No.168960
>>168956The bible isn't the only source.
You're just displaying your ignorance of these religions.
No.168962
>>168960Stop pretending to be retarded.
No.169033
>>168884>proven wrong>simply repeat earlier points, only now they're pinkHow does this help you?
>but they haven't lost their chosen statusAs if we needed more evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about. The children of Israel were initially set aside by God because of faith and obedience, not because they were Jewish by blood. The excerpt you unsuccessfully quoted means that if Jews adhere to the new covenant, then they will escape eternal damnation. Does it not say in your own post that they became enemies of God?
>I would get kicked out of churches todayThe problem being? There are churches that bless fag marriages yet call themselves Christian.
>This isn't even rejecting Jewish lawDo you need to be circumcised (that is, cut your penis) to receive salvation? Yes or no? I'll wait.
>So Jews are fine and you're fine withNo need to make stuff up, anon. Just admit you were wrong and move on. I'll even be nice and not call you a kike unless you refuse.
No.169042
>>169033>How does this help you?I figured I need to break it down and make it easier to understand since you're apparently completely illiterate.
>As if we needed more evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about. The children of Israel were initially set aside by God because of faith and obedience, not because they were Jewish by blood. The excerpt you unsuccessfully quoted means that if Jews adhere to the new covenant, then they will escape eternal damnation. Does it not say in your own post that they became enemies of God?Maybe posting the passage from the Contemporary English Version will put it in a way that you can understand:
<The people of Israel are treated as God's enemies, so the good news can come to you Gentiles. But they are still the chosen ones, and God loves them because of their famous ancestors. God doesn't take back the gifts he has given or disown the people he has chosen.It says outright that they're still the chosen people despite their actions.
>Do you need to be circumcised (that is, cut your penis) to receive salvation? Yes or no? I'll wait.Is Paul rejecting circumcision? Yes or no? I'll wait. And if circumcision was considered of no value whatsoever, why did Eusebius say that the first 15 bishops of the Jerusalem church were all circumcised Jews?
>The problem being? There are churches that bless fag marriages yet call themselves Christian.There's a reason that "antisemitic" Christians are an irrelevant minority, and that's because it's not a tenable position. The Semitism is baked into the cake. You're trying to select the parts of the Bible you like a la carte and leave out the rest so you can pretend that Christianity provides any meaningful opposition to Jewish power. You can't fight international Jewry while literally worshiping a Jew who was supposedly prophesied to rule over the nations.
No.169082
>>169033He argues like a jew straight out of mein kampf.
Just ignore him.
He refuses to answer any direct questions, the best you can hope for is him replying to a question with another question or non sequitur.
He's terminally retarded and for all his typing hasn't successfully made a single point or won a single argument.
No.169085
>>169082I'll give the creature one last reply. This is probably the most anyone pays attention to him.
>>169042>Contemporary English VersionROFL
>Is Paul rejecting…I asked you a 'yes or no' question. Why the hell am I seeing all this other stuff about Paul?
>The Semitism is baked into the cakeI don't have to observe the sabbath, kill goats and sheep when I sin, dodge bacon or cut my penis to be a Christian. Nice try.
>You can't fight international Jewry while literally worshipping a JewAbraham was the first Jew. If Jesus existed before Abraham, how can this be? What alternate form did he take on in Mark 16, then? Are you trying to imply that Jesus is stuck as a Jew forever? Instead of spending your Friday evening alone tomorrow, you should go do stand-up comedy instead. I promise you'll be a big hit!
No.169093
>>169082>He argues like a jew straight out of mein kampf.Yeah, about that…
You're a moron if you think posting what the Jew scriptures plainly say and pointing out why that's a problem is arguing like a Jew. All you can do is seethe and ignore the points being made.
>>169085>ROFLYou clearly lack reading comprehension, so I thought I needed to post something dumbed down for you. Any way you slice it, Romans is clear that Yahweh hasn't given up on the Jews.
>Why the hell am I seeing all this other stuff about Paul?Because Paul's views are the topic at hand. You don't have Christianity as we know it without him.
>I don't have to observe the sabbath, kill goats and sheep when I sin, dodge bacon or cut my penis to be a Christian. Nice try.And all Noahides have to do is follow the Seven Laws of Noah. What's the problem with that, goy? Would you seriously claim that that Noahides aren't a bunch of shabbos goyim? Christians still affirm the Tanakh, that Jews had been chosen by the creator of the universe, that they were privy to spiritual knowledge those dumb goyim didn't have, and that their messiah deserves to rule over the gentiles. These Old Testament ideas continued to be promoted by the New Testament.
