>>140312Ok, so you weren't playing stupid.
Whether or not she made a logical argument was never contested.
What was contested was the fact that everything you initially stated was illogical.
When I attempted to point it out to you, you misunderstood most of my arguments, and you offered counter-arguments to misunderstood arguments.
>So again, what exactly do you disagree with that I said? Other than that it's funny?You want to just start over?
>I like this content because exposing how these rights are violations of privacy are probably the only way to convince the public.Surveillance is not the same thing as a person holding a camera in your face. Surveillance is a means to catch criminals and stop crime, and it's expected that the implementation of surveillance systems are used with responsible oversight. In any event, there is no public protest because people are complying with the cost of enforcing laws through surveillance. Normal people are also blissfully ignorant, and they won't become bothered by non-invasive systems unlike someone holding a camera pointing at their ass. If there needs to be a debate about surveillance, this sort of camera activism isn't actually representative of the counter-point because surveillance is non-invasive.
Your stance on public recording contradicts the fact that you like the content. Your enjoyment comes from laughing at a woman that you think is in the wrong for wearing a thong on a beach. It's socially acceptable to stare directly at a sunset or the waves, not a woman's ass as she sun bathes. She expects people to glance as they walk by or hang out in the vicinity because that's normal behavior regardless if there is a thong involved or not.
I also accused you of pushing some kike mgtow bullshit by accusing women of wanting to dictate what men can look at which you misunderstood to mean literal fucking head of state dictators because you're a fucking idiot.
The debate spiraled into several other points of interest as statements were made along the way.
>>140313>And all this because of some bizarre need to whitenightI already addressed this, but I suspect you did not read. If I were on the beach near them, and I had to hear this shit, I would be irritated simply because there's a faggot with a camera referencing the law. If I'm on the beach, I don't want to hear some faggot making a woman upset. I don't care who she is. If you bring technology to the beach, in most cases it's a phone, it's for emergencies, or to take pictures of the ocean, not people. It's simple etiquette. The roles could be reversed, and I'd be equally annoyed.