>>284085>>284086>green filterAh yes, the radioactive fart cloud. Bethesda has schizophrenic designers. some parts will be so well built and filled in world wise, but there's no story, while others will be empty of anything but quest givers, and everything about the story is engaging and you could give a fuck about the environments. New Vegas had a tight story that was constantly calling back to itself but a lot of the world is just so flat and boring. 4's world is half finished and nearly empty story wise, but what is finished is dense and filled with nooks and crannies that would have made for great moments if there was some purpose for them to serve. 3 has the same problem, there's tons to explore and dig around into, but without any real reason other than 'it's there and you need ammo/stimpacks so you can get more ammo/stimpacks'.
Another of the issues is that while all the fallout games can be played out of the box, it takes an immense amount of modding to make the game actually work the way Bethesda or for NV Isles, want it too. In fact people spend more time modding fallout 4 into the stalker game they always wanted than they do actually playing fallout 4. Fallout 4's biggest success is that it makes a tolerable survival simulator out of an unfinished mess of a game. The east coast is practically wasted, they could have fit the far harbour dlc into that space (except that bethesda no bueno por optimization so everyone's computers or consoles would explode) and not a single thing from fallout 4's original map would have been missed.
Fallout seems like the series that every single person remembers as being something different from the next person, and I think it's a case of constantly falling upwards.
>>284087>More bland flat brown spaces…and JacobstownI liked that granny supermutant.
