/tv/ - Movies and Television

>>371398
Japan just hit different.

>>371380
You didn't disprove what he said, though. You're the one that mentioned Ramon first. Nobody was discussing Ramon until you did.

>>371599
Jav is superior to blacked to be honest.

>>371127
Bump for this

>>374240
they brought him back from the grave

>>374240
It makes me sick. Inhuman. VILE! NO!

>>374243
Same thing happened with Ray Liotta and Cocaine Bear.

I think that would make a good WFC theme for next year, film with an actor who died during post-production.

>>371888
Nuzach got arrested finally?

>>371892
Rent free

>>371898
Yeah, I guess he doesn't have to pay for room and board in prison.

>>371145
Only the first one got a real laugh.

>>374135
It's a movie about the first martyr.

>>374135
Mad mel's gonna add his trippy fanfic

>Finnish actor Jaakko Ohtonen plays Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson's upcoming two-part biblical epic The Resurrection of the Christ
wtf why didnt mel gibson cast a jew to play Jesus???

>>374140
Fuck dude woooooould

>>374168
agreed

>13-year-old cousin, Myra (Winona Ryder)

Gentlemen you had my curiosity … but now you have my attention

>BIG HARV'S CHOICE CUTS(Movie with the HARVesters hottest trade partner)
Ghost in the Shell (2017) would be most apropos.

>>374197
I don't really have any recommendations, but The Searchers is one of the few Westerns I like.

>>374173
You can always tell when you're talking to a Burgerlander because words (especially the political kind) mean essentially the opposite of their original meaning to them due to spending their lives immersed in the society that literally invented the study of propaganda.

'Left'? In Burgerland this is a synonym for Keynesian social democrats in love with identity politics.
'Liberal'? In Burgerland that means left, despite it being understood literally everywhere else in the world to mean the right-wing ideology that thinks capitalism is the best thing ever.
'Libertarian'? In Burgerland that means the most extreme advocate for corporate rule, despite it originally being coined to describe anarchists in France when the government banned explicit anarchists. Actual anarchists oppose capitalism by definition.
'Democracy'? In Burgerland that actually means the system of oligarchy pioneered by ancient Rome… which was actually diametrically opposed to contemporary democracies like Athens and Syracuse.

Just take a political word and imagine the opposite and you'll ironically have a more accurate understanding of politics in Burgerland.

>>374174
Great post.

>>374174
>'Left'? In Burgerland this is a synonym for Keynesian social democrats in love with identity politics.
Not true. The best definition of left vs. right in the modern day that I know of comes down to egalitarianism vs. hierarchy. Libertarians and Nazis are both considered rightists because they both highly emphasized different forms of hierarchy. For the libertarians it largely comes down to apologetics for economic stratification, and for the Nazis it was extreme national chauvinism.

Similarly, the left encompasses everything from bourgeois anti-white "queer ally" Democrats to radical anti-capitalists who hate their guts for being in bed with business interests and would gladly have them lined up against the wall come the revolution.

Also, "identity politics" is basically a redundant term. All politics is essentially "identity politics" because humans are social animals and are the product of broader cultural and biological forces. Unless you're some totally deracinated hyperindividualist, your identity will inevitably influence your politics. People making decisions based on their identity isn't an inherently bad thing.

>>374174
Not just Americans. I've seen this kind of retardation everywhere there are online discourses in English. It's the same thing as calling the Nazis "far right" - far right compared to whom and by what metric? If you ask this in an English-speaking community the majority of answers will be straight up bullshit.

>>374147
they've gone too far out on that limb. it's over.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lr2K71gtZk4&ra=m

>toy story 3 gave the franchise it's perfect conclusion
OH ARMOND

Bored Game.

by Armond White

Toy Story 3 suckers fans to think they can accept this drivel.

Pixar has now made three movies explicitly about toys, yet the best movie depiction of how toys express human experience remains Whit Stillman's 1990 Metropolitan. As class-conscious Tom Townsend (Edward Clements) tries fitting in with East Side debutantes, he discovers his toy cowboy pistol in his estranged father's trash. Without specifying the model, Stillman evokes past childhood, lost innocence and Townsend's longing for even imagined potency. But Toy Story 3 is so besotted with brand names and product-placement that it stops being about the innocent pleasures of imagination-the usefulness of toys-and strictly celebrates consumerism.

I feel like a 6-year-old having to report how in Toy Story 3 two dolls-Sheriff Woody (Tom Hanks) and Buzz Lightyear (Tim Allen)-try to save a toy box of childhood playthings from either disuse or imprisonment as donations to a daycare center because their human owner, 17-year-old Andy, packs them up as he heads off to college. The toys wage battle with the daycare center's cynical veteran cast-offs: Hamm the Piggy Bank pig, Lotsa Hugs and Big Baby. But none of these digital-cartoon characters reflect human experience; it's essentially a bored game that only the brainwashed will buy into. Besides, Transformers 2 already explored the same plot to greater thrill and opulence.

While Toy Story 3's various hazards and cliffhangers evidence more creativity than typical Pixar product (an inferno scene was promising, Lotsa Hugs' cannily evokes mundane insensitivity), I admit to simply not digging the toys-come-to-life fantasy (I don't babysit children, so I don't have to) nor their inevitable repetition of narrative formula: the gang of animated, talking objects journey from one place to another and back-again and again. It recalls how Tim Burton's atrocious Alice in Wonderland repeated narrative stasis without exercising the famous line: "It takes all the running you can do just to stay in the same place." Burton's omission of that legendary, therapeutic slogan parallels how Toy Story 3 suckers fans to think they can accept this drivel without paying for it politically, aesthetically or spiritually.

Look at the Barbie and Ken sequence where the sexually dubious male doll struts a chick-flick fashion show. Since it serves the same time-keeping purpose as a chick-Post too long. Click here to view the full text.

>>372966
>Metropolitan
I always found it weird that Tom was portrayed as the only neocommie of the bunch, and it's obvious he only got into that shit because he and his mother were forced to go down a peg in society after his dad left. His high-status, educated buddies would have been the more outspoken leftist-hedonists, even during the movie's late 80s-early 90s setting.

Private video
Sign in if you've been granted access to this video
Sign in
SHUT IT DOWN

>>374192
Some parodies are too hard-hitting I guess.

if there's no actual hardcore porn content there really is no point is there……

They saw how many people lined up to pay for the new Soyderman so it's not hard to believe some people would pay for lewds of a used-up hag.

Megan Fox has always felt like some kind of psyop to me. She's fucking ugly and looks like an alien and somehow we were all supposed to lust after her like a dog in Looney Tunes.

>It's a shame, MENKOES in the FAN game
>Only for the money and the fame (Extra large!)
I don't need no Louis, no cucky, just Black men, goddamit!
Never with Bruno Mars, I'm more like a Dredd fan