No.359952
Because family goy is all over tiktok and jewtube, also shit thread OP.
No.359962
>>359952This is your answer, OP.
No.359968
>>359951Was Family Guy ever even that good? From the little I've seen of it, I doubt it.
>>359964Is this Nuzach's latest way of shitting up the board?
No.359971
>>359964
The ifunny watermark makes it
No.359980
>>359973Bob's burger is zoomer simpsons for sure, timewise at least.
No.359998
Both are good shows ^_^
No.360005
>>359980While F is for Family is collecting dust, there was a scene of the potheads bringing up the Talmud because one of them is a jew and he was giving a warning about the dangers of dating jewy girls whoring themselves before taking seriously their relationship: Making the whole cartoon a deal breaker with the terminal online to not share such niche jokes as memes.
No.360017
>>359973Bob's Burgers doesn't seem to have the same impact as the other two. It has its fans, but it's not a household name. Probably because it aired when television itself was losing its influence on culture.
No.361627
Because family is newer than the Simpsons
No.361641
>>361627It's still 26 years old. If newness were what mattered, they would be championing Bob's Burgers more than anything.
No.361642
>>359951Zooms grew up with Family Guy assuming the average 30 year old isn't a young millenial.
the humor of zoomers even comes from not getting the references in Family Guy or Futurama. It just turns into random access humor like Chris Chan.
No.361643
>>36164230 would be 94 or 95 birthyear so that would be young millenial
No.362161
>>359952Can't forget the subway surfaces gameplay next to it
No.362169
>>361642I think its funny cause chris always made references to things he didn't know about like stardate from strek even though he never watched it.
No.362235
>>362233>>3616431985-1989 is core millennial. Mid 1996 is zillennial territory.
No.362237
>>362233The best part about being born on that timeframe is doing a kike and being part of a single of those gens only when it's convinient.
No.362250
>>362233Even your meme shows 1996 to 1998. 94 to 95 is close but its like borderline zillenial/millennial
No.362251
I've always considered 93 the cutoff year and everything after to be gen z
No.362278
>>362251That's earlier than almost every publication. 1997 is the starting year for gen z for almost all official sources including pew, merriam webster dictionary, us census bureau and statistics canada.
No.362279
>>362278It changes constantly. Everyone used to say 95 was the starting year.
No.362280
>>362279At one point everyone born up to 2000 were considered millennials.
No.362300
>>362279Damn TIL. I see a 2015 CBS article saying 1995 is their starting gen z year and a 2017 book called "igen" that lists 95 as gen z starting year as well. I didnt even know the term gen z back then lol
I think it was like 2018 where i first learned of the term "gen z" and started looking them up. I wonder why they decided to change the starting year cuz 1997 is now the most commonly cited . It was pew research that did so in an article they published in 2019
No.362302
https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/meet-generation-z/9/2015 cbs article. Lmao at describing gen z as hardworking and conscientious that didnt age well
No.362303
Generation cohorts are B.S. Baby boomers apparently were between 1946 to 1964. 18 years span, how are people born that far apart part of the same generation? Someone born in 1946 surely has more in common with someone born in 1940 than they would with someone born in 1960 for example. The same can be said about all generations.
No.362304
>>362303It's all pilpul designed to divide Whites into opposing camps, and you see it all the time with people blaming different generations for problems, which has the effect of people losing sight of the overarching jewish problem.
No.362311
>>362303Lol theyre formed from key historical events and tech not time spans. Everyone born in the entire 10th century is basically part of the same generation while the 20th century is ofc like 7 generations, cuz tech progressed 10000x more
No.362312
>>362311Even then, the definition still fails. A person born in the late 40s would have been shaped by early cold war paranoia, the post-war economic boom, the civil rights movement, and early television, and they would have been just barely old enough to participate in the social revolutions of the 60s. Meanwhile, someone born in the early 60s probably wouldn't even be old enough to remember much of the chaos of that decade, and would already be in the age of Reagan, home computers, video games, and MTV by the time they were an adult.
