/dup/ - btfo

>>166477
The royal family are shitlibs and also have limited power.

>>166477
There is nothing wrong with the UK, diversity is our strenght.

>>166478
>The royal family are shitlibs
Monarchy is an inherently conservative institution. It's the conservatives who care about traditions. I think they just go along to get along as far as politics.

>>166481
The conservative mentality of people like them is only interested in preserving the liberal status quo. They certainly do nothing to preserve the countries they're supposed to be symbols of. Yeah, they might be constrained by their limited roles and supposed impartiality. But if they truly cared about their people, then they'd be willing to put their own social and political standing in jeopardy.

>>166477
Like his mother, he's only concerned with keeping his crippled institution alive / not rocking the boat too much, which ironically, means it's never been more pointless and never been more valid to eradicate it (which the New British will gladly do, once the caliphate is established). The plebs can burn for all he cares, as long as he continues to wear his hat and get his not!welfare (which might be taken off of him if he ever questions The Party). If a Rothschild pokes him around, then so be it, as long as he shuts up, he can keep the free luxury country estates he got born into, with a suite of 5* chefs and servants waiting on his every desire. Even better when strange and exotic foreign people from across "his" "empire" take the knee before him - well then they're basically equal subjects to his own nation in his eyes.
That, and elderly cancer patients with swollen boxing glove hands aren't exactly known for rocking the boat in geopolitical affairs. If anyone's going to do shit, it's his balding son once he finally kicks the bucket, but I wouldn't chalk any of the bong royals being anything less than coddled opportunists protecting their own chair before doing their nation a service. A point many people also forget - the royals haven't had an original thought in their lives, they're not just in gilded cages, they're told exactly what to think from crib to grave, which is how you end up with complete retards with no common sense like Prince Harry, the moment they breech containment and are taken out of that environment.

>>166478
>implying the King of England couldn't tap his golden staff and whisper "guards, TND send them back" and immediately have every retard football hooligan at his beck and call
That and the Royal Guard are literally a private militia that exclusively serve the Royals (even if they're also incompetent due to no real-world experience, and most of them also being hereditary). He might have limited power in terms of legislative action and what he can propose, but if he used the power he already wields and invited all of the politicians to one dinner party and had them stealth-executed, before clearing his own name (because he is literally the law manifest) nothing would legally stop him aside from reputation and how the public would react to it - which wouldn't be a problem when Queer Starmer is like the least popular, least liked politician in all of bing bong history.


tl;dr Royalty can go rotten in a lot of ways. Tyranny is the most published and feared way, but self-serving cowardice and irrelevancy is another equally self-destructive form of royal decay. Easier to execute the people telling you there are enemies at the gate, than it is dealing with the enemies.

>>166508
>might have limited power in terms of legislative action and what he can propose, but if he used the power he already wields and invited all of the politicians to one dinner party and had them stealth-executed
Also, he already has the power to dissolve Parliament and appoint a new PM. Any law they pass requires his approval. This meme that the Crown is powerless is just them playing opossum.

>>166508
Funny enough the cowardice and complacency that allows them to continue their lavish life style is going to be their end. Not today, not tomorrow, but eventually the muds will have enough barbarians in the country to feel safe in breaking into their expensive mansions and tearing the crown from their head, raping their mothers, wives and daughters, and murdering their entire bloodline. But hey, at least they won't get called islamaphobic by a bunch of marxist trannys on twitter.

>>166508
>>166573
Very true and real synopses gentlemen. It's very interesting to me that they think they won't be liquidated when the jew world order figures they're not needed anymore and that they don't want any more witnesses that are liabilities around.

Like I'm sure they got some big epstein shit on a lot of these people but still, could make many excuses with all that clout. It's not even worth the end result of collaborating.

Also there's princess diana. What's the official pol reason as to why she got murdered in that tunnel? The crime scene doesn't add up and to me it just looked like they reversed a dump truck in there as a death barricade because her entire car was slammed in.

>>166575
>It's not even worth the end result of collaborating.
They all think it isn't going to happen to them personally, so they don't care. As long as they can enjoy their trips to epstein island's current replacement their children and grandchildren can burn. But the UK's being overrun by goatfuckers pretty quick, so who knows how long they actually have?

>>166477
I seriously don't get what the point of having a king even is for cuck island

>>166583
For the same purpose any ZOG has a leader. To act as a lightning rod to prevent normalniggers with short attention spans from noticing.

>>166477
the UK is unfixable. Poland almost has the same GDP per capita at this point and its projected to exceed it. Its literally becoming a third world shithole.

