[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]

/dup/ - btfo

Political Shitposting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)
  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]

File: 1724620255712.jpg (58.81 KB, 1272x938, 636:469, 1720161964253.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

 No.147343[View All]

Neonazis, larpagans and racists fuck off.

BBC and JEWS are welcome!

https://www.christianpost.com/news/davey-blackburn-forgives-wifes-alleged-killers-just-like-jesus-bible-luke-23.html
687 posts and 419 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.167991

>>167988
Instead of tying your mind into a pretzel we wuzzin' n shit over commie kike on a stick, why don't you come up with practical ways to teach the 88 Precepts to the youth, or some kind of on the ground activist things we can do to advance our message

 No.168006

File: 1772100070336-0.jpg (1.3 MB, 1920x1168, 120:73, media_G7boNJnXcAACkkb.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1772100070336-1.jpg (315.13 KB, 2048x1674, 1024:837, media_HBkvmgZbUAMMWlc.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>167988
>jesus christ our lord and savior is white
No, he was a brown, Middle-Eastern Jew assuming he actually existed.
>the kikes of today are not white
On a genetic level they genuinely have more European ancestry than Rabbi Yeshua would have had.

Stop it with the fake countersemitism. Spouting this schizo nonsense is doing nothing but holding us back. Your e-crusader friends criticize Jews for supposedly not being Jewish and seriously think they're fighting Jewish power by doing so. There are genuine reasons to oppose the Jews that aren't crackpot idiocy like that or crying about Jews supposedly killing Jewsus which was supposedly part of Yahweh's plan according to your own religion and today's Jews they couldn't have the slightest responsibility for if they're not descended from the Jews of the Bible. You're not scoring a goal against the Jews by affirming their made-up scriptures and their idea that they're a special people of divinely mandated significance that gentiles lack. Romans is clear that the Jews haven't lost favor with Yahweh and that the goyim are just pawns in his cosmic game.

 No.168089

File: 1772334506338.jpg (144.11 KB, 744x864, 31:36, bjXeifZ.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb


 No.168090

>>168089
Of course christcucks are fake

 No.168349

File: 1772836368713.webm (6.93 MB, 640x360, 16:9, 28468be2d659831bb0e62f39a….webm) ImgOps iqdb

Grok, explain.

 No.168396

File: 1772852705452.mp4 (5.68 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, penispenispenis.mp4) ImgOps iqdb

>>168349
The problem with Jews is just that they haven't accepted Yeshua Hamashiach into their hearts.

 No.168542

File: 1773240795743.mp4 (540.82 KB, 576x318, 96:53, Y8HghyL-Iih1SHuY.mp4) ImgOps iqdb

OH NONONONONONO, SATANISTBROS, NOT LIKE THIS!

 No.168544

File: 1773243112880.mp4 (5.25 MB, 1280x630, 128:63, xO1N-b9HRpsYlI7E.mp4) ImgOps iqdb

CHRISTCUCKS BTFO!

 No.168545

>>168544
Which country is this?

 No.168576

>>168544
Seems like the kind of person Rabbi Yeshua would hang out with.

 No.168583

>>168545
My guess is south korea.

 No.168737

File: 1773622223975.png (203.71 KB, 498x481, 498:481, media_HDd3atvWwAAGAUl.png) ImgOps iqdb

Grok, is this true?

 No.168740

File: 1773624067108.jpg (120.65 KB, 716x979, 716:979, media_G15KSOfXMAEy6dt.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168737
>Khazars are not Semites.
If Ashkenazis are Khazars, that means they can't be blamed for killing Rabbi Yeshua.

 No.168743

>>168740
>A religion made up by God is actually Jewish
Cringe.

 No.168744

File: 1773631144094-0.jpg (79.47 KB, 1170x958, 585:479, media_G3oyftUWsAEqf9l.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773631144094-1.png (98.99 KB, 967x1479, 967:1479, media_Gi-3eY_XUAABqCS.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1773631144094-2.jpg (59.41 KB, 934x522, 467:261, media_GyrgbNwWEAMPQBU.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773631144094-3.png (241.4 KB, 758x1236, 379:618, psalm-2.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>168743
It was made up alright, but not by God. It's Jewish through and through. What does "INRI" stand for again?

