[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]

/tv/ - Movies and Television

no girls allowed
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1759505184882.jpeg (324.48 KB, 1200x1778, 600:889, proxy-image.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

 No.364638

Just saw this. Literally dup btfo the movie. Dare I say, liberalkino, if that even exists.

Heard it was good and went in blind to watch it; since it was made by Paul Thomas Anderson I gave it a shot.

Right off the bat they make sure what the 'revolution' is about and the first 30mins or so is straight up a modern dup hating libshit fantasy filled with degenerate shit like mindless interracial sex, race mixing, cuckshit, hypocrite white supremacists, you name it, disgusting crap that you could only fathom if you like that shit. Once that part is over and they time skip ahead when the real plot begins then it gets a bit more interesting and more palpable.

It's shot well and acted well and if you are able to fathom the liberal power fantasy then you might even enjoy it.

Overall, pirate/10, i regret paying money to see it. If this is what passes for a great movie now then hollykike and film goers sure are starved for anything half decent.

 No.364639

File: 1759505654473.jpg (252.15 KB, 1734x1300, 867:650, 20251001_184706.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>trumpcuck
<I regret paying to see it because I love drumpf

I will now gladly pay money to see it. Thanks and fuck you.

 No.364640

>>364639
Shut up retard, i don't even care about dup. They could've role reversed the entire thing and it still would've been lame.

 No.364651

Sounds like absolute kino, maybe I'll even see it in a theater.

 No.364652

File: 1759510216338.jpg (121.29 KB, 1500x903, 500:301, paul-reubens-life-in-photo….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>364651
Try not to end up like Pee-wee.

 No.364680

Post the Armond White review

 No.364681

File: 1759535340209.mp4 (2.19 MB, 426x426, 1:1, Ramon playing pool in Braz….mp4) ImgOps iqdb

>>364638
This looks dumb. I don't need any more pozz in my life.

>>364639
>throwing a tantrum

I'm not kidding, you need to kill yourself. It'd be happier than continuing as you are.

 No.364682

File: 1759535711553.jpg (53.15 KB, 500x500, 1:1, louis-ck11.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>364651
>watching "mindless interracial sex, race mixing, cuckshit" in the theaters

You have followed my teachings well, my children.

 No.364689

>>364639
Dup being an orange moron doesn't mean his so-called "political opponents" are preferable. They would even go so far as botting YouTube comments to make it seem that the out of Africa theory is already an established fact that they verified themselves with time travel.

 No.364699

File: 1759564982891.jpg (1001.6 KB, 2000x3000, 2:3, MV5BZWY5ZDVjNTUtODI5Yy00Mj….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>364638
>poster is leo's face in the background
Exactly the same as his previous movie

 No.364700

>>364699
That movie was fucking terrible lol

 No.364703

>>364689
>>364681
You little pussies will suck the most orange, Zio Republican dick because you are so scared shitless of libs and niggers. Trumpcucks all!

 No.364706

File: 1759587725396.jpeg (17.14 KB, 385x443, 385:443, images-4.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

>>364703
Try harder

 No.364707

>>364703
You should cry impotently more!

 No.364709

File: 1759591245792.jpg (8.71 KB, 250x232, 125:116, armond king of tv.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>364680

There Will Be Bloodlust in One Battle After Another

Anderson's reckless ode to radical terrorism.

By Armond White

Paul Thomas Anderson's decision to avoid depicting the political turmoil of the past ten years but to romanticize Sixties political violence in his new film One Battle After Another is a cowardly artistic choice. Adapting Thomas Pynchon's novel Vineland is merely an excuse for Anderson to revive his own hipster fetishes - pop music, outré sex-and-violence, plus half-comic secular moralizing.

It starts with Anderson's recall of the social chaos in which druggy white California revolutionary Bob (Leonardo DiCaprio) and his black radical consort Perfidia (Teyana Taylor) attack an immigrant detention center, combating the government, represented by military operative Lockjaw (Sean Penn). Their mismatch parodies Vietnam and civil rights era clashes, as if the actual bombings, gunfire, killings, and riots from the Weather Underground to the Black Panthers were laughable counterculture-versus-establishment skirmishes. Anderson's tomfoolery makes stealthy comment on the battle between liberals and conservatives that has now become lethal. What's meant to be entertaining is actually callous, dishonest, and reprehensible.

