/tv/ - Movies and Television

Katie, a freelance video editor in desperate need of work, receives a high-paying offer to edit a cryptic and bizarre video from an anonymous employer. Strapped for cash and facing eviction, Katie eagerly accepts the gig. The video depicts people being tortured and even killed on camera - surely just elaborately staged fiction. But when the first job leads to even more lucrative work, and more disturbingly realistic snuff films, Katie's life begins to crumble. Strange figures in her apartment, horrific nightmares keeping her awake, and a mysterious illness plaguing her cat. It's only when Katie decides to finally quit the job that she learns just how cruel her anonymous employer really is, and to what bloody lengths she herself will go to get out of her contract.

WILL KATIE GET OUT OF HER CONTRACT?

WILL SHE BE IN THE NEXT SNUFF FILM?

FIND OUT FOR THIS LATE VOD TUESDAY OFFERING ROLLING INTO WEDNESDAY!

This was the only good movie any of the actors in this movie (besides Willis and Keitel) have ever been in. Prove me wrong.

After Macs finds his pride which was the most retarded, lame display of faggotry, self gratifying shallow trash. Its never been the same. You could see the show going backwards but , my God that episode was a pipe full of sewer water from San Franciscos vile sodomite pit of hate. From what I have seen from there podcast Rob is basically another sociopath leftard rot worshiper. I honestly hope Rob gets raped by a pack of niggers.

>Kaitlin olsons face
Don't know what in the fuck happened there but, its not even pointed out she looks a retired las vegas hooker.

>Writing
It got much worst when Rob got more involved then became reddit tier chatgpt writing.

what happens when you let pandering and virtue signalling get in the way and destroy Artistic Creativity and most importantly….critical thinking

Are Anne Bronte's novels really that bad?

NEW YORK (AP) - Harvey Weinstein is due back in court Wednesday as a judge is set to decide when the disgraced movie mogul's #MeToo retrial will start and whether it will include an allegation involving a woman who wasn't in the original case.

Weinstein, 72, wants the extra charge thrown out, arguing through lawyers that Manhattan prosecutors only brought it to bolster their case with a third accuser after New York's highest court overturned his 2020 conviction on rape and sexual assault charges involving two women.

Judge Curtis Farber is expected to rule on that and other matters, including the trial date - a task that's been complicated by an increasingly crowded court calendar.

Weinstein's lawyer, Arthur Aidala, is representing conservative strategist Steve Bannon in a border wall fraud trial that's set to start March 4 before a different Manhattan judge. Meanwhile, Farber has a murder trial in March.

Before Bannon's trial date was set last week, Aidala had suggested that Weinstein's trial go first in "the interest of humanity," citing the ex-studio boss' declining health.

Weinstein is being treated for numerous medical conditions, including chronic myeloid leukemia and diabetes.

"They know that Mr. Weinstein is dying of cancer and is an innocent man right now in the state of New York," Aidala argued in court last week. He pleaded to prosecutors: "Can I try this dying man's case first?"

Weinstein is being retried on charges that he forcibly performed oral sex on a movie and TV production assistant in 2006 and raped an aspiring actor in 2013. The additional charge, filed last September, alleges he forced oral sex on a different woman at a Manhattan hotel in 2006.
Post too long. Click here to view the full text.