 No.168749

>>168740
Correct. Ashkenazis are not the people who killed Jesus. They emulate them but are not of their bloodline.

>>168744
>2nd image
>4th point
literally pants on head retarded point.

 No.168750

File: 1773642086456-0.jpg (131.82 KB, 631x902, 631:902, Guum3zHXkAA4zOS.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773642086456-1.jpg (102.72 KB, 911x1280, 911:1280, GxXEv_0XEAAn0DM.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773642086456-2.jpg (71.47 KB, 1290x717, 430:239, media_G0M8pkfXkAAxW25.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773642086456-3.jpg (529.49 KB, 1642x2048, 821:1024, media_G7VWm9NX0AABN3Y.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168749
>Ashkenazis are not the people who killed Jesus. They emulate them but are not of their bloodline.
Then why do fake "noticers" call them Christ killers?
>literally pants on head retarded point.
Are you too dense to realize the implications of what it's saying? Hint: "Nations" means "goyim."

 No.168780

>>168744
Bravo, kike, bravo. Now it's my turn to quote some scriptures:

1 Thessalonians 2:15 and 16: [The Jews] killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:
16. Forbidding us to speak to the Gentiles that they might be saved, to fill up their sins alway: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost.

Judges 3:7 and 8: And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of [God], and forgat [God], and served Baalim and the groves. 8. Therefore the anger of [God] was hot against Israel, and he sold them into the hand of Chushan-rishathaim king of Mesopotamia…

Judges 4:1 and 2: And the children of Israel again did evil in the sight of [God], when Ehud was dead. 2. And [God] sold them into the hand of Jabin king of Canaan…

Judges 10:6 and 7: And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of [God], and served Baalim, and Ashtaroth, and the gods of Syria, and the gods of Zidon, and the gods of Moab, and the gods of the children of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines, and forsook [God], and served not him. 7. And the anger of [God] was hot against Israel, and he sold them into the hands of the Philistines, and into the hands of the children of Ammon.

 No.168791

File: 1773702948641.jpg (211.48 KB, 1140x838, 570:419, media_Gkil3XBWUAAL2na.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168780
So Jews are bad because they're not following Yahweh in the correct manner? How is criticizing Jews for not being Jewish in the right way doing anything to fight Jewish power?

 No.168793

168791
>criticizing Jews for not being Jewish
This is not what my post meant and you know it, so why try and publish bait in response? Do you really have no counter to the scriptures' negative portrayal of the Jews?

 No.168802

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>168793
Except that's exactly what your post is implying. Those verses only show Jews in a negative light in that their behavior in those instances is supposed to be displeasing to Yahweh.

It's not particular branches of Abrahamism that are the problem. It's the whole Jewish tree. Even "based Christians" who reject the idea that Jews are still part of a divine covenant (a view explicitly rejected by the Epistle to the Romans) still think that Yahweh had chosen the Jews at one point in time. There's no real reason to believe the Jews have been selected to represent the creator of the universe, have magical prophecy powers that gentiles don't have access to, or that Jews deserve to rule over "the nations" because of the righteousness of their religious traditions. The Bible is based on falsified history and ancient legends with no substantial supporting evidence to begin with, so why believe in obvious lies? The whole thing is just anti-gentile superstition.

 No.168809

>>168750
Because they call themselves jews. So people treat them like jews. If I call myself irish, do you think it's odd if people assume I'm a drunk?

The 4th point does not contain the word "nations"

 No.168811

File: 1773715002156-0.png (184.4 KB, 1086x1596, 181:266, psalm_110_rsv.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1773715002156-1.png (173.97 KB, 1292x1558, 34:41, psalm_110_niv.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>168809
>Because they call themselves jews. So people treat them like jews.
They call themselves Jews because they are Jews. They have genetic and cultural continuity with the Jews of ancient times. They just have a significant amount of European DNA mixed in, which is an improvement, but they're still descendants of a rotten Middle-Eastern culture that they continue to uphold to this day.
>The 4th point does not contain the word "nations"
You're right about the wording in that particular translation, but other translations have it. I wasn't remembering the wording in that image right, but it's the same thing either way.

