>>344653Again with the "Romantic" language. Can you define what do you mean by that? because I don't think it means what you think it means.
>Not a fan of Cyrillic either.That's a writing system, not a language, so I guess you have no problem with spoken Russian, so go enjoy some Tarkovsky kino or if you want something closer to English, how about some Ingmar Bergman cinema?
>>344649>the bibleUnironically it's a very complex and long book, so anyone who manages to actually read the entire Bible can read almost any other book.
>An unknown error occured when posting!It might have been becasue I used
Cyrillics when writing the word 'kino' as part of a small joke.