/tv/ - Movies and Television

Faggot ass Zoomer post

>>321390
This one was decent.

>>321423
Fuckoff Ridley

tbh, that sucks, but it's not even the real Robin Hood tree, which is in Nottingham. It's basically just culturally significant on account of being in a movie.

I hope the little shit who did this gets raped to death.

>>321302
Maybe part of it was, but it was focused on the movie and its filming. It seems strange to me that the History Channel showed something like that, although even back in the early 2000s they showed occasional paranormal stuff on shows like History's Mysteries. This I remember being different in that it just seemed like it was made to encourage viewers to go watch the movie.

>>321303
Don't think I saw a documentary about Signs. I remember a long time ago watching one entirely about crop circles, it was very thorough, had aerial footage of the crop circles from different parts of the world where they appeared.

>>321328
>>321254
>>321303
It was crop circles, they literally showed it after the movie.

>>321354
What I saw featured M. Night Shamalamadingdong being interviewed, and maybe other cast and crew members. I remember it being shot on the same location as the movie, so they must have been filmed around the same time. It actually looked a lot like the making-of video >>320907, but from what I recall it didn't go into things with the same amount of depth.

>>321357
I watched both on the same regional aggregating channel that mostly broadcasted foreign Hollywood movies, so it was absolutely a tie in, even if not advertised as being so.

Also watched an American Werewold in London and Cemetery Man.
TV used to be good.

I like the shorts where it's just him and Pluto goofing around

>>320873
Those are great. The direction in those is seriously underrated. Even live action movies weren't doing dynamic camera angles like that at the time.

>>320869
He's neither, he's a cryptojew playing the name game.

>>320869
His nemesis was a Rothschild duck who made it big at South Africa.

>>320791
OP, what did you do?

I'm surprised that the Chinese posters show niggers; they don't like that sorta stuff there.

>>321375
Chinks don't actually mind niggers. The NBA is very popular there. What they don't stand for is bullshit like what Disney did with The Little Mermaid, unlike American goys who just slop it up.

>>321379
Holy fucking NPC batman

>>321375
All the big nigger movies failed in China.
They watch the NBA like watching an animal in its natural habitat.

>>321344
>Evil Dead 1 barely has any jokes, it plays itself straight horror.
Watch it again, it's goofy as fuck.

>>321345
Probably because it's a low budget 80s flick, but it never goes full action whacky tier like 2.
It's horror at it's core, no mix of genres bullshit.

>>321334
The first Evil Dead is the best out of the trilogy.
>>321345
Being cheesy is par for the course for "genre films" filmed on low budgets.

>>321337
I tried to watch some of his new streams and they are very boring tbqh, at least before he used to get some guests on, to talk about random subjects, now is only him, playing like DSP and making stand-up tier jokes.

>>321244
What is it about modern society's obsession with making these "look bruh I'm way smarter and wittier than I look" movies?

Isn't he a jew?

>>321308
What do you think, anon?

>>321359
Looks irish to me

>>321336
>What are the must see Ray Harryhausen movies
My personal favorites are Mighty Joe Young (although not a pure Harryhausen movie), Mysterious Island, First Men in the Moon, and The 7th Voyage of Sinbad. Maybe The Valley of Gwangi too. I have to say that I'm not that big of a Harryhausen fan anymore though. The Dynamation process might have made stop-motion animation affordable, but I don't think it looks as good as the earlier animation. Willis O'Brien's animation might have been less smooth, but I still feel like his work has more character and also had the benefit of having other artists supporting him in his earlier projects and building nice scenery (although from what I remember Harryhausen reading had help building at least some of his models). Dynamation streamlined the process and placed more importance on projected images, but I think it's also less interesting. And it might sound like I'm missing the point, but a lot of the movies are pretty generic once you take the special effects out of the equation.

I think the two most recommended ones would be Jason and the Argonauts and The 7th Voyage of Sinbad. The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms has some historical value and might be worth watching in that regard. I haven't even seen it though.
>which ones can be skipped?
The 3 Worlds of Gulliver and the latter two Sinbad movies don't seem essential. I can't say whether they're any good or not, but they seem like they're definitely some of the least talked about. The 3 Worlds of Gulliver isn't really notable for having interesting creatures or anything either.

Watch them all.
t. Super Ramon

>>321218
What world do you live in where special effects are the primary attractant?
It's always Stars then IP.

>>321224
>What world do you live in where special effects are the primary attractant?
That was the case from the 90s to the early 2010s.
I know 6 people who stopped watching movies altogether because the CGI sucks.

>>321224
>Stars
Worthless in a post capeshit world

Already a thread, you stupid fuck.

>>321227
the fuck what???

Pirates of Caribe, In FtM waters

Looks like the original or second pirates of the Caribbean.

>>321312
>>321317
close very close but which one?

>>321318
I'll go with the second one anon.