You can view it translated alongside the Hebrew here:
https://biblehub.com/interlinear/psalms/110.htm

 No.168837

>>168802
>their behavior in those instances
The scriptures deprecate the Jews in just about every single book. I can count the number of books where the Jews do not anger God on one hand.

>why believe in obvious lies?
It is a lie that the Jews turned their backs on God and have a long history of causing trouble for non-Jews? You expect anyone here to buy that, anon?

 No.168843

File: 1773797336440-0.jpg (565.39 KB, 2253x4096, 2253:4096, media_GikJWrvWEAA-4YU.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773797336440-1.jpg (610.67 KB, 2064x1920, 43:40, GrjQXPuXcAAC1bm.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773797336440-2.jpg (285.54 KB, 1600x1600, 1:1, Gx1T-ppbQAAVK9L.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773797336440-3.png (113.23 KB, 1348x826, 674:413, Isaiah 61:5-7.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>168837
>The scriptures deprecate the Jews in just about every single book. I can count the number of books where the Jews do not anger God on one hand.
They attack their fellow Jews for not being devout enough and dedicated to their twisted anti-gentile religion.
>It is a lie that the Jews turned their backs on God
They never had a special relationship with the creator of the universe to begin with. That's just self-serving nonsense on their part.
>and have a long history of causing trouble for non-Jews?
You don't have to believe in dozen of books written by Jews about how special their religion is to accept that. It's more the inverse. The ideas set down in the Old Testament are the foundation for the Jewish culture that have made the Jews such implacable enemies of gentiles right from the start.

 No.168844

File: 1773797552532.jpg (163.99 KB, 1054x1280, 527:640, most israelis are allergic….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168811
>They call themselves Jews because they are Jews. They have genetic and cultural continuity with the Jews of ancient times.
LOL, whatever you say Chaim. You're not fooling anyone.

Your second point is still irrelevent given the entire point of the bible. But I wouldn't expect a kike to understand that.

 No.168845

File: 1773798211491.jpg (133.2 KB, 1134x1070, 567:535, media_GzIDeYcWAAAe5QT.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168844
>LOL, whatever you say Chaim. You're not fooling anyone.
You're clearly not the familiar with Ashkenazi genetics. They're a mixture of ancient Middle-Eastern Jews mixed and ancient European populations. They're not as genetically close to ancient Jews as modern Levantines are, but they're obviously not Khazars or whatever brand of retardation you're promoting.

>Your second point is still irrelevent given the entire point of the bible. But I wouldn't expect a kike to understand that.
The entire point of the Bible is for Jews to serve Yahweh and dominate gentiles.

 No.168846

File: 1773799707038.jpg (48.77 KB, 533x523, 533:523, It's so hard being a jew s….jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168737
<GROOOOOOOOOOK, THEY KEEP CALLING ME AN N*ZI

 No.168851

>>168843
>They attack their fellow Jews for not being devout enough
Literally for burning babies alive and hosting gay orgies but hey, why would a lying kike admit to that?

>They never had a special relationship with the creator
So you're mad that you can't look down on non-Jews and are trying the sour grapes approach. Got it.

>The ideas set down in the Old Testament are the foundation for the Jewish culture that have made the Jews such implacable enemies of gentiles right from the start.
"I have never read the scriptures" would have been less work for you to type. The Old Testament is about how the Jews do the wrong thing time and time again until God essentially gives up on them, and the New Testament doubles down on this. Your cheap memes do not change this fact, rabbi.

 No.168853

File: 1773809146832-0.png (164.93 KB, 1580x808, 395:202, Romans 3:1-8.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1773809146832-1.png (222.95 KB, 1572x1312, 393:328, Romans 11:1-10.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1773809146832-2.png (300.12 KB, 1572x1240, 393:310, Romans 11:11-24.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1773809146832-3.png (233.28 KB, 1566x1254, 261:209, Romans 11:25-36.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1773809146832-4.png (238.24 KB, 1574x954, 787:477, Romans 15:22-32.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>168851
>Literally for burning babies alive and hosting gay orgies but hey, why would a lying kike admit to that?
No, serving other gods is enough for them to look down on them. What's the first commandment again?
>So you're mad that Jews and spiritual Jews (Christians) look down on non-Jews because of stories ancient Jews made up.
Fixed.
>The Old Testament is about how the Jews do the wrong thing time and time again until God essentially gives up on them,
At what point does Yahweh say he gives up on them? If the Jewish scriptures actually said that, why were Jews awaiting a messiah sent by Yahweh? That messianic expectation is what Christianity was built off. Christianity then began opening up its particular branch of Judaism up to gentile converts, who have been considered to be grafted on to the Jewish olive tree.
>and the New Testament doubles down on this.
Confirmed for never having read Romans.