>>166575
I think Diana's death is overblown honestly and my gut instinct is that if there was something off about it, it was a useful event to overhype and distract from something else happening at the time, rather than being the mystery itself (similar to how Andrew took the fall for pretty much all the Epstein files names). That's part of the Royal's "real" use these days (distraction and tourism).
Other than that, I'm willing to take the official statement that it was paparazzi (because paparazzi, especially pre-2000's really were psychotic, and one of them crashing into the car or even setting up a roadblock in a pitch-black tunnel to try to get an interview isn't unreasonable). Not because it's unreasonable they could have called a hit, but because it's irrelevant "who" did it, as much as "it happened". If there was foul play involved, the Occam's Razor take is just that it was Charles killing her off so he could make his affair with a sleazy married woman his public marriage without having to reform the Church again (rather than some deeper grand conspiracy). It's not like Diana held any real power she could use against anyone, she was just a popular princess.

>>166583
In theory it's one of the ways the government is supposed to keep itself in check (tl;dr Polybius's Kyklos; and having elements of Monarchy, Aristocracy and Democracy, to prevent the others from getting out of line). The King exists as a selfish guarantor of the people, because he (and more relevantly, his children) are the ones stuck dealing with the long-term consequences of the temporary government's actions, and is the only one who can keep the Lords in check with his own superior public support.

In practice, it's currently so corrupt, overcomplicated and stagnant to the core that everything there essentially has no power at all unless it's allowed to. The democratic arm took center stage in public affairs (since leaders are usefully cycled out regularly, like how CEO's only exist to take the blame for the people really running a corporation) while the King and the Lords became glorified luxury retirement homes for useful diplomats and administrators, revoked at a moments notice the moment they try to step out of line. Anything practical is done in the backrooms, and the structure is used to distract from itself - no change can be effected, because everything is decided in advance, and all three elements of power are bought out. If there's any place where a vote really does mean nothing, it's bongland. At best the bongish get to choose how fast the agenda gets deployed, and if they ever step out of line or vote incorrectly (eg Brexit), they will be punished and the original meaning of the vote will be turned on it's head to achieve the original goal (eg, Brexit's point was to stop the EU interfering in their country and to stop the migration of not!slaves from Eastern Europe from undercutting the working class - so instead the government negotiated a "deal" where they were a vassal state still paying into the EU with none of the former benefits, invited x4 more migrants from the third world instead, and now they're trying to rejoin the EU anyways).
Basically the same way the other historical mixed government's went bad too, because history is a flat circle. While a mixed government that tries to eliminate the kyklos is proven to be the most successful form of governance (Rome as the key example after the British Empire; and in lesser paraphrasing many of the Chinese dynasties or the Japanese Shogunate system), it's also the slowest to die off and be replaced with a new order once it goes bad (unlike a Dictator or Mob Rule, which can quickly die off and is easily upended). A lot of people have historically recognised the Kyklos (Aquinas, Confucius, La Fayette, Kant, Cicero among others all figured it out, and all pretty much by themselves), but nobody's figured out how to destroy it yet (because any proposed solution is simply a future puzzle to solve for anyone seeking power to abuse for ((themselves))) after the original person who set it out died). Even if you try to eliminate it using a different solution (eg, the USA converting each part of the kyklos into a democratically replaceable element), there's still a motive to see it made pointless by playing the long game and buying out all the institutions. Anti-kyklos governments are effective at making sure internal forces are kept in check, but lack any ability to identify and eliminate outside forces, especially without it's own in-the-process-of-being-corrupted approval. The logical progression of this line of thought is recognising the pointlessness and innate decay of power structures, leading to modern rejections such as Stirner or Kaczynski - but that's for another time.

Or, tl;dr >>166585
it's a royal dup btfo

>>166586
The political establishment woke to a startling revelation on Tuesday: Nigel Farage's Reform UK now commands enough support to secure a substantial parliamentary majority if an election were held tomorrow. A new More in Common poll of 16,000 people paints a picture of a nation in political upheaval, with traditional Labour strongholds crumbling and Westminster's balance of power tilting decisively to the right.

The numbers are stark. Reform UK would win 381 seats with just 31% of the vote, turning a minority of ballots into a commanding 115-seat majority. Meanwhile, Labour, which swept to office with confidence just 18 months ago, would be reduced to 85 MPs. That represents a loss of 326 seats, a collapse approaching the party's lowest parliamentary presence in the modern era.

https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/reform-uk-surge-nigel-farage-projected-oust-326-labour-mps-shock-new-poll-1768021

>>166588
while I'd like to think Reform can save the UK the nation is a sinking ship.

