>>369517>honestly I've found the white Nationalist 1.0s who oppose them pretty pathetic and in the same vein.The old-school guys could be pretty cringy, particularly the ones who would pal around with the KKK or skinhead types. I like Tom Metzger, but he could be pretty embarrassing too. Revilo P. Oliver seemed like a really smart guy, but from what I know he was an outlier didn't do the street activism thing that characterized others from that period. I like Jared Taylor, but he's not really what comes to mind when you think of the WN 1.0 guys.
The WN 2.0 era was when white nationalists started getting their act together by combining transgressive humor that made their opponents come across as stodgy and out of touch with a higher average level of intellectualism that wasn't emphasized by most of the older movement. So much of the old guys just seemed content with shouting about how much they hated niggers and kikes, which isn't going to win very many people over.
I would take the newer white nationalists over Spicolas, who not only completely fails on being consistently pro-white but is a total piece of shit as a person. Fuentes still generally has better takes than most of the big "alt media" personalities like Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, or Candace Owens, but that's not saying much. He would definitely be better as a pundit if he dropped the Jesus bullshit and stopped pushing for the U.S. to become a Catholic theocracy.
>The only ones I seem actually fit the bill of some level of basedness are Adam Green and Need more Amalek as well.Yeah, and Twitter is basically a cesspool of retardation outside of the anti-Abrahamic section that those guys belong to. Need More Amalek has really thin skin and chimps out pretty easily, but his knowledge of Christianity and Bible scholarship allows him to argue circles around his opponents. I disagree with Adam Green and Need More Amalek on some of the schizo stuff (pic related), but they're pretty correct in regard to its lack of political utility in regard to the Jewish issue and how it's being used to neuter Judeoskepticism. People fall for complete red herrings like the Khazar hypothesis and deicide accusations that still lead them to looking at the world through Jew-derived framing while tooting their own horn about how much they understand the Jewish Question. People who got "redpilled" after October 7th tend to not get the real issues at all. Now those same idiots are trying to push another Satanic panic because they don't want to accept that they share the same religious roots as Jeffrey Epstein's people.
The anti-Abrahamic stance needs to keep being pushed unrelentingly in the way criticism of Jews used to be back when the overwhelming majority of people had serious misgivings about it. Unless it's built on a pro-white foundation, criticism of Jews isn't very valuable. Otherwise you get dolts repeating leftist talking points about how Jews are a problem because Israel is a settler colonialist project, how the biggest issue is Zionism and not Judaism as a whole, or conservatard crap about it being a godless secular society (leaving out the fact that a truly secular state isn't going to invoke scriptures about God being a real-estate agent who granted their ancestors land thousands of years ago). The real problem is that Judaism and its offshoots are antiwhite superstitions and that Jews are conniving, entitled crybabies with an axe to grind against the "Roman" West.
>>369529I said I didn't like him but agree with some of his takes, dickhead. Also, Foxdick Farmers are smooth-brained Christfags.