 No.168868

>>168853
The very scriptures you quote say that God cut them off. It even says that there is a remnant in Romans 11:5, meaning that everyone else is still in trouble. For Israel, or Jews in general, to be saved would mean following Christ. When is the last time you met a Jew who follows Christ? And let's not forget what happened to the Jews after they killed Jesus. It is quite obvious that you are Googling what to say next without actually understanding what the scriptures mean, so I suggest you stop to avoid further shame.

For example, here is some context for Romans 3 from Romans 2:28 and 29: For he is not a Jew, which is one outwardly, neither is that circumcision, which is outward in the flesh: 29. But he is a Jew, which is one inwardly; and circumcision is that of the heart, in the spirit, and not in the letter; whose praise is not of men, but of God.

And of course, no talking lampshade is worth his yarmulke if he doesn't cite Romans 15. Notice how the people who do this are always very quiet about how the Jews who were blessed were Christians? The obvious message is that we believers should look out for one another, not that Christians owe Jews all their money and possessions.

 No.168869

>>168845
>You're clearly not the familiar with the jewish owned and funded pseudoscience.
Yes, because I'm not retarded enough to take that shit at face value.

>Confuses Israelites with jews.
Well done. Classic jewish lie. I bet you think Abraham was jewish as well. Embarrassing.

 No.168884

File: 1773890546659-0.png (155.03 KB, 680x359, 680:359, media_GgGGwsLWYAAwiXA.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1773890546659-1.jpg (979.59 KB, 2098x2451, 2098:2451, media_Gkp8ebTXEAABo-4.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1773890546659-2.jpg (137.88 KB, 972x1280, 243:320, GpPRkFnWwAE0D-_.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168868
>The very scriptures you quote say that God cut them off.
<I ask, then, has God rejected his people? By no means! I myself am an Israelite, a descendant of Abraham, a member of the tribe of Benjamin. God has not rejected his people whom he foreknew.
> It even says that there is a remnant in Romans 11:5, meaning that everyone else is still in trouble
<So I ask, have they stumbled so as to fall? By no means! But through their trespass salvation has come to the Gentiles, so as to make Israel jealous. Now if their trespass means riches for the world, and if their failure means riches for the Gentiles, how much more will their full inclusion mean!
<As regards the gospel they are enemies of God, for your sake; but as regards election they are beloved for the sake of their forefathers. For the gifts and the call of God are irrevocable. Just as you were once disobedient to God but now have received mercy because of their disobedience, so they have now been disobedient in order that by the mercy shown to you they also may receive mercy. For God has consigned all men to disobedience, that he may have mercy upon all.
They say nothing about being cut off. You're just making things up like a typical Jew-worshiping e-crusader. The Jews who didn't accept Rabbi Yeshua Hamashiach are guilty, but they haven't lost their chosen status. Their infidelity to Yahweh is also only a temporary matter.
>It is quite obvious that you are Googling what to say next without actually understanding what the scriptures mean, so I suggest you stop to avoid further shame.
No, Romans came to my mind immediately when I read your post because it so blatantly contradicts your attempt to harmonize your spiritual Semitism with opposition to Jewry. There's a reason you would you be kicked out of just about any church for writing the things you do here. Christianity is inherently Judaic.
>For example, here is some context for Romans 3 from Romans 2:28 and 29
How about posting the full passage?
<Circumcision indeed is of value if you obey the law; but if you break the law, your circumcision becomes uncircumcision. So, if a man who is uncircumcised keeps the precepts of the law, will not his uncircumcision be regarded as circumcision? Then those who are physically uncircumcised but keep the law will condemn you who have the written code and circumcision but break the law. For he is not a real Jew who is one outwardly, nor is true circumcision something external and physical. He is a Jew who is one inwardly, and real circumcision is a matter of the heart, spiritual and not literal. His praise is not from men but from God.
This isn't even rejecting Jewish law. Why the hell should any self-respecting gentile give a dead moose's last shit about circumcising their heart penis?
>And of course, no talking lampshade is worth his yarmulke if he doesn't cite Romans 15. Notice how the people who do this are always very quiet about how the Jews who were blessed were Christians?
So Jews are fine and you're fine with giving them money for their "spiritual blessings" if they follow the right flavor of Judaism? At least you're admitting that you're fine with kikery provided Jews follow your preferred rabbi. All you're doing is digging yourself deeper.
>>168869
So genetic science is Jewish now? Typical anti-intellectual Christbrain mentality. You'd rather believe in made-up nonsense about Khazars than honestly face the full implications of the Jewish Question. Are you a creationist and a flat earther too?
>I bet you think Abraham was jewish as well. Embarrassing.
Abraham is a fictional character like the rest of the patriarchs.

