>>143727I'm going to be up front about my opinions regardless of whether they're unpopular here. I don't care about the Jew question, nor do I care to name the Shoah in any particular distinction. How I would describe it to the man on his doorstep is as follows:
>"call it Globalism, call it Zionism, call it what you want just so long as you know that you are hated"In this way I'm evasive on the "where", and the "who", and also (but to a significantly lesser extent) the "how". So my emphasis is on the "what" and the "why".
Because these are the things that directly affect the man and he can see it, without him needing the patience for a history lesson, or a geography lesson.
There is also the deliberate distinction between "the bankers" and "the ordinary common Jew" who attend their Synagogue every Saturday.
In this way I believe I can be more rather than less effective. Alex Jones I believe maintained a similar frame of reference. He was considered a sufficient annoyance to bankrupt, so to me it doesn't feel like I'd be letting the side down in my approach.
I happen to be clued in on the turn within the Anglo-Norman aristocracy around 1745… But I want Joe public to know that he is hated, why he is hated, and how that hatred is manifested.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.