This fantasy may coincide with contemporary turmoil, but its mixture of political absurdity, comic bloodshed, and racial farce merely exploits Millennial confusion. Despite its source in Pynchon's postmodern paranoia (the subject of Anderson's earlier adaptation Inherent Vice), the film's dystopic vision feels modern mostly because it follows the chic progressivism that Hollywood has embraced since the advent of Barack Obama.

Anderson's Bob-Perfidia-Lockjaw triangle (each name an overly literary pun) is a Pynchon-ization of the conflicts that resulted from Obama's personal link with Weather Underground radical Bill Ayers and the racial ambiguity that underscored his effect on the American polity.

One Battle After Another is not the first post-Obama movie (Harvey Weinstein once bragged about "the Obama Effect" on Hollywood), but its emphasis on political, racial, and sexual division operates on a new level. Anderson's large-scale convoluted storyline of multiple characters, quarrels, vendettas, and hostilities actually reflect the Biden era, which provided liberal Hollywood an opportunity to indulge its screwiest fantasies about our national polarization.

Some of Anderson's madhouse satire is spot-on. Since his nostalgic Licorice Pizza, he has learned to particularize the indie eccentricities that made his earlier movies seem gnomic. The most politically astute scene shows a pothead radical getting stoned while watching The Battle of Algiers. Bob, Perfidia, and Lockjaw go through variations on "new consciousness" apparent in their individual subcults: French 75 (for the left), Christmas Adventure Club (for the right,) and Sisters of the Brave Beaver (for disenchanted black feminists).

Anderson's pop music hipsterism swaps past romantic associations for new cynicism: "Soldier Boy," by the Shirelles, turns the S/M sex play between Perfidia and Lockjaw into civil rights irony; "Ready or Not," by the Delfonics, makes that same irony bewildering; "Dirty Work" uses Steely Dan snark to portray Bob's cuckoldry; "Hark the Herald Angels Sing" tweaks our shared disillusionment - particularly revolting in the Benecio Del Toro subplot that exalts the harboring of illegal aliens. Worst of all, Anderson uses Tom Petty's "American Girl" to ridicule the results of what Obama called "America's original sin."

That passion play is faultlessly enacted by DiCaprio (a whiz at divided consciousness, as in Once Upon a Time in Hollywood), Penn (who stresses right-wing racist ambivalence just as he stressed gay self-righteousness in Milk), and Taylor (who makes black female pathology a secondary sexual trait as when firing a machine gun while pregnant - a lewd signifier that outdoes everything in Ryan Coogler's Sinners). The consequence of this comic book trio's ideological orgy is a biracial daughter named Willa (Chase Infiniti) who inherits her elders' murderous impulses. ("Maybe you will save the world" is her mother's bequest.) Thus, she's the film's American Girl heroine - an obscenity. A product of ideological miscegenation, Willa embodies a problem that not even social satirist Pynchon imagined. But Anderson merely insinuates its obvious Obama-based subtext - the generational identity crisis apparent in Willa's oddball biracial, nonbinary friends who are briefly caricatured. Willa's confusion goes unexplored.

Anderson's perversion extends to his imitation of bad '70s aesthetics. The lighting makes the film look almost colorless, intensifying only for a hilly car chase that is edited incoherently; it's the one sequence where the IMAX imagery is notable yet boxy, like early television.

It's a macabre coincidence that One Battle After Another opens so soon after the assassination of peaceable conservative debater Charlie Kirk. The film undeniably romanticizes political assassination. When Perfidia seduces Lockjaw, she taunts him with "Revolutionary violence is the only way!" Anderson intentionally provokes the bloodlust of his woke confreres (and Gen Z viewers who know nothing about the Sixties) by celebrating the insipid, heretical, and violent activities of the liberal past and present. Anderson's title lacks Pynchon's pith but daydreams a culture of never-ending political obstruction and pandemonium. It is the year's most irresponsible movie.

 No.364710

File: 1759591612367.jpg (66.87 KB, 416x625, 416:625, armond white hat.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

Sleeper-Cell Critics Battle America

Smoking out sedition in the hype for One Battle After Another

by Armond White

Critic John Demetry called out the "sleeper cells" of film reviewers who joined the media mob praising One Battle After Another, and his ire could have gone further. The politicization of Hollywood can no longer be denied after P. T. Anderson's openly seditious One Battle After Another invaded movie theaters. This politicization includes the Hollywood press: Critics and editors exceeded their usual embarrassment as shills; One Battle has exposed the political bias in the trade press's routine. These reviewers broadcast their political preference by extolling a movie that is indifferent to life.

