[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]

/tv/ - Movies and Television

no girls allowed
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1759808966980.png (353.94 KB, 640x480, 4:3, ClipboardImage.png) ImgOps iqdb

 No.364808

Legendary Hollywood director Ridley Scott says that the film industry is so bad that he is being relegated to just re-watching his own old films.

The famed Blade Runner director is very pessimistic about the film industry, calling most of what Hollywood is putting out is little else but "mediocrity," Deadline reported.

"The quantity of movies that are made today, literally globally - millions. Not thousands, millions… and most of it is shit," he said during an interview at BFI Southbank in London on Sunday. Scott also said many films are "saved" by the superior digital effects available to filmmakers now. But that is true because they don't have "great thing on paper first."

When asked what modern films he likes, he replied, "Well, actually, right now, I'm finding mediocrity - we're drowning in mediocrity. And so what I do - it's a horrible thing - but I've started watching my own movies, and actually they're pretty good! And also, they don't age."

Scott, 87, went on to say that films are so bad, he is now going back and watching his own catalog.

"I watched Black Hawk [Down] the other night and I thought, 'How in the hell did I manage to do that?' But I think occasionally a good one will happen, [and] it's like a relief that there's somebody out there who's doing a good movie," he exclaimed.

Scott also hinted about what plans he has for Gladiator 3.

"He's around and he technically is the Emperor of Rome, and so I have a footprint about what I think it should be," he said of the film's hero.

While he is ready for another Gladiator, and he has signed on to multiple sequels for the Aliens series, he recently noted that he turned down a $20 million opportunity to helm Terminator 3 because he would "fuck it up" by trying to "make it real."

While many are hopeful that artificial intelligence could help save Hollywood, Scott is more worried about AI than he is excited by it.

Back in 2023, he warned that we need to "lock down AI" before it gets out of hand.

"If I'm designing AI, I'm going to design a computer whose first job is to design another computer that's cleverer than the first one," he explained. "And when they get together, then you're in trouble, because then it can take over the whole electrical-monetary system in the world and switch it off. That's your first disaster. It's a technical hydrogen bomb. Think about what that would mean."

"AI will get dangerous," he insisted.
https://www.breitbart.com/entertainment/2025/10/06/director-ridley-scott-says-most-movies-are-sht-hollywood-drowning-in-mediocrity/

 No.364811

And he's a part of that
When was his last decent flick
American Gangster?
20 fucking years ago?

 No.364812

>>364811
I liked Napoleon. I'm a sucker for epics, and they're not too common anymore, so I take what I can get.

 No.364813

>>364812
I heard it wae shit

 No.364816

File: 1759825783767.jpg (269.23 KB, 1000x1480, 25:37, MV5BMTc2MTQ3MDA1Nl5BMl5Ban….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

I initially read it as "Most of HIS Movies are shit" and I agreed but then I read it again. He sure loves the smell of his own farts.

>>364811
I never saw it but Martian (2015) got rave reviews but /tv/ told me it was shit and literally reddit the movie so idk. I think that's when the Ridley Scott's a hack consensus formed here.

 No.364821

>>364816
Is that Andrew Anglin in space?

 No.364824

Jesus Christ is this an Onion article?

 No.364830

>>364816
Prometheus is what did it for me what a jumbled mess.

 No.364834

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>364813
>wae
Does Ridley still speak with a Geordie accent, like?

 No.364835

>>364834
Lel, I was thinking he might have been writing in Scots or something when I first glanced at that post.

 No.364877

I still can't believe Hackley Scott cast Matt Damon as an astronaut in The Martian because he had just seen Matt Damon play an astronaut in Interstellar.

 No.364884

File: 1759975888778.jpeg (510.94 KB, 1280x1920, 2:3, armond teleports behind y….jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

Ridley Scott's Napoleon Complex

Hollywood's Ultra Hack returns to hackneyed European history.

By Armond White

Ridley Scott's Napoleon is another of his lavishly produced movie epics with a TV-commercial mindset. As usual, Scott sells visually sumptuous cynicism, this time about Napoleon Bonaparte leveraging his control of post-Revolution France, starting in 1793, to attempt conquering the world. But Scott and screenwriter David Scarpa (All the Money in the World) display a tawdry sense of Western history that is unfortunately in sync with the times. It's a commercial selling despotism.

As Joaquin Phoenix portrays him, Napoleon is idiosyncratic, pervy, brutish - Joker in a bicorne hat. Phoenix's caricature reflects today's popular disdain for colonialist Europe, embodying our broken sense of heroism - now the result of living through deceitful leadership. Napoleon's bravado and military cunning are juxtaposed with personal quirks seen in his marital competition with Empress Josephine (Vanessa Kirby). Their lurid contest of wills is worthy of both TMZ and The Crown. Josephine hikes up her dress, spreads her legs, and taunts, "Once you see it, you will always want it." It's a metaphor for dictatorial obsession.