 No.168939

>>168884
They rejected him. That's why they worship Lucifer.

 No.168940

>>168884
>>168884
>So genetic science is Jewish now?
What you're referencing isn't science. It's correlation studies based on what essentially becomes self reported survey results of geneology funded by political jewish organizations carrying out research by jewish owned organizations such as "23&me"

That entire field of pseudoscience is for normalnigger retards. Horoscope tier.

 No.168956

File: 1774059340095.jpg (81.98 KB, 912x1136, 57:71, media_HB40LqhWwAAHgi1.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>168939
They don't though. You're just making things up again. Also, the only "Lucifer" in the Bible is the king of Babylon being referred to with that word in older translations of Isaiah. You're just desperately trying to avoid the fact that Jews worship the same kike god as you.

 No.168960

>>168956
The bible isn't the only source.
You're just displaying your ignorance of these religions.

 No.168962

>>168960
Stop pretending to be retarded.

 No.169033

>>168884
>proven wrong
>simply repeat earlier points, only now they're pink
How does this help you?

>but they haven't lost their chosen status
As if we needed more evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about. The children of Israel were initially set aside by God because of faith and obedience, not because they were Jewish by blood. The excerpt you unsuccessfully quoted means that if Jews adhere to the new covenant, then they will escape eternal damnation. Does it not say in your own post that they became enemies of God?

>I would get kicked out of churches today
The problem being? There are churches that bless fag marriages yet call themselves Christian.

>This isn't even rejecting Jewish law
Do you need to be circumcised (that is, cut your penis) to receive salvation? Yes or no? I'll wait.

>So Jews are fine and you're fine with
No need to make stuff up, anon. Just admit you were wrong and move on. I'll even be nice and not call you a kike unless you refuse.

 No.169042

File: 1774405132974-0.jpg (49.05 KB, 850x400, 17:8, 1590254404234-1.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774405132974-1.jpg (232.1 KB, 1200x1200, 1:1, GpOf3_aWcAAn6a7.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774405132974-2.png (345.94 KB, 489x507, 163:169, media_HBA1mHAbsAMJBI0.png) ImgOps iqdb

File: 1774405132974-3.png (88.86 KB, 630x315, 2:1, Romans-15-12.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>169033
>How does this help you?
I figured I need to break it down and make it easier to understand since you're apparently completely illiterate.
>As if we needed more evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about. The children of Israel were initially set aside by God because of faith and obedience, not because they were Jewish by blood. The excerpt you unsuccessfully quoted means that if Jews adhere to the new covenant, then they will escape eternal damnation. Does it not say in your own post that they became enemies of God?
Maybe posting the passage from the Contemporary English Version will put it in a way that you can understand:
<The people of Israel are treated as God's enemies, so the good news can come to you Gentiles. But they are still the chosen ones, and God loves them because of their famous ancestors. God doesn't take back the gifts he has given or disown the people he has chosen.
It says outright that they're still the chosen people despite their actions.
>Do you need to be circumcised (that is, cut your penis) to receive salvation? Yes or no? I'll wait.
Is Paul rejecting circumcision? Yes or no? I'll wait. And if circumcision was considered of no value whatsoever, why did Eusebius say that the first 15 bishops of the Jerusalem church were all circumcised Jews?
>The problem being? There are churches that bless fag marriages yet call themselves Christian.
There's a reason that "antisemitic" Christians are an irrelevant minority, and that's because it's not a tenable position. The Semitism is baked into the cake. You're trying to select the parts of the Bible you like a la carte and leave out the rest so you can pretend that Christianity provides any meaningful opposition to Jewish power. You can't fight international Jewry while literally worshiping a Jew who was supposedly prophesied to rule over the nations.

