[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]

/tv/ - Movies and Television

no girls allowed
[]
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]

  [Go to bottom]  [Catalog]  [Reload]  [Archive]

File: 1710955311838-0.png (485.11 KB, 640x480, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1710955311838-1.png (1.15 MB, 1024x683, 1024:683, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1710955311838-2.png (1.32 MB, 683x1024, 683:1024, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.331646[Reply]

Nickelodeon Producer Dan Schneider Responds to 'Quiet on Set' Accusations: 'I Owe Some People a Strong Apology'
Once heralded as the "Norman Lear of children's television" by the New York Times, former Nickelodeon producer Dan Schneider is now scrambling to save his reputation in the wake of the new docuseries Quiet on Set: The Dark Side of Kids TV, which explores allegations of child sexual abuse and other forms of misconduct in Hollywood.

Dan Schneider responded to the Investigation Discovery docuseries on Tuesday, saying "I definitely owe some people a pretty strong apology."

The docuseries alleges he oversaw toxic workplace conditions where young children were present, and he allegedly verbally abused the cast and crews of his shows.

One accuser - a female writer on The Amanda Show - claims Schneider watched pornography on his computer at work and once told her that he would put one of her sketches in the show in return for a massage - a request that he allegedly made of other co-workers.

Schneider spoke to the iCarly star known as BooG!E in a video interview that was obtained by The Hollywood Reporter.

"Watching over the past two nights was very difficult, me facing my past behaviors, some of which are embarrassing and that I regret and I definitely owe some people a pretty strong apology," he said.

When asked about the massages, Schneider said, "It was wrong. It was wrong that I ever put anybody in that position. It was a wrong thing to do. I'd never do it today. I'm embarrassed that I did it then. I apologize to anybody that I ever put in that situation."

Post too long. Click here to view the full text.
6 posts and 2 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.331677

>>331676
Vertigo

 No.331680

>>331650
It's weird how the public acts like Schneider being a pedophilic foot fetishist is an open secret, yet nobody in this documentary had anything more to say about him other than him saying hurtful words, allowing a bigoted workplace environment, making sexual jokes at the expense of others, watching porn on set, and overseeing some weird skits. The most questionable thing said is the skit of Dan and Amanda, and that's innocent compared to the wannabe Pogo turning Drake into a sex slave.

 No.331681

>>331646
>niglet is the only one not smiling

lel, they get hostile young

 No.331683

>>331680
It's plausible Schneider was just the smartest one of the bunch by not taking it too far. On the other hand, it's also plausible that Bynes was his personal sex slave, which would explain why she has gone bananas.

 No.332691

>>331646
interesting



File: 1712620990256.mp4 (1.72 MB, 720x784, 45:49, We can kill the pajeets no….mp4) ImgOps iqdb

 No.332675[Reply]

>HoLlyWOoD mOViE BUdgEtS aRe rEAl.
Kys, newfag, you bluepilled fuck. You sound so fucking bluepilled that you sound like a fucking kike.

Maybe they're going woke to kill the entire cinema going culture. I'd include the covid psyop in this process since it was so powerful at closing theaters and changing consumer habits.

There's not going to be just an over-saturation of movies. You will simply watch a new original movie every time you sit down at your couch or phone. Nobody will talk about the latest Simpson's episode ever again. Everybody will have their own solo tailored demographic.

The era we're living in right at this moment is so fucking fucked up, that people in the future won't even be able to comprehend it because they will have moved on with supreme content abundance the likes of which we can't even imagine right now.
1 post omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.332681

>>332680
How do you watch it over again if it never gets to the end?

 No.332682

>>332680
>People love watching the same things over and over again.
I stopped doing that in my early twenties.

 No.332683

>>332680
You won't be able to go back because AI will continue to progress, and the older stuff will be jarring by the advanced smoothness. I mean you can try, but what's the point unless you're studying the progression of AI?

 No.332684

>>332683
Do you think they will bring back dead actors with AI?

 No.332687

File: 1712640753544.webm (2.19 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, Tom Hanks snl df.webm) ImgOps iqdb

>>332684
kek
I think they already have.
Obviously we need some kind of new normal psyop, but eventually after that, yeah.



File: 1712639416534.png (700.97 KB, 581x581, 1:1, Dugin.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.332685[Reply]

Dividing eras of film into conventional decades is mistaken and inaccurate. I've found, and I think you will too, that the latter half of any given decade is more like the first half of the following decade than the first half of its own. For example, films made between 1945 and 1955 are far more similar to each other than they are to either the more optimistic films of 1935-1945 or the more subversive films of 1955-1965. 1965-1975 also forms a rather distinct epoch of aggressive experimentation and aggressive left-wing propaganda. 1995-2005 is the era with the last bit of soul in film while 2005-2015 is completely soulless but not completely unwatchable. 2015-2025, which we're in right now, is the age of pozzed loads and nostalgia bait.