European History 101 highlights flash by: Marie Antoinette at the guillotine, the Reign of Terror, the siege at Toulon, the excursion into Egypt, the battle of Austerlitz, plus sub-Tolstoy War and Peace nuggets. Each incident is an art director's triumph rather than historical revelation. Scott himself is a commander of extravagant imagery that is often visually striking. Back when Blade Runner came out, some reviewers mistook its futuristic, sci-fi opulence for Josef von Sternberg's sensual expressiveness. But since then, Scott has plied his undeniable talent impersonally.

Scott is Ultra Hack because he reduces the moral complexity of his stories to the same easy consumption we get from a TV advert. But Napoleon is protracted, as if running time and rambling narrative incidents (the back-and-forth from battlefield to Josephine) amounted to substance. Napoleon parades an empty spectacle for a market uninterested in learning from history. And Ultra Hack's indifference encourages that disinterest. He stages Napoleon's legendary boast so that Phoenix lisps "I found the crown of France in the gutter and placed it atop my own head" to convey the same deadly egotism as the swaggering, drug-dealing protagonist of American Gangster. But then his battle of Austerlitz is an eyeful. In this large-scale set piece, the French army fires cannons at Russian soldiers on a field of ice, and the explosions plunge them into the water. Not a sustained feat of cinematic vision, as is Eisenstein's battle on the ice in Alexander Nevsky; it's just splashy.

Comparison to Eisenstein is a compliment, yet there really is no comparison. Scott's Napoleon represents a culture of visual frivolity, the depreciation of aesthetics that is a consequence of TV's overload and digital technology's unreality. (Too much fantastic video-game-style imagining.)

History means nothing when its facsimile can be summoned up by Hollywood's keyboard warriors. Not even Scott, an unemotional aesthete, can pretend that he cares about history. (Exodus: Gods and Kings was dazzling yet meaningless, and the Oscar-winning Gladiator was overrated for the beefcake-peplum genre.) Ultra Hack's brother, the late Tony Scott, was so committed to genre junk that he frequently achieved effective narratives (Unstoppable, Domino). But Ridley is less successful with his own phase of lurid melodramatic trash such as The Counselor, House of Gucci, All the Money in the World. These spectacles of bad behavior misrepresent our anxieties about power, immorality, and national destiny. Abel Gance visualized those concerns in his 1927 three-screen silent film Napoleon, a movie so magnificent that its vision makes grown men cry. Ridley Scott's Napoleon is just a Breaking Bad costume drama.

 No.364885

>>364884
>Ridley Scott's Napoleon is just a Breaking Bad costume drama.
/ournog/ strikes again raping the faggots like scott, its like the starwars kikes who praise filoni when he butchered star wars.

 No.364886

>>364884
>Ultra hack
kek

 No.364901

>>364884
Nuzach loves unironically a black porn star, but seethe about anons liking Armond White posting. Do you notice a pattern?

 No.364904

>>364901
He's just a house bitch. Lexington Steele won.

 No.364911

>>364904
Lex got gaped by diddy

 No.364912

>>364904
See, again being a faggot and contrarian, you would literally get pozzed by a black guy just to own the buckbreaking "nazis".

 No.364933

>>364912
Nuzach is a cuckold.

 No.364935

File: 1760067945293.webm (9.63 MB, 360x540, 2:3, ramon_green_lantern.webm) ImgOps iqdb

>>364901
Isn't it odd how he loves Lexington Steele but attacks a less black porn star as a "coon"?

 No.364937

>>364935
He's hugely into black dick. A lot of what he's doing is out of shame at his own unnatural urges.

 No.364939

File: 1760070779260.jpg (39.54 KB, 620x826, 310:413, Why-Cant-I-Hold-All-These-….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb


 No.364971

>>364939
>he's still capitalizing the s in sage for his epic sage downvotes

Why does he do this

 No.364991

File: 1760148052042.png (531.71 KB, 1280x980, 64:49, ZZZZxcvxvcxbf.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>364939
Nobody's seething but you, little buddy.

 No.365002

File: 1760166642059-0.jpg (287.97 KB, 487x758, 487:758, Racism killing Bix Nood th….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1760166642059-1.jpg (161.16 KB, 1080x1350, 4:5, OJ Simpson honored by Bix'….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1760166642059-2.jpg (58.88 KB, 763x1024, 763:1024, Bix Nood btfo JK Rowling's….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1760166642059-3.png (598.9 KB, 720x863, 720:863, Bix Nood biting the hand t….png) ImgOps iqdb

>>364824
Onion and the many other satire news sites should've thrown the towel aeons ago.

 No.365003

>>365002
>and behold i will make them of the synagogue of satan.

Where is the attack ?

 No.365039

>>365003
I think that verse is referring to gentile converts in Asia Minor anyway. Probably just self-hating goyim larping as Jews like Christians love doing today. It's not an attack on the Jews the way e-crusaders like to think it is.

 No.365091

>>365039
Oy vey…honestly we need a new crusade against what the online right has become. A proper European Crusade.



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]