 No.169082

>>169033
He argues like a jew straight out of mein kampf.
Just ignore him.
He refuses to answer any direct questions, the best you can hope for is him replying to a question with another question or non sequitur.
He's terminally retarded and for all his typing hasn't successfully made a single point or won a single argument.

 No.169085

>>169082
I'll give the creature one last reply. This is probably the most anyone pays attention to him.

>>169042
>Contemporary English Version
ROFL

>Is Paul rejecting…
I asked you a 'yes or no' question. Why the hell am I seeing all this other stuff about Paul?

>The Semitism is baked into the cake
I don't have to observe the sabbath, kill goats and sheep when I sin, dodge bacon or cut my penis to be a Christian. Nice try.

>You can't fight international Jewry while literally worshipping a Jew
Abraham was the first Jew. If Jesus existed before Abraham, how can this be? What alternate form did he take on in Mark 16, then? Are you trying to imply that Jesus is stuck as a Jew forever? Instead of spending your Friday evening alone tomorrow, you should go do stand-up comedy instead. I promise you'll be a big hit!

 No.169093

File: 1774583445744-0.jpg (242.46 KB, 1116x1427, 1116:1427, media_GkaP6uPX0AA2cNE.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774583445744-1.jpg (119.66 KB, 1170x994, 585:497, GrSuxxrXIAAqd_i.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774583445744-2.jpg (103.18 KB, 1170x317, 1170:317, GrSuxxuXgAAGgFC.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774583445744-3.jpg (155.46 KB, 791x1024, 791:1024, Gvp0x3TWAAApuVR.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774583445744-4.jpg (252.53 KB, 1091x876, 1091:876, 1751430775723.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>169082
>He argues like a jew straight out of mein kampf.
Yeah, about that…

You're a moron if you think posting what the Jew scriptures plainly say and pointing out why that's a problem is arguing like a Jew. All you can do is seethe and ignore the points being made.
>>169085
>ROFL
You clearly lack reading comprehension, so I thought I needed to post something dumbed down for you. Any way you slice it, Romans is clear that Yahweh hasn't given up on the Jews.
>Why the hell am I seeing all this other stuff about Paul?
Because Paul's views are the topic at hand. You don't have Christianity as we know it without him.
>I don't have to observe the sabbath, kill goats and sheep when I sin, dodge bacon or cut my penis to be a Christian. Nice try.
And all Noahides have to do is follow the Seven Laws of Noah. What's the problem with that, goy? Would you seriously claim that that Noahides aren't a bunch of shabbos goyim? Christians still affirm the Tanakh, that Jews had been chosen by the creator of the universe, that they were privy to spiritual knowledge those dumb goyim didn't have, and that their messiah deserves to rule over the gentiles. These Old Testament ideas continued to be promoted by the New Testament.
>Abraham was the first Jew. If Jesus existed before Abraham, how can this be?
It was a gradual development. The writers of the Old Testament weren't Christians and didn't anticipate the Jesus character. As far as I know, the idea of Jesus being a preexistent being who incarnated as a Jew wasn't clearly established until the Gospel of John. Mark is arguably adoptionistic, Matthew and Luke add the virgin birth, and John equates Rabbi Yeshua with a preexistent Logos. Later on you had the slapfighting between Christians over the exact nature of the divinity of Jesus in relation to his human side. But whether you're talking about the dyophisitist Christologies of most Christians or the miaphysitism of the Oriental Orthodox Church, just about all Christian sects have considered the humanity of Jewsus to be essential to his nature and reject monophysites as filthy heretics. Christianity is Jew worship, and there's no way around that.