Describing how "film critics are already splooging over [One Battle] to an absurd degree," gadfly blogger Sasha Stone on Awards Daily writes that "in the fever dream of today's Left, we live in 'a fascist police state.'" That's been the mindset of mainstream journalism ever since Dean Baquet, former executive editor of the New York Times, overturned journalistic standards following President Trump's 2016 election, and almost every other news organization followed his lead. The media's hysterical praise of One Battle sneaks pronouncements about the national condition into what should simply be art criticism or narrative recaps.

The façade of critical impartiality has dropped. One Battle and the obvious activist intentions of its celebrants are what Obama likes to call "an inflection point." Adopting the "threat to democracy" cliché threatens film culture. It's especially harmful that Anderson's spectacle of cartoon political violence arrives immediately after Charlie Kirk's assassination and during the first crackdown on Antifa terrorism.

Movie-lovers, liberal or conservative, can be slow to catch on to the political motive behind widely hyped releases, but after the barely hidden propaganda in reviews of One Battle, it should be impossible for filmgoers to pretend that movies are not political but just entertainment. This should especially alarm conservatives whose low voices barely combat mainstream dread, ugliness, and dissension. One Battle has given leftists the ballast they need to continue their insane battle against the right. Anderson's deluded, romantic idea of liberal Sixties and Seventies militancy versus racist establishment tradition pits audiences against each other. That conflict is spurred by Times and New Yorker raves that continue the partisan editorial policies of those publications.

Anderson's cheerleaders aren't heralding great filmmaking; they're inflating their leftist bubble. This also happens with less serious movies such as Barbie, Dune, Everything Everywhere All at Once, and Superman, and it passes without remark because hegemony demands that it not be recognized or divulged; naïve readers think the movies are just an innocent good time.

Only a political idiot would mistake One Battle for escapism. Note Richard Lawson's Hollywood Reporter review that sees in the movie "a chilling resemblance to real men operating in our world today." He adds, "It is certainly a refreshing jolt to see a big picture like this analyze the squalid motivations of the people currently dispatching the National Guard to major cities and empowering ICE to spread far and wide in its cruel project."

Variety also raved stupidly ("a vision of a society in captivity," burped Owen Gleiberman), but Lawson couldn't resist confessing his allegiance to open-borders NGOs: He gushes about One Battle scenes in which Benicio Del Toro's character "secretly works to ferry targeted immigrants to safety" in a process that's "a clever and orderly network of seemingly anonymous people performing clandestine miracles." Lawson says that this aspect of the movie is "inspiring in its testament to mutual aid while sorrowful that such things have to exist at all." Continuing in editorial mode, Lawson reveals what he admires in the plot but disdains about the current administration: "a communal bond which no repressive government can truly understand or tear asunder." And, as a kicker, he concludes, "The title of the film could be read as an exhausted lament. It could be a rallying cry, too." This isn't art appreciation; it's sleeper-cell advocacy, paving the way for the next anti-government thrill ride or assassination.

A skeptic on social media gave the movie a new nickname: not OBAA, but "OOBAA, or One Obama Battle After Another," for the way it seems to justify fashionable anti-Americanism by virtue of its $150 million budget and the imprimatur of major media company Warner Bros. Discovery, whose properties include CNN, HBO, and DC Comics. The money spent suggests that hipster-nihilist Anderson and his followers must be on the right side of history. Rather than examining that position, reviewers urge that we buy into it.

Sasha Stone's diatribe against the industry dissects the problem:

>The Democrats lost for the same reason Hollywood is now collapsing or barely surviving. Because they don't see America anymore. . . . They have never learned their lessons of 2016. They have spent ten years demonizing, dehumanizing, and blaming the Right for their failures.


Entertainment media fail when reviewers cannot analyze Hollywood's current distortions. Ideology itself now determines the industry's aesthetics.

Casual filmgoers should realize that the politics in One Battle After Another are facetious and dishonest - that DiCaprio, Sean Penn, Del Toro, and P. T. Anderson are just playing out their liberal Hollywood death wish (to America). One NRO reader perceived in One Battle a "seething disdain for middle America and conservatism," yet it appears whenever mainstream scribes flaunt their arrogance.

Read Anderson's film, and its praise, the right way: as an enemies-within "comedy." Activist-critics who know nothing about politics prove they also know nothing about movies.

 No.364746

>>364639
You're willing to blow your welfare check just to pwn your imaginary boogeymen? That is so peak /tvch/omo.

