No.331158[Reply][Last 50 Posts]
Just saw Scaramouche (1952). An 18th century revenge tale about a man who plays a clown in a theater troupe by day as he plots to kill a heartless aristocrat by night to avenge the death of his best friend and foster brother.
The film feels very ahead of its time both visually and in terms of writing. This is probably because it blends elements of several different genres, which seems to have confused the critics of its day. It's essentially a swashbuckler but with a lot of time dedicated to political drama and comedy. It's also very risque for its time. As incongruent as this sounds, it actually balances these aspects rather well. The biggest weakness in the story is the ending, which feels somewhat underwhelming after everything building up to it and the final plot twist is more than a little hard to swallow. That being said, I don't think it detracts from the film too much.
The characters, even the side ones, are fairly strong and memorable and the acting is quite good as well. A few of the actors even act more like French actors than American ones. The villain is especially great. The only one of the main cast who feels like a typical Hollywood actor from the 50's is Janet Leigh but she's still adequate in her role.
The visuals, like I said, are ahead of their time. Only by a about a decade or so though; it certainly doesn't look modern. The most famous thing about this movie is the 5-minute long swordfight at the end. Despite its length, that fight scene is able to maintain a high level of excitement and tension throughout which is quite a feat since you know the hero is going to win in the end. There are many other swordfights in the movie too and they're all used pretty intelligently to serve the plot. What's nice about the fight scenes is that there's very little music in them and the silence helps tremendously.
Overall, I give Scaramouche an 8/10.
362 posts and 210 image replies omitted. Click reply to view. No.367644
>>367628>Youcis obviously want to suck Sancil's dickShe's married.
No.367665
>>367644Good for her.
Married people still have fantasies about people they interact with. Especially if the policy wonk in question looks like the dad that molested her.
No.367666
>>367665I don't think it's that deep, he's just some jerk who attacked her, so she decided to become a thorn in his side.
No.367676
Today I watched "Dead Ringers". I give this movie a 7.5/10. Jeremy Irons acting in it is superb. This movie was bizarre, perverted, and demented but I still enjoyed it because Irons acting was just that good. I don't want to spoil the plot, its so bizarre you just need to see it for yourself. A gynecologist makes tools for alien vaginas and does a lot of drugs. He has an identical twin brother. Lots of drugs, sex, dream symbolism, psychology. Its very weird. Jeremy Irons is a good actor, I don't think I could have finished this movie without him, its so perverse. I am the same anon who watched "Requiem for a Dream" earlier ITT and decided, screw it, I will just lean in and keep watching gross-out hardcore jewish smut until my body and soul taps out and I need a reprieve, lol.