/tv/ - Movies and Television

>>374147
Didn't even know he still had a platform.

He is a kike.

He's not a leftist and never has been. His entire schtick has been running cover for the Democrats while attacking actual leftists including journalists and third party candidates like Jill Stein. If what I just wrote sounds incomprehensible to you, that is due entirely to your lack of political education.

He doesn't care as long as he gets paid

>>374159
Democrats are leftists. They just aren't hard leftists in today's political climate.

>>374171
The furthest left the Democrats ever went was FDR, and he explicitly passed the New Deal because he wanted to save capitalism. Expand your political horizons Amerifat, the Overton Window in your country is laughably small.

>>374172
You have a pretty myopic take on what leftism means. It's not strictly about economic policy. That's only part of it. Today's Democrats are much further to the left on social issues than FDR ever was.

>>374173
You can always tell when you're talking to a Burgerlander because words (especially the political kind) mean essentially the opposite of their original meaning to them due to spending their lives immersed in the society that literally invented the study of propaganda.

'Left'? In Burgerland this is a synonym for Keynesian social democrats in love with identity politics.
'Liberal'? In Burgerland that means left, despite it being understood literally everywhere else in the world to mean the right-wing ideology that thinks capitalism is the best thing ever.
'Libertarian'? In Burgerland that means the most extreme advocate for corporate rule, despite it originally being coined to describe anarchists in France when the government banned explicit anarchists. Actual anarchists oppose capitalism by definition.
'Democracy'? In Burgerland that actually means the system of oligarchy pioneered by ancient Rome… which was actually diametrically opposed to contemporary democracies like Athens and Syracuse.

Just take a political word and imagine the opposite and you'll ironically have a more accurate understanding of politics in Burgerland.

>>374174
Great post.

>>374174
>'Left'? In Burgerland this is a synonym for Keynesian social democrats in love with identity politics.
Not true. The best definition of left vs. right in the modern day that I know of comes down to egalitarianism vs. hierarchy. Libertarians and Nazis are both considered rightists because they both highly emphasized different forms of hierarchy. For the libertarians it largely comes down to apologetics for economic stratification, and for the Nazis it was extreme national chauvinism.

Similarly, the left encompasses everything from bourgeois anti-white "queer ally" Democrats to radical anti-capitalists who hate their guts for being in bed with business interests and would gladly have them lined up against the wall come the revolution.

Also, "identity politics" is basically a redundant term. All politics is essentially "identity politics" because humans are social animals and are the product of broader cultural and biological forces. Unless you're some totally deracinated hyperindividualist, your identity will inevitably influence your politics. People making decisions based on their identity isn't an inherently bad thing.

>>374174
Not just Americans. I've seen this kind of retardation everywhere there are online discourses in English. It's the same thing as calling the Nazis "far right" - far right compared to whom and by what metric? If you ask this in an English-speaking community the majority of answers will be straight up bullshit.

>>374147
they've gone too far out on that limb. it's over.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=lr2K71gtZk4&ra=m