 No.364754

>>364709
>>364710
Armond raping the jews as usual

 No.364761

>>364703
>post btfos both dup and woketards
<d-drumpfcuck!!
Esoteric Nuzachism

 No.364783

>>364709
>>364710
He's spot on here.

 No.364786

>>364754
10/7 is coming up show some respect

 No.364787

>>364786
Nobody gives a fuck about October 7th anymore when Israel is in the middle of committing genocide.

 No.364789

>>364787
Seethe harder for (((us))) nordcuck.

 No.364800

File: 1759791450528.webm (4.96 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, a8d1dd841248b584dd25d2e50….webm) ImgOps iqdb

>>364787
It doesn't help the Jews that it's been over 65 years since the October 7th attack.

 No.364817

>Literally no replies talking about the movie, just dupsperging
Film discussion is dead here.

 No.364818

>>364817
Political concepts were directly mentioned in the OP.

 No.364819

>>364817
Ramonposting killed the site.

 No.364820

File: 1759828549602.png (29.64 KB, 300x300, 1:1, 1611173583371.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>364819
Nope. Ramonposting is mostly a reaction toward the site's current lolcow. I didn't even find Ramon very funny until he started throwing constant fits about the meme.

What makes things worse is that a lot of people seem burned out on movies. I have no problems finding new stuff to watch and make posts about them on here, but I have no real interest in seeing new releases.

 No.364822

File: 1759829511633.jpg (325.42 KB, 1600x2398, 800:1199, P.T. Anderson-02.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

Alright, OP here I'll try to get the ball rolling.

>Paul Thomas Anderson

I've heard good things about him but this was the first movie of his that I saw. He's made movies like Boogie Nights, There will be blood, The Master, Phantom Thread etc which are critically acclaimed and he's said to be one of the film auteurs of the 21st century.
Some of these are on my backlog but I haven't seen any of his other films, so is he actually that great or is he an overrated hack? Just based off this movie, I guess he has the capability to make a good film if it isn't full of cuckshit.

 No.364823

>>364822
I watched Boogie Nights a while ago but don't even remember if it was any good or not. That's his only movie I've watched, so even if I had a stronger recollection of it it wouldn't be much to go off. There Will Be Blood is one on my personal backlog, even if I'm usually hesitant to watch movies from the second half of the 2000s. Most of his other movies don't seem like the sort of thing that would be up my alley.

 No.364833

>>364820
Coonseether is responsible, personally, for the Ramonissance that's happened over the past few years on tvch. If he'd have shut the fuck up years ago Ramon would've probably gone the way of the Orsonpost.

 No.364838

>>364828
They tend to feel too modern for my tastes. By 2010 I'd already been disillusioned with modern movies for a while and wasn't habitually watching TV anymore. I watched all the Rocky movies a long while ago, and I noticed that Rocky Balboa had a kind of cold harshness to the look of the film that I found grating. That was in 2006 already.

 No.364842

>>364838
Yes i was born in 93 and even i noticed that style as a kid. Everything became cold, gritty, and clinical. I wonder if nolan was responsible for that

 No.364843

>>364823
Boogie Nights is the only movie in months that I decided to stop watching about 1/3 of the way through.

 No.364848

File: 1759914544899.jpg (85.86 KB, 640x694, 320:347, i-love-the-7th-gen-but-col….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>364838
>>364842
Maybe it's the post 9/11 effect. Things got gritty and 'realistic'. 7th gen gaming particularly exhibited this.

 No.364850

>>364848
I loved the piss filter tbh.

 No.364851

>>364850
It was fine for some games but generally seeing it everywhere made it all look bland and sterile.

 No.364856

File: 1759930077380-0.jpg (190.18 KB, 500x354, 250:177, 5660900792_0a9b4386b0.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1759930077380-1.jpg (109.68 KB, 600x338, 300:169, db481c285d344bf3-600x338.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1759930077380-2.jpg (72.74 KB, 500x500, 1:1, posters.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>364850
It was absolute trash
Removing them from the games makes them look 2 times better.

>>364842
The Matrix was actually, it's color grading became a trend in the late 2000s and everything became teal and orange because Hollywood needs to nickel and dime everything, including good lighting.

>>364838
What I really liked about early 2000s movies was the melancholic and surreal atmosphere which is completely lacking from late 2000s shit with very few exceptions.

Transformers turned everything into a shitty cardboard blockbuster and capeshit right after it just cemented those kinds of shitty movies.
Physical media dying out just killed any kind of small/medium sized production at that point as well.

 No.364857

>>364856
Fuck yourself and die, faggot.