No.362319
>>362312Just because one generations definition isnt good doesnt mean the idea of generations isnt valid. Boomers i agree has too wide a range. But home computers didnt saturate the market until late 90s and early 2000s (in the states at least)
https://www.statista.com/statistics/214641/household-adoption-rate-of-computer-in-the-us-since-1997/ No.362320
>>362313A 1947 early boomer wud have been an 18 year old college student in 1965 in the midst of the social changes, perfect context and age for that kind of stuff. But yea later boomers for sure wud be too young like a 64 boomer.
No.362362
>>362319>Just because one generations definition isnt good doesnt mean the idea of generations isnt valid. Boomers i agree has too wide a range.Millennials have too wide a range as well. A person born in 96 would have lived most of their lives with web 2.0 and post-9/11 insanity, and wouldn't have become a legal adult until Obama's second term. That's a completely different world from someone who was born in 81 and became an adult in 1999.
Zoomers might also be too wide, but it's still a bit early to tell. I get the feeling that the younger ones who were still kids during the covid lockdown and who are now growing up with AI will turn out very different from the older ones born in the late 90s.
I guess Gen X sort of works.
>But home computers didnt saturate the market until late 90s and early 2000s (in the states at least)Fair enough.
No.362363
>>362362Yea for sure but thats what makes generationology so fascinating, its so endlessly subjective you can basically think about it all day
And its only enabled by the speed of modern progress
Im 1993 and i feel more like a millenial even tho a lot consider my year "zillenial ". i can fairly easily code switch tho but besides that i dont really have any zoomer traits. I dont watch shit on fast forward , i find those tiktok "edits" cringey, and dont do 4 things at a time lol. I also prefer a bigger screen . I dont see how zoomies play games and watch movies on 6 inch phones.
I remember only a little bit of the 90s and dial up. I stopped using vhs tapes at 12-13 (poorcel) and saw cds and mp3 players dying out and being replaced by digital. And even now its funny just within the past 10 years we went from downloads to streaming. Downloads vs streaming cud be something that separates young and old zoomers lol. Or alphas vs zoomers
No.362364
>>36236293 guy here again yea the older millenials i talk to seem noticeably more calm and relaxed than me. Prolly cuz they didnt start having social media and instagram starting at 18 like us younger millenials
Like i know an 83 millenial and hes so much more chill than me, and kinda quaint in how he uses his real name on his social media accounts. A zillenial wud never do that
No.362366
>>362363>And even now its funny just within the past 10 years we went from downloads to streaming.Still torrenting because it's just better than using dodgy streaming websites, and I like to keep copies.
No.362367
>>362366For what? For movies and shows i download but for music i use brave browser which lets me listen to youtube with the screen turned off
No.362368
>>362367I assumed you meant TV and movies since we're on /tv/, and I agree streaming is more practical for music.
No.362369
>>362367>>362368I still buy CDs.
No.362370
>>362369Do you like to sniff the inserts?
No.362378
>>362370I rip the files onto my desktop then put them in a bin.
No.362393
>>362363>Im 1993 and i feel more like a millenial even tho a lot consider my year "zillenial "I'm slightly older than you, but growing up I felt like I belonged to an older generation than my peers due to being culturally disconnected from them. It was a weird feeling realizing that Miley Cyrus was my age and not born years after me. Maybe it's partially related to me having siblings who are noticeably older, but think there's more to it than that.
>I dont watch shit on fast forwardFor me it depends. I do it for podcasts and stuff like, but never movies. I don't think that's just a zoomer thing, but I imagine zoomers do it the most.
>I remember only a little bit of the 90s and dial up. I stopped using vhs tapes at 12-13 (poorcel) and saw cds and mp3 players dying out and being replaced by digital.My family got a DVD player in like 1998, but my household was still phasing out VHS tapes into the 2000s. The last new tape I remember us getting new was the extremely cheesy Pendragon Pictures version of The War of the Worlds from 2005 thinking it looked interesting in the store, but I still bought a few used tapes off the Internet after that time.
>>362366100%. I keep hard drives full of TV, movies, music, games, and books to make sure I'll always have them.
No.364907
Real zoomers need to pretend they watch anything other than porn, so they lie about being fans of a show they can meme about without actually watching.