No.164067
>>164066Uh huh. We all believe you.
Nigger lover. No.164080
>>164068
This is not really how you beat the "nigger lover" accusation, friend.
No.164110
>>164107He's still a fag for his Jewsus shilling.
No.164113
>>164110Yeah I mean he's kind of a hypocrite for enforcing decorum after saying fuck, but he got blindsided when the kid called out his wealth, he should've been prepared to spin it in a positive way instead of denying it.
No.164401
>>164400Why is he making an idol out of skin color? We need to worship G-d and G-d only, like his Word says.
No.164407
>>164400They should make him the Pope.
No.164422
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
THIS IS HOW CONSERVATIVES WILL LOOK LIKE BY 2014
No.164424
>>164407I read he was in that chatroom to hit on minors, so he's got that part down at least.
No.164428
>>164424a natzi and a pedo? hope he becomes pope
No.164437
>>164422Dionysus was a god of fertility, not anal sex. Anal sex is infertile. Quit imposing fagism on the past.
No.164441
>>164440Imagine having that thing for a mother. Kids are already embarrassed of their parents as it is.
No.164442
>>164440>>164441she is very pretty naturally, very Aryan looking. Shame he got all those tattoos.
No.164450
>>164440This mattoid is a disgrace to Satan.
No.164454
Friendly reminder that Satan isn't real. Satan in the bible is a term, not a name or specific entity, and is used by various people who are getting in somebody else's way. The iconography of Satan, like so much of Christianity, is lifted off of Paganism.
No.164455
>>164443What makes you think her children aren't niglets?
No.164458
>>164455Not him, but most mudsharks are christcucks.
No.164460
>>164454>Satan in the bible is a term, not a name or specific entity, and is used by various people who are getting in somebody else's way.It does refer to a specific being in the New Testament.
>The iconography of Satan, like so much of Christianity, is lifted off of Paganism.Through the act of applying "pagan" iconography to their personification of evil, it becomes clear that in practice Satan is used to demonize gentile religious traditions.
>>164459I guess hers can't really be Ezekiel 23:20.
>>164458And so are most nogs.
No.164463
>>164460A based quote from a based man. Its obvious that Satan is the personification of things jews don't like which is Gentiles, Romans in particular beating their ass. It should be fit that we should demonize their false deity.
No.164468
>>164467They are also allowing muzzies to slaughter Christians in Syria, many of them White, but that's acceptable because it's ZOG's puppet regime doing it.
No.164470
>>164437Think about it, religions including the dead ones can be adapted for faggots to follow through and pretend they're hot shit.
>>164463There should be a bingo chart on how many boogeymen they've shitting out, so far there's:
>Satanist<Although satanists are the other side of the same coin>Pagan>Nazi>Doomed! No.164471
>>164469>Funny that you're not mentioning the ones at Ethiopia because they're niggers.I don't care about nons killing nons, I care about the Syrians because some of them are White.
No.164473
>>164471>I care about the Syrians because some of them are White.Not unless they're biologically European.
No.164474
>>164473White people were all over the world long before the modern era.
No.164475
>>164474But if they've been mongrelized since then, they're not white.
No.164476
>>164475That's not always true, it depends on how far back the mongrelization occurred.
We consider Spaniards, Italians, Portuguese, Finns, etc. White, despite some of them having a degree of non-European admixture from battles long past that has been bleached out. Likewise, there exist pockets of White people that carved out places in non-White lands.
Do you consider Assad White?
No.164477
>>164476>We consider Spaniards, Italians, Portuguese, Finns, etc. White, despite some of them having a degree of non-European admixture from battles long past that has been bleached out.Maybe some do individually, but at the population-wide level they're still European.
>Do you consider Assad White?No, most likely not.
No.164478
>>164477You need a micro one of these for every nation to get a breakdown of where the White and non-White genetic clusters are, within those nations.
Take a nation like Syria, for example. You're bound to have more White clusters in the regions where more Christians settled. For someone like an Assad to thrive there, with his white skin and blue eyes surviving mongrelization into the present day, suggests a rich White genetic legacy was once present in that area, being that there are many more like him. But ZOG doesn't care about them, our priority is an infinity nigger nation like Niggeria.
No.164479
>>164478Persia used to be white as fuck as well and still has a sizable minority of Aryan-looking people.
No.164911
I made the mistake of creating a Twitter account and following the "based" personalities there, including many names known to the anonymous users here.
What I basically see is a bunch of latrinx and Catholic cucks from other countries never missing an opportunity to attack white nationalist wignants and pagans.
No.164914
>>164911Can't say a lot of people who claim to espouse pro-white post christian come across well eithee on kiker but its no suprise beaners would try to use their Catholic Religion to gain acess to white spaces on the net.
No.164918
There are literally Chicanos and Alabama mixedrace gen xfags LARPing as based on Twitter and accusing anyone who makes jokes about them or posts WN pagan-related stuff of being Indian.
In fact, last month, after humiliating a bunch of spics pretending to be white, I was accused of being Indian myself.
No.164934
>>164655I figured I should mention that he apologized for this spergout on the recent Emily Youcis episode, but his position is still absolutely retarded.
>>164911The way they refer to actually pro-white people as "wignats" is pure projection. It's the Nicksuckers, Latrinos, and civnat mutts who are soft on nigger culture and their "based" groids. It's kind of funny the way them and the BAPtists go after each other when they're both trying to steer people away from proper nationalism.
>>164918They love pushing the "curse Vishnu" shit test, as if pro-whites who criticize Judeo-Christianity must be street shitters. If anything, they're less sympathetic to street shitters because even a ton of "based" Christfags usually believe that Turd Worlders aren't that bad if they truly decide to embrace Yeshua and have some holy water sprinkled on themselves. Even the right-wingers who are pagan or pagan-adjacent and actually into in Indian religion tend to be more interested in either ancient traditions that are closer to Aryan customs or esoteric stuff the average jeet doesn't practice. And I don't think I can recall seeing someone like that downplaying the problems of Indian immigration. Tom Rowsell has shown interest in ancient Indian culture in the past and mentioned how hospitable the pajeets were to him when he went to India, but he also made a Twitter post a while ago talking about all the angry anti-white messages he gets from pajeets and mainly seems to be interested in the distant Aryan connections and his own family's colonial history over there.