No.6880
>>6879Oh no. What happened?
No.6881
>>6880Sony meddled with Stellar Blade and added a day one patch that covers up some of the costumes, the edits aren't even good and just makes everything look worse. The launch version is still available on disc with the original costumes so they are 100% not redesigns.
As always, it falls to modders to fix this injustice when the port arrives
No.6882
>>6880Trannies at Soyny are having monumental, drug fueled, sleep at work meltdowns editing a beautiful game to protect their twitter tranime profiles from self-esteem damage.
No.6883
>>6881So they got rid of the cameltoe?
No.6885
>>6884I don't have a dog in this fight because I don't have a PS5, but all the guys who bought this game should file a class-action lawsuit to get their money back, because the game was sold under false pretenses.
No.6886
>>6885Trannies made the edits in self-defense. Their lives were threatened. Nobody is at fault.
No.6887
I think it's just a marketing gimmick.
Nobody would have bought this game except a few PS5 owners.
Now everybody is talking about it.
No.6888
>>6887The gimmick was the T&A, a lot of people bought the game for that. You can't just forcibly remove it after you take their money. People need to sue over this shit.
No.6889
>>6888Controversy has more traction than simple sex I think. I mean publicly, the t&a is the marketing gimmick, but behind the scenes… I don't know… Just seems like they could cook this up.
No.6891
>>6888>You can't just forcibly remove it after you take their money.What do you mean 'forcibly'? The licensee is told of their rights and what the terms of the license are for the software. In Europe they have more rights thanks to the Digital Content Directive but the owner is still allowed to modify products afterwards for a variety of reasons as long as the licensee is notified properly.
No.6892
>>6891>the owner is still allowed to modify products afterwards for a variety of reasons as long as the licensee is notified properly.Modifying the software is allowed for pragmatic reasons, such as bugfixes and optimizations. Pulling the rug out a few days after the game's release by changing key elements of the game, elements which may have had a significant impact on a consumers decision to purchase the game, is at best unethical, at worst grounds for the consumer to seek remedy. The patch should be optional if anything.
No.6894
>>6893Damn… that is actually a good metaphor.
No.6895
>>6893Seriously, imagine buying videogames anymore. Imagine, in the year 2024, inflation rampant, economy in the shitter, actually
giving money to sony or any other videogame developer. Could you imagine? It couldn't be me. Never has been, either. People
PAY these people. Really think about how absurd that is.
No.6898
>>6895You will never be black.
No.6902
>>6900>>when the port arrivesYes,
when, there's no such thing as exclusives anymore.
No.6910
>>6895It has proven that Sony executives bent over so far to the marxists to the point of feeling their dildos reaching their teeth and r/etards still went apeshit because they couldn't obtain the overpriced piece of shit that doesn't do the fucking thing it's supposed to do, scalpers did a favor to them hogging all the CCP spyware.
STILL NO FUCKING EXCLUSIVES BESIDES A RE-RE-RELEASE OF GTA 5You want the equivalent of a kidney stone? Watch this:
https://yewtu.be/watch?v=9ED917l7Yjo No.6919
>>6891>It's muh private company!Kys
No.6920
>>6918Fans of the above are all fans of the below though.
No.6921
>>6920I never played The Trannies of US 2 and always thought the first Trannies was liberal shit.
No.6925
>>6923Yakuza won.
Gahoole is under jav mk ultra
No.6926
>>6893Did Sony force anyone to connect their PS5 to the internet? Is it their fault the user is too stupid to go into the settings and disable automatic updates if they don't want them? Why is anyone pretending this is a big deal when the update can be deleted and the original game resinstalled from disc?
People that buy the digital version get what they deserve.
No.6927
>>6921I assumed it was gay porn lol
No.6928
>>6926I'd imagine a ps5 without the internet is like a phone without cell service or the internet.
No.6931
>>6928My neighbor had a PS5 without internet access for awhile. It's no different than a PS1; you put a game disc in and it plays. Demos he downloaded earlier he couldn't save progress on locally as those used a cloud saving system but that was the only limitation.
All the extra functionality provided by the internet isn't much asides for multiplayer.
No.6933
>>6926>>6931I want no censorship and bugfixes and performance improvements. And all DLC, bonus content and expansions. So I'll think I'll just pirate it actually. Sony has no pride in the game, so they won't mind giving it to me for free
No.6934
>>6933>playing a shitty version of western/jap gamesngmi
No.6935
>costumes censored
>gore censored
>people actually paid money to get fucked in the ass
>there are people who actually DEFEND THIS like josh moon
No.6936
>>6935The censorship was an attempt by journalists and even the developer to kill their own game. By still buying it you're "owning" them because of the original Stellar Blade message.
I say boycott everything buy if still buying this game makes journalists seethe, then do it. Basically, just do whatever makes gaming journalists mad.
No.6937
>>6934I enjoyed Lies of P more than Elden Ring, if anything ER feels like the shitty ripoff.
>>6936>The censorship was an attempt by journalists and even the developer to kill their own game.I don't buy that this was the devs choice since the censored costumes are so hastily done and obviously not intentional redesigns.
No.6938
It's such a weirdly specific change, it unironically feels like some kind of humiliation ritual (as the kids say)
>haha, we changed this costume, to a slightly less sexy version, but the game still has costumes where the protagonist is basically naked!
All I can see this as is someone drawling a line in the sand and saying "fuck you, we'll censor whatever we want, and you can't stop us". What else could possibly have possessed them to do it?
It puts the anti-censorship crowd in this awkward position where they have to take a principled stance against the unashamed coomer game, because the developers technically engaged in censorship.
No.6965
>>6964Holy fuck I love seeing these newfag reactions to gahoole.
No.6966
>>6964LLOOOK AT HIS FUCKING EYES AHAHHAHAHAHAHHA