>>143256>we<"we?" how about you first>HOW DARE YOU. HOW, DARE YOU. And in fact of course, IT'S PROBABLY YOU THAT'S THE FED ROUND HEREAgain. You first. Post proof once done :)
The "arming people who want you dead" or the "arm them by appealing to their love of the Jews and how we must protect Jews" or "arm them by appealing to their athiestic love for the Bible" or the ledditspacing is just extra BTFO to go. And the McFlurry? Is on me.
If you were honest and genuine, you'd be telling people to buy 3D printers, become untraceable with good opsec, get good at targeting undefended infrastructure and not going in with the starting pitch of "so basically I expect to die, so they can take muhgunz from my cold dead hands after getting nothing of note done". Modern problems require modern solutions - the 2nd Amendment is a century out of date, was worded poorly and has been cucked to all fuck and back to the point of terminal BTFO (and if you weren't aware, it's irrelevant to the rest of the world going through the same problems).
You shouldn't be getting people pro-2A (lawcuck), you should get them to not give a fuck about it's approval to begin with. You want your tyrannical government dead, but at the same time, you want their approval beforehand? Retard.
>there's no shortage of people that would gladly do some cartel tier shit to you.I guess they'd have to find me first, just like all the feds that you want me to unmask myself to :))))
Wait aren't the cartels all feds?!? le Freudian slip? :))))))))))))