The biggest possible holes in this theory, I suppose, would be the 20's and 80's, which had consistent styles and philosophies throughout. In the first case, I think that if you take a closer look, the late 1910's are more like the early 1920's than the late 20's are and that the films of the early 30's are extremely similar to those of the late 20's, with the only real difference being the presence of sound and the absence of caption cards. In the second case, the 80's, I think there's a pretty consistent style and look running about 1975 all the way through to about 1992 or 93 (the "long 80's" as I like to call it.) That was the mostly free of both the politicized experimentation of the early 70's and the cynical edginess that permeated most the 90's. It was also when they finally figured out how to make pretty much anything look good on film but before they began deliberately trying to make everything look ugly. That's probably why there's more nostalgia for that era than any other.

pic unrelated.

 No.332686

File: 1712640033222.jpeg (402.93 KB, 1152x2048, 9:16, GHeoyXZWcAAOJ_i.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

>>332685
I completely agree with just about everything you said. I don't think that's ever happened on an imageboard before for me in my life.

pic related



File: 1712631639320.png (992.6 KB, 1000x1001, 1000:1001, 1712045527990482.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.332679[Reply]

Are u happy


File: 1712617316403.png (334.83 KB, 900x900, 1:1, [email protected]) ImgOps iqdb

 No.332667[Reply]

PLease post top 10 waifu of all time

 No.332672

>>332667
Not sharing my instagram list with you, Zhang.



File: 1712572330288.jpg (58.7 KB, 450x445, 90:89, 1600652294142.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

 No.332619[Reply]

What did Dan "The Van Man" mean by this???

 No.332628

balls deep
imagine
imagine

 No.332629

>>332619
Everybody laughed at the sexual innuendos on these shows in the aughts. Now all these millennials have grown up and they're LARPing as neo-Puritans.

 No.332631

>>332629
That's what growing up means.
If our parents weren't overworked due to the inflation of the currency and prevalence of incentivized divorce, they would not have allowed their kids to watch this kike shit.

 No.332633

File: 1712591369880-0.png (473.49 KB, 1090x701, 1090:701, Screenshot from 2024-04-08….png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1712591369880-1.png (33.74 KB, 514x640, 257:320, Screenshot from 2024-04-08….png) ImgOps iqdb

Last month, they removed a bunch of Nick shows from Paramount+. It looks like mostly slop nobody watched, so far, they haven't come for any of the Schneider sex comedies. I'd recommend torrenting them if you want them because you never know.



YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.332271[Reply]

Another liberalist kino review

 No.332272

>>332271
Imagine having a handler and he tells you to review this movie.

 No.332274

Even Sam Hyde hated this garbage, american cuckservatives are bad optics to truly based NatSocs.

 No.332283

>>332274
It was produced by J.J. Abrams and Abby Shapiro's brother. We already had a thread on it.

 No.332334

Has anyone here actually seen the movie?
Also, the manlet angloid doing this review is becoming more and more pathetic and out of touch with every month that goes by. He used to make okay reviews, but all his recent stuff is pure garbage.

 No.332623

Why conservatives can't create art???



File: 1706444966475-0.jpg (173.2 KB, 1422x1650, 237:275, 85mi3fs54vd81.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1706444966475-1.jpg (151.77 KB, 1080x1198, 540:599, 1064ed138f9ba5e5a33ad637aa….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

 No.328808[Reply]

did Cameron Diaz really do porn before she broke out in Films?
31 posts and 4 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.329167

>>329138
latex fetish porn BTS exists somewhere.

 No.329796


 No.331287

>>328854
It's not her. Already debunked by Nastassia.

 No.331301

>>331287
>debunked by Nastassia
Welp, that settles it. She said it's not her, so it definitely isn't.

 No.332622




File: 1712553149534-0.png (697.01 KB, 1076x701, 1076:701, Anne.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1712553149534-1.webm (1.65 MB, 360x640, 9:16, anne heche lesbo role mod….webm) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1712553149534-2.mp4 (3.98 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, Actor Anne Heche Pops Up o….mp4) ImgOps iqdb

 No.332611[Reply]

I miss her so much, bros.

 No.332614

>It doesn't look that good…
>Yeah it does look terrible
lol



File: 1712550301887.gif (5.91 MB, 640x638, 320:319, nikocado-avocado-rage.gif) ImgOps iqdb

 No.332604[Reply]

gahoole where the fuck is the MLP review

 No.332606

You must have patients young fathopper, for all great kinos will come in time.

 No.332607

Yeah this is really bad seethe.

 No.332612

File: 1712554918123.png (253.7 KB, 347x591, 347:591, pig.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>332606
i will wait



  [Go to top]   [Catalog]
Delete Post [ ]
[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]
[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]