 No.364862

>>364856
>everything became teal and orange
wow you're right

 No.364864

>>364857
I think I'll kill you and fuck your corpse instead.

 No.364870

>>364857
>le sage is a downvote

hello newfriend

 No.364906

>>364639
Nuzach, stop being a butthurt sagefag.

 No.365076

File: 1760334367339.png (18.21 KB, 185x280, 37:56, Screenshot 2025-10-13 at 0….png) ImgOps iqdb

>The budget, initially greenlighted at $115 million, ballooned to as much as $175 million, the most expensive of Anderson's career.

SLOP AND FLOP

 No.365083

>>364682
He always makes this cuckface

 No.365087

>>365083
It's almost like he's the cuck king or something

 No.365111

>>365076
Despite that, it's still his highest grossing movie ever. Not good enough I suppose. Why the hell did the budget go from $115mil to $175mil anyway?

 No.365112

File: 1760442119466.jpeg (25.79 KB, 608x504, 76:63, pwsa.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

>>364638
>Paul Thomas Anderson
I confuse the name with Paul W.S. Anderson

 No.365114

>>365111
They ended up giving him a blank check because in the end it's more about spreading cultural Marxism than turning a profit.

 No.365115

>>365114
Good.
Movies are over. No one goes anymore. People want slop, and they want slop on demand directly to their living room.

 No.365116

>>365115
>Movies are over. No one goes anymore.
No one wants to pay movie theater concession prices with the added bonus of worrying about getting shot where you sit.

 No.365117

>>365112
W.s just wants to entertain and impregnate his wife.
He would never make such slop.

 No.365121

File: 1760460143851.jpeg (59.26 KB, 625x420, 125:84, armond chilling.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

>>365112
Battle of the Andersons

Resident Evil has fun with 3D, The Master makes fun of religion

by Armond White

Compare the unoriginal use of 3D in Hugo-standard diorama compositions with objects poking out toward the viewer-to Paul W.S. Anderson's astonishingly lively 3D compositions in Resident Evil: Retribution where heroine Alice (Milla Jovovich) fights the Umbrella Corporation's viral experiments that produced a plague turning mankind into zombies. Anderson's images vivify the entire expanse of the wide screen to keep your eyes busy surveying the breadth of action while also pulling your vision inward for an appreciation of depth-and emotion.

My point isn't to measure Paul W. S. Anderson against Martin Scorsese; that's too easy-an almost unfair contrast of innovative imagination to uninspired convention. Adventurous Alice embodies modern anxieties (Anderson's stimulus) as opposed to geeky Hugo who drags us back to the irrelevancies of tired cinephilia (Scorsese's desperate recourse). It's time now to assert Paul W.S. Anderson's status as one of contemporary cinema's most thrilling talents. He deserves a clarifying comparison to the fraudulent, annoyingly monickered Paul Thomas Anderson whose film The Master opened the same week as Resident Evil 5.

It's inevitable that Paul Thomas Anderson's artistic ambitions should be unavoidably juxtaposed to Paul W.S, Anderson's artistic success. Their differences immediately reveal how a pseudo-serious indie artiste fails the aesthetic and emotional impact of commercial craftsmanship. The Master, a roman a clef about Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard and his paradigmatic follower, is a dull, nihilistic and mean-spirited presumption of cultural history whereas the futuristic fantasy of Resident Evil: Retribution turns nihilism into Apocalyptic Pop. This is the classic White elephant vs. Termite art parallel once coined by critic Manny Farber.

Memorably dubbed "P.T." (as in the huckster-showman P.T. Barnum) by New York Press' Godfrey Cheshire, Paul Thomas Anderson makes "big" movies that resemble the 1960s studio epics today's film geeks never experienced-and so become fools for the highly-hyped affectations of a brand-name charlatan. The Master's opening sequence-an extended pantomime of a WWII sailor's shameless perversities-presents Freddie Quell's (Joaquin Pheonix) sexual exhibitionism as if defining his character. Its blatancy is similar to the puritanical bluntless about the porn industry in P.T.'s Boogie Nights. Quell symbolizes the neuroses prone to authoritarian exploitation. Essentially a coming-of-age story, The Master's bad father figure is cult leader Lancaster Dodd, played by Philip Seymour Hoffman doing the same psychotic mastermind as in Charlie Kaufman's unbearable Synecdoche, N.Y. There's a similarity to P.T. and Kaufman's egotistic conceits. They trade on "smartness" and both directors are incapable of providing an enlightening, entertaining vision.

