[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]

/dup/ - btfo

Political Shitposting
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

  [Go to bottom]   [Catalog]   [Return]   [Archive]
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.162705

Until recently, surveillance functioned much like a modern panopticon, creating the illusion of constant observation. But with AI, we're fast approaching a reality where it will be possible to genuinely monitor everyone, all the time.

It will become possible to instantly identify 'bad' behavior, and in some cases, even raise suspicion before it occurs. I use 'bad' in quotation marks because its definition is entirely shaped by those in power. Under the wrong circumstances, what's considered 'bad' could be a personal opinion-or even an entire ethnicity.

Social media already allows a small group of powerful oligarchs to shape what people see-and by extension, what they believe. While propaganda has always existed, social media takes it to a new level, making it harder to recognize the source. Even worse, it's personalized, creating isolated groups with entirely different sets of information and viewpoints.

With the rise of AI, however, this influence will only grow. Not only will algorithms become more advanced in how they rank and recommend content, but they'll also be able to generate fake content or messages, passing them off as organic.

I can't predict the future, but I'd bet that the majority of people won't even notice this shift. Most are tech-illiterate,and tech companies dominate the flow of information, which means any discussions about this will be limited and hard to find. It won't be a secret, per se, but discussions about it will be few and far between. When those discussions do exist, they'll likely be watered down to avoid sounding paranoid or extreme.

How does this make you feel emotionally? How would you react to it? The implications of this technology really bother me, but I know bringing it up in real life would likely make me seem paranoid, so I just keep it to myself.

 No.162706

>>162705
We already have law enforcement not acting on a lot of intelligence they have on stupid criminals, like blacks, so the extent the new AI abilities will actually be utilized is unclear.

 No.162709

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>162706
Mike that

 No.162718

>>162705
>AI-Driven Social Control Will Create a Dystopia
We are already in a Dystopia, you stupid faggot.

 No.162737

File: 1757829837793.jpeg (88.75 KB, 750x1000, 3:4, Gzy9S4PXoAAfHU1.jpeg) ImgOps iqdb

We're already there retard, why do you think there's so much investment in AI technology nowadays?

Blackrock and Vanguard tier investment companies all control financial systems through AI that manage their assets.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aladdin_(BlackRock)

AI controls your modern internet intake in normalfag websites and entertainment concepts/tropes through telemetry, which is why nothing in entertainment feels genuine as well.

 No.162747

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

 No.162761

>AI is bad
>>>/Leftypol/ /Reddit/

 No.162762

File: 1757884050822.jpg (77.07 KB, 1024x331, 1024:331, 1724802996692224.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>162705
That's crazy, but
>never once used sign-up social media
>debloat all the systems I use, cover up cameras / mics I don't
>keep most things irl + offline where possible, and everything is on tor
>regularly fuck with my own prose
I'd like to see them try + overreliance and hubris on tech just makes being a digital ghost easier and even more of a critical blindspot. So I'm insulated against the worst of it, and I can usually tell when I'm dealing with sloppa. Based off of the formatting, I'd chuckle if your post about AI generated shit is written by an AI.

You're on the money about "I'd bet that the majority of people won't even notice this shift", my mom nearly fell for an internet ad scam where they used face+voice AI sloppa to genuinely realistically impersonate a well known national consumer economist in my country into telling people to move their savings into an obvious crypto rugpull; and bless her asking me since she knew I run my own finances, but when I pointed out the dogwhistles (eg, not turning the head, static tone, etc), she looked at me like I was some s00per cyberpunk l337haxXx0r explaining netrunning to her. She even asked me to point it out to all her friends at some coffee morning, and they were bewildered too, not even being able to tell the difference even after I pointed it out, and only believed me after it had a message on the economist's site to be careful of this scam days later.
And that's just one scam with money involved, I dread to think what the average hylic normalfag is going to contend with in terms of passive 'no-stakes' media consumption.
<create a
<<<<implying you're not already living in one
The dismal part is that you probably don't even know how good things used to be. You don't even have the frame of reference, you can't even conceptualise a polite, high trust society working toward the good of it's citizenry.

 No.162777

File: 1757947547090.jpg (25.94 KB, 664x276, 166:69, EscapeNY-GUN-MAC10.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>162762
>you can't even conceptualise a polite, high trust society working toward the good of it's citizenry.
The 60s counter culture eroded every single aspect of that.

 No.162780

>>162777
Remember it wasn't just Boomers. Just read enough books written by the three previous generations and you will see that cancer was already on the rise.

 No.162815


 No.162833

>>162780
And the oldest boomers would have turned 24 in 1970. Most of them had very little responsibility for the changes of the '60s. A huge chunk of the young people were "squares" who wanted anything to do with the counterculture back then anyway. Boomers can be insufferable, but they're also a product of the system they were born into.

 No.162834

>>162833
>Most of them had very little responsibility for the changes of the '60s, because the oldest of them would have been 14-24 for the duration of the decade
>>18-25 year olds have no influence on culture
Also, they might not have been fully responsible for the 60's kumbaya-hippie-get-along shit that started it, but they sure as fuck were for the 90's when they collectively decided to put literally every / any other human on earth above their own descendants before kicking the ladder down anyways.
They might have been a product of the system, like all the unlucky groomed out and trooned out zoomers who didn't dodge the Current Year like a bullet, but that doesn't mean they didn't have their part to play in it. It's not like there was anything close to the counterculture of the today pushing back against it, both boomer mainstream and counterculture were practically in unison in causing the problems that led to today's; and they lack any shred of humility to feel shame for the actions of their peers, because they take pride in bragging about "back in their day".

 No.162835

>>162833
*who didn't want anything to do with the counterculture back then
>>162834
<18-25 year olds have no influence on culture
Culture is largely driven from the top down, and the leading counterculture personalities were majority non-boomer.
>but they sure as fuck were for the 90's when they collectively decided to put literally every / any other human on earth above their own descendants before kicking the ladder down anyways
The boomers are definitely selfish and out of touch, but I think that if any generation can be blamed for the world today it's probably the G.I. Generation. I get that a lot of them had hard lives due to experiencing the Great Depression or World War II, but all the prosperity and modern conveniences of postwar America were enough to lull them into complacency. That and I think many of them were naive enough to fall for leftist mass media messaging at a time when it was harder to find alternative sources of information. The boomers had little hope when so many of their elders were asleep at the wheel and their generation was steeped in the optimism and material abundance of the midcentury period.

 No.163380

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>162835
Further degradation of life
Its been a while
Things are worse now then last year
Life continues to be a challenge
Chronic pain and issues continue to plague me more
I am starting to dread physical social interaction
It is getting hard to keep up energy to do anything

 No.163414

File: 1759195920421.png (1.28 MB, 1324x1418, 662:709, me using a computer.png) ImgOps iqdb

>>163380
https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=z_kfXOQLpTc
Link you posted is busted. And where do you even find stuff like this kek

 No.163432

File: 1759242451249.jpg (165.49 KB, 1164x838, 582:419, truth.jpg) ImgOps Exif iqdb

>>163414
Who said i was searching ?



[Go to top] [Catalog] [Return][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ home ] [ tv / art / wooo ] [ ost / lit / bane ] [ dup / oven / dunk ] [ truth / top / ch3 ]