>>142406No, I'm not of poor reading comprehension.
I'm pointing out how yet again people can't read.
Involuntarily celibate in this context is accredited to men being placed in a form of bondage and placed regionally or structurally, separated from women, and thus, have no control over whether they can "have sex" or not because of the physical barriers between themselves and women.
"Incel," as you've clearly shown with your (((mainstream media))) article, was invented by kikes. If you really think "a heckin' woman invented it" and it was "heckin' stolen by toxic men," you fell for the kike psyop. "Incel" completely dismisses the possibility of a person choosing celibacy which is about the most egregious error in logic one can exercise given the knowledge of the word origins. To suggest that men are involuntarily celibate when they are in the vicinity of women is to show you have no understanding of what the word means. "Incel" was honed to elicit emotional reactions which clearly succeed. "Invcel" is too literal like "involuntarily celibate" suggests, and it's too foreign for English speaking internet spaces. It also doesn't roll off the tongue. These are clearly the results of wordsmithing. It is clearly used to sow division and enflame arguments, obviously a weapon of JIDF etc on the internet at large. Ultimately it expands on previous efforts to divide men and women by injecting psychological reasonings behind celibacy while obfuscating the actual reasons one might avoid promiscuous sex.
In a society where sex is used to bombard people 24/7 in all forms of media to distract them and erode them, the combination in assault would be to judge people that are not weakened by the first assaults.