[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top ]

/lit/ - Literature and Writing

Fiction and Non-fiction
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1635073069041.jpg (1.83 MB, 3000x4000, 3:4, IMG20211021161753.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

 No.2048

how would you design characters for 1000 chapters of one piece, pokemon anime or asterisk comic or harry potters?
do you write the story first or do you design characters first? which one which?

 No.2052

Make it up as you go bb. Unlike something like Against the Day where I think it all needs to be plot beforehand. A good tool is if the chqracter is recurring or not, if not it may be a one off. B
Sometimes writers also introduce a character thats a one off but loved so much he becomes a mainstay. A good example is Turner Diaries, it was written serially and you can tell Pierce drops characters once he writes a new part. Then beings them back for a head nod but everyone is mostly a political talking point or a dud.

 No.2053

>>2052
oh i ve heard this but then you cant always have one off characters become popular so how does those who you write up as recurring fills in all of your stories "properly"? seems kinda wild without any sort solid ideas or plan…

 No.2068

File: 1635286562709.jpg (117.86 KB, 958x1010, 479:505, Pagenotes.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>2048
I tend to make a list of the main characters at the beginning, just writing down all sorts of tidbits about them; physical description, likes, dislikes, family background, etc.
This is especially useful if you don't know where the story is going or how it is going to end.

Some, or most, of these bits of background/info may not even make it into the story, but I find it is useful to have established some sort of basic character before going into the story. It makes it easy to decide where that character is going, how they would react in a certain situation if you know a little about their background.


Came across these notes J. K. Rowling made when she started writing the Harry Potter books, detailing the blood status for each character was something she thought to include from the very beginning. The empty circle symbolises a pure-blood father, the filled square a non-magical father. The Star of David symbolises the mother's blood status, while the square with an 'N' inside means a non-magical/non pure-blood mother(?). Finally the letter at the end is the house they end up in at Hogwarts (Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, Gryffindor or Slytherin).
I could not find anyone talking about the fact that Rowling used a Star of David to symbolise the mother's blood status; is she implying that the witches and wizards are like Jews? The serpent symbolism of Slytherin is also interesting, especially since these witches and wizards are die-hard blood purists.

 No.2073

>>2068
You take pictures like a 90s serial killer. How many people have you killed?

 No.2077

>>2073
I think he merely saved the pic, anon.

 No.2090

>>2073
As >>2077 pointed out I did not take it myself, it comes from the Harry Potter Wiki, and from the 2001 documentary Harry Potter and Me where Rowling shows off her earliest notes before she started writing the books.
Because it is a screenshot from a 2001 documentary that is probably the best image quality out there.
http://web.archive.org/web/20211020003906/https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_Me

No one seems to have commented on the Stars of David, or the fact that Rowling thought about the importance of the blood purity from the very beginning.
The circle around the Star might mean pure-blooded mother, while a plain Star is a Muggle mother. Still no idea what the 'N' is supposed to mean…



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top ]