the idiot masses.
No.334124
>>334109>Something triggering a fetish doesn't make it inherently fetishisticWhat the fuck, nigger?
No.334126
>>334123>I mean the general energy of girl power that's so pervasive in modern media, e.x. op's pic of she-hulk.Women aren't watching diet marvel girlboss shit they are watching You, Emily in Paris, Bridgerton etc.
>They make us feel bad for being boys, and then hypnotically suggest to us that with one small nip and tuck (or dick and suck, heh) we can join the LGTBQ++ club and suddenly be surrounded with new friends and family we can yuck it up with from then on out. People who will love us, stand up for us, give us a shoulder to cry on, we'll have a tribe a worldview an entire religion all spelled out for us just for coming out as a gayboy.Trannies are loser freaks who desperately need YOU to join their ranks, so they make the world appear as miserable and depressing as possible to make their cult seem attractive. Alt-right does the same shit as do many cults
>>334124Some people want to fuck balloons, balloons aren't inherently sexual
No.334127
>>334126>Some people want to fuck balloons, balloons aren't inherently sexualThat doesn't matter. You can film balloons in a way that they are sexual. That's the power of film.
No.334129
>>334128They figured this out with Eisenstein's work. Can't find the clip.
Basically montage can be used to create meanings for shots and scenes through juxtaposition. The meaning of a shot will change depending on what shot preceded it.
No.334133
>>334123This is where my head used to swirl until I put the rest of the other stuff I spoke about together.
The fact remains that they are targeting women in their 20s-40s, and they're targeting teenage boys, with the same material.
Men can try to enjoy the Obi-Wan show, baby yoda, She-Hulk, and all the other shit, but they will ultimately fail to enjoy it.
There are absurd subtleties that promote the authority of women in all the franchises. They are either in authority positions or hold authority and control over men. This isn't even a post-2016 or post-Floyd thing. It's been happening since at least the 2000s. Hell, even Top Gun.
No.334134
>>334133Seems like the logical course is to avoid anything that's a "franchise."
No.334137
>>334136Then why are you almost the only one to ever post it since the /tv/ awards
No.334141
>>334140>The brainwashing backfired.There are countless brainwashed females in law school alone.
Every year spent in college is a year that woman is not married and not having kids, delaying her own development toward infertility.
No.334142
>>334141>Every year spent in college is a year that woman is not married and not having kids, delaying her own development toward infertility.You can include high school in this, too.
No.334143
>>334142High school isn't really a choice.
No.334145
>>334143Women learn everything they need to know in primary school. The only thing I'd add is home economics, but the jews took most of it out of the curriculum. By 15, women are ready to be debutantes and don't need to delay their purpose any further.
No.334171
>>334140Man, is this what ugly women in Russia have to settle for? I've heard that men are scarce, but imagine being so desperate you'd go for something like a tranny.
I didn't think trannies even existed in Russia
No.334172
>>334171She's probably a Russian living in jewmerica.
No.334197
>>334179I'm guessing the mod has a an investment in the OP's schizo rantings because he's tried so hard to keep it on topic.
No.334199
>This is now a meta thread.