It's also pretty safe to say that the patriarchs were fictional characters invented well after they were supposed to have lived.
>Are you trying to imply that Jesus is stuck as a Jew forever?
If he ever existed historically, then yes. He would almost certainly have been just some kike who was immortalized after his death. We don't even know that much considering the lack of historical sources and how much of his story is clearly just midrash based on reinterpretations of Old Testament passages.

 No.169111

File: 1774624039428.png (256.36 KB, 640x538, 320:269, argument.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>169093
>You're a moron if
Good thing everything after "if" was an irrelevant non sequitur or I'd be the moron here!

>>169085
It appears the creature still didn't answer your direct question. Very typical. He also glosses over any point anyone made and continues to make points that are founded in direct opposition to points previously made as if it never happened.
He clearly isn't arguing in good faith.
But faith and jews don't mix.

 No.169113

This is the most virgin thread ever.

 No.169121

>>169113
You aren't exactly helping.

 No.169122

File: 1774665348730-0.jpg (94.77 KB, 885x797, 885:797, Gu5FNaFX0AAyw85.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774665348730-1.jpg (169.28 KB, 1172x642, 586:321, GukJ3tPWUAAvxCu.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774665348730-2.jpg (236.46 KB, 1064x1645, 152:235, GwJ6D3_WYAEnFIN.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774665348730-3.jpg (100.01 KB, 758x654, 379:327, media_G1U5IPsXoAAbn-Z.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774665348730-4.jpg (676.68 KB, 2048x2048, 1:1, media_HEYyA2IWAAAvJRy.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>169111
>was an irrelevant non sequitur or I'd be the moron here!
How is it a non sequitur when that's exactly what you're doing? It's no surprise that Christians are spiritual Jews when they argue so much like them. I'm point out that your religion is kiked to the core using its foundational texts, and you're getting assblasted and calling me Jewish. I'm not the one who worships the King of the Jews here. All you can do is get angry trying to rationalize being a submissive goytoy and bowing down before Rabbi Yeshua Hamashiach.

And why are you posting a quote from a guy whose political movement was anti-Christian?
>It appears the creature still didn't answer your direct question.
My stance is exactly what your Jew scriptures state:
Circumcision is considered by Paul to be a worthy endeavor for those upholding the law but not essential. Paul says in Romans that the law is no longer binding but that it still has had its place. In other words, he's not saying that Jewish law was stupid all along. He's promoting something that would bridge the gap between gentile "God-fearers" and Jews and help bring more goyim into the fold.
>He also glosses over any point anyone made and continues to make points that are founded in direct opposition to points previously made as if it never happened.
When and where did this happen?
>But faith and jews don't mix.
Sure, except faith in the same god you worship.

 No.169125

File: 1774682364662.jpg (10.15 KB, 216x225, 24:25, ClipboardImage-1771184785.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>169122
>How is it a non sequitur when I ignore all arguments and continually attack strawmen I created while defending jews from criticism.

 No.169129

File: 1774721211538.mp4 (7.51 MB, 720x1280, 9:16, NvaIlXMvTScylFTa.mp4) ImgOps iqdb

Jewish satanic elite bros, DOES THE GOYIM KNOW?!
Its kind of funny that all the pedo art doesn't include anime lolis

 No.169132

File: 1774742515535-0.jpg (637.82 KB, 2481x1734, 827:578, Gu0K7F4WQAABVI9.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774742515535-1.jpg (376.98 KB, 2280x1181, 2280:1181, Gu0KCQcWIAAHYEI.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774742515535-2.jpg (934.98 KB, 3414x2352, 569:392, Gx3WjiEXMAAVc7J.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774742515535-3.jpg (616.57 KB, 2243x2103, 2243:2103, Gx3WlaRWoAAfXmt.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

File: 1774742515535-4.jpg (78.51 KB, 500x597, 500:597, media_HEX9AtKacAAIVBf.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>169125
>How is it a non sequitur when I ignore all arguments and continually attack strawmen I created
Such as?
>while defending jews from criticism.
Yeah, I'm definitely defending Jews from criticism for pointing out that Christians are Jews' loyal henchmen and how any attempt to square Christianity with true opposition to Semitism can be expected to fall flat on its face.


[View All] (687 posts and 419 image replies omitted)
[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]