>>268194No Iran would of given up the hostages much sooner but that might of found Carter getting re-elected. If Iran had realized just how much worse they would be making things playing into (((Republican))) control they would of done things much different. After Carter left Zbigniew Brzezinski was out and the hob of "National Security Advisor" would be broken up into multiple people as a lot of weird stuff happened. "People" were out and "institutes" were in. Politicians would no longer be expected, like say Kennedy, to make their own path against a system but to just do what was advised. Look at what happened to Richard Allen, weird shit, and basically the result was Kissinger ran every administration after, republican or democrat, with the (((media))) going along with everything. We just needed information, every piece of information we required to go to war would be given by that unique state in the middle east. America really is "before Reagan" and "after". Russia would go all-in on Afghanistan, the money guys basically took over both parties, and a world the Rockefellers had been working on for 60 years started to take shape. People's temple wound up with a dead congress man. It's as clear a message as you can get after the assassinations in the 60's. Also the CIA was found to be using christian groups as fronts, including World Vision. World Vision would keep getting found in weird places and America's military seemed to be less focused on their own safety with "policing the world" for for "human rights abuses" or whatever. Suddenly the military didn't seem to care about defending borders but playing like super heroes.