Resident Evil: Retribution doesn't sell "big ideas" or "controversy." It continues the video-game-based series that Paul W.S. Anderson has assayed three previous times, always growing. Anderson's taste for the kinetic excitement that gaming has in common with cinema inspires him to turn gaming conventions into idealized pop myths. Serious ideas about our entropic destiny are used to confirm humanity's positive will as embodied by resilient Alice (athletic, emotive Milla fulfills the warrior promise of Sigourney Weaver's Ripley and shows a convincing maternal gentleness in a terrifying domestic tangent). This universal lesson opposes The Master's cynicism in which P.T.'s vague storytelling alludes to notorious religious beliefs then particularizes its "expose" with pessimistic displays of Quell and Dodd's actorly neuroses. It's a secularist epic for audiences of the vampire age who don't believe in religion anyway-there's no possibility of rebirth or conversion, just suspicions of torture as Dodd manipulates Quell to follow orders and reveal his pain. Yet Alice (in a Wasteland rather than Wonderland) meets cynicism head on and does spectacular battle with it. That used to be the purpose of movies-at least until the indie era permitted disaffected filmmakers to obfuscate moral predicaments with narcissistic indulgence.

Resident Evil: Retribution reworks popular notions of dystopia. While P.T. means to impress critics, Paul W.S. Anderson has fun with 3D and has greater impact. His opening and closing sequences are unforgettable. In the first, Alice's tragic memory plays in reverse: disaster is shown (equal to the opening of Peckinpah's The Wild Bunch) then remedied with a visionary optimism like Michael Jackson's Earth Song music video. In the last tableau, her beyond-belief premonition creates a Heironymous Bosch cliffhanger. And throughout the film, Paul W.S. Anderson goes through the structures and levels of game-playing the way epic poets and novelists went through varied events to describe the full tenacity of human experience. Set in the Testing Floor of a Soviet war experiment with soundstage Times and Red Squares, then with a very modern vision of the White House, Resident Evil teases the idea of both movie and gaming fantasy. It puts the modern urge to survive (Faith) in witty context.

If you're indifferent to Scientology, The Master will seem much ado about hoodoo. Given his trendy aversion to the subject of Faith, P.T. replays his antipathy toward religion same as in There Will Be Blood. He reduces reprobate Quell and charlatan Dodds to Method acting showing-off. Phoenix's humpback and hare-lipped snarl/smirk recall a DeNiro yokel and Hoffman's posturing again exposes his script's grandstanding. The only subtlety is P.T.'s in-joke reference to Burt Lancaster in Elmer Gantry, Richard Brooks 1960 film version of Sinclair Lewis' 1927 novel exploring religious hucksterism. This confirms that P.T. doesn't just imitate his previous models Altman, Kubrick, Lynch and King Vidor; he's also inferior to Brooks. There will be copycatting!

All that ballyhoo about The Master being shot in 70mm means nothing in the digital cinema age (too many oppressive home-video close-ups waste technology specifically designed to give tactility to what might be lost in distant scope). Praising this shows ignorance about cinematography. Instead, the smart-about-movies crowd should be looking at Paul W.S. Anderson's aesthetics. A photo album sequence compositing shots from the previous Resident Evils activates the screen's fields, planes, and composition quadrants. The story may be a relay of obstacles and levels that test Alice's intelligence and perseverance ("As I became more powerful, the human race became weaker" she worries) but the film stays lively, the action-narrative relentless. Note: The best visual P.T. can muster is an over-obvious jail-cell scene that puts id and super-ego side-by-side.

Compare that redundant ambiguity to the sequence where Alice confronts her manipulation by the Umbrella Corporation in a factory. The image of her robotic replication surely recalls Spielberg's A.I. (a summary reference for the Resident Evil series) but it also painfully signifies her political disillusionment-not only that, it inspires her determination to fight on.

The Master's cynical bombast defines the worst aspects of our anti-religious era; its solemn audacity is unconvincing (a fashion show scored to Ella Fitzgerald and a naked females musical number recalling Eyes Wide Shut are two of the most embarrassingly banal sequences in recent cinema). The fun and fascination of Paul W. S. Anderson's Resident Evil: Retribution proves the work of a true cinema artist; it transforms a genre franchise with visionary newness.

 No.365122

>>365111
It's amazing people like that still keep making shit even though nothing they do makes much money.

 No.365132

>>365121
Lmaoooo is this an april fools review or something? This is some next level cobtrarianism lol

 No.365133

>>365132
Armond Gaped your shit opinions.



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]