>Abraham was the first Jew. If Jesus existed before Abraham, how can this be?It was a gradual development. The writers of the Old Testament weren't Christians and didn't anticipate the Jesus character. As far as I know, the idea of Jesus being a preexistent being who incarnated as a Jew wasn't clearly established until the Gospel of John. Mark is arguably adoptionistic, Matthew and Luke add the virgin birth, and John equates Rabbi Yeshua with a preexistent Logos. Later on you had the slapfighting between Christians over the exact nature of the divinity of Jesus in relation to his human side. But whether you're talking about the dyophisitist Christologies of most Christians or the miaphysitism of the Oriental Orthodox Church, just about all Christian sects have considered the humanity of Jewsus to be essential to his nature and reject monophysites as filthy heretics. Christianity is Jew worship, and there's no way around that.
It's also pretty safe to say that the patriarchs were fictional characters invented well after they were supposed to have lived.
>Are you trying to imply that Jesus is stuck as a Jew forever?If he ever existed historically, then yes. He would almost certainly have been just some kike who was immortalized after his death. We don't even know that much considering the lack of historical sources and how much of his story is clearly just midrash based on reinterpretations of Old Testament passages.
No.169111
>>169093>You're a moron ifGood thing everything after "if" was an irrelevant non sequitur or I'd be the moron here!
>>169085It appears the creature still didn't answer your direct question. Very typical. He also glosses over any point anyone made and continues to make points that are founded in direct opposition to points previously made as if it never happened.
He clearly isn't arguing in good faith.
But faith and jews don't mix.
No.169113
This is the most virgin thread ever.
No.169121
>>169113You aren't exactly helping.
No.169122
>>169111>was an irrelevant non sequitur or I'd be the moron here!How is it a non sequitur when that's exactly what you're doing? It's no surprise that Christians are spiritual Jews when they argue so much like them. I'm point out that your religion is kiked to the core using its foundational texts, and you're getting assblasted and calling me Jewish. I'm not the one who worships the King of the Jews here. All you can do is get angry trying to rationalize being a submissive goytoy and bowing down before Rabbi Yeshua Hamashiach.
And why are you posting a quote from a guy whose political movement was anti-Christian?
>It appears the creature still didn't answer your direct question.My stance is exactly what your Jew scriptures state:
Circumcision is considered by Paul to be a worthy endeavor for those upholding the law but not essential. Paul says in Romans that the law is no longer binding but that it still has had its place. In other words, he's not saying that Jewish law was stupid all along. He's promoting something that would bridge the gap between gentile "God-fearers" and Jews and help bring more goyim into the fold.
>He also glosses over any point anyone made and continues to make points that are founded in direct opposition to points previously made as if it never happened.When and where did this happen?
>But faith and jews don't mix.Sure, except faith in the same god you worship.
No.169132
>>169125>How is it a non sequitur when I ignore all arguments and continually attack strawmen I createdSuch as?
>while defending jews from criticism.Yeah, I'm definitely defending Jews from criticism for pointing out that Christians are Jews' loyal henchmen and how any attempt to square Christianity with true opposition to Semitism can be expected to fall flat on its face.
No.169176
>>169175Yeah I saw this live on one of my many socks, saddest shit, pathetic.
No.169400
>>169376More like they never had any special abilities in the first place.
No.169574
>>169569There are some spiritual Semites who like to think so.
No.169584
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>guess what chuddies?
<the obsolete book of jewish fairytales was heckin' right about everything!1!1!1
Classic leftoid move just to feel supreme by quoting ancient shit that has been debunked, from the 1st testament to Das Kapital.
No.169668
>>169667Try harder.
Varg daughter got blacked. ANd he promote cuckism.
No.169670
>>169668You're pushing a universalistic menko religion created by Jews that teaches that all races are one in Rabbi Yeshua. Catholic Spaniards filled "Latin" America with mutts. Mongrels and jigaboos literally have their own Catholic saint.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Martin_de_PorresOrthotards also have their own George Floyd.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moses_the_BlackNo surprise that you're brown.
No.169696
>>169673In many ways it happened due to the Christian Kings inability to finally finish what Hadrian started.
No.169797
>>147343Apparently "devil" and "lucifer" are just ministrations:
>Devil.- The guy who divides the people>Lucifer.- Guy who antagonizesAlso the fallen angel never ruled hell, he's just some lackey who failed his deeds and now he's being punished for punching the clock in time.
No.169832
>>169831Christians never did blacked scenes.
Here the blacked pagans menko Bree daniels.