>>166588
Reform is a joke bro, Farage is and always has been controlled attentionwhore civnat opposition, as far back as 2010 when he was brought out to leech away all the votes from Nick Griffin / the BNP nationalists. You'll get the exact same shit as what happened with Geert Vilders in the Netherlands, an overhyped just-right-of-center, who does nothing (because then their grift evaporates), and has a party of incompetent sabotaging retards who make things worse in areas nobody elected them to change shit in, which then sets up the ultra-communist Green opposition government after him to win in a landslide and spoils any attempt of another "just vote right wing". Just this week Farage put forward another Muslim as his Mayor of London candidate, he's funded by Muslims, and he regularly kicks out anyone in the party that actually wants to kick any of them out. He was also the original one who said "less EU migrants, more third world migrants", and has been pretty consistent Israel firster his entire life.. Sure he'll stop the 30,000 arriving in rubber dinghies crossing the British Channel (and you'll never see the end of it), and in the same sleight of hand he'll jack up the 1,000,000 "legal" migrants arriving in planes by 150%, and ensure the ones who are in the country enjoy permanent citizenship.
Almost all of Reform at this point are the same ex-Conservative chameleons who still don't give a shit about their constituency and just want to sit in their seats, to the point you might as well call it Conform.

You're very naive to think the most authoritarian police state in the world hasn't planned for this exact eventuality.
Voting. Will. Not. Save. You.

>>166588
aren't all the parties in favor of mass immigration to replace whites?

>>166597
If what you're saying is true, the situation is more grim that I thought. Looks like the BNP was the last real chance for Britain.

>>166588
When Nick Griffin and the BNP was banned from politics was the moment England should've had riots, mass civil unrest, mass killings of the kikes responsible. They waited too long and didn't strike when the iron was hot

He could have prevented this.

>>166609
Realistically, what could Oswald have done differently? He and Hitler severely misunderstood how much of a lost cause Britian and the British people were even back then.

>>166597
>second pic
Bullshit and I don't believe it.

>>166609
>>166613
>>166617
He was still a good man.

>>166601
Thing is, he wasn't ever really formally banned, it was a pre-planned narrative. The BNP continued in some capacity up until 2019.
Nick got baited onto a "neutral" state-ran question show on his election campaign after being deliberately sleep-deprived the night before, bombarded with questions he was given no time to prepare sources for (of the "fair" show on a panel of 6 guests, 11/13 of the questions were aimed at him), at which point the ones he had the weakest answers to were gaslit into headlines that he had bombed his appearance.
Despite that, the BNP still hovered at ~22% polling approval (more than enough to win seats, despite a small hit), but then the narrative was shifted that the BNP had suffered a devastating loss (before the Internet really circumvented control of the media narrative), at which point Farage / UKIP became the most platformed British politician in living history as the based sensible moderate, and the narrative was spun that the BNP was pointless to vote for if you wanted lower migration + more nationalism. The moderates were now gone, yet at the same time, Griffin got pushed out, while Steven Yaxley-Lennon aka Tommy Robinson (a jewish convert who is still free to walk, despite living in a police state where guys get years / put into being put into deliberate designed kill-cells where they're the only white dude in a crowd of nonwhites for minor infractions like leaving bacon sandwiches on a wall, shouting at policedogs, insulting billionaire footballers on twitter, defending themselves in home invasions or waving the english flag too close to a mosque) (and that's just before the fines that can logically lead to prison time, ranging from making a tweet with the letter N in it because the autocomplete didn't finish it to No, teaching a dog to do a roman as a joke, shooting a gun while on holiday, staring aggressively, or hiding in a cemetery dressed up as a ghost and going ooooooo at people) was pushed by the media as the new face of nationalist extremism and fearful Great Satan of multicultural modernity - who then ran the extreme nationalist's reputation into the ground as useless retard racists (until his recent timely "media redemption", just in time to keep the mudslimes in check), while also diffusing their energy on pointless campaigns and leading them into literal police honeypots (and mysteriously escaping each time in unmarked taxis, and never facing any consequences).
As of now, if the bongs want to escape the infinite migration scenario, they need to get past both controlled state-media-overhyped alternative figureheads - Farage and Robinson, and get people to vote for Rupert Murdoch (the guy Farage publicly kicked out of the party for advocating for it). Which would split the vote in their first-past-the-post system, and leading to nobody getting in (like how UKIP got more votes than their Liberal Democrats, but less seats). But if they want someone who names the Jew, then there is no alternative, because Murdoch is pro-israeli too ;).

Essentially, it was the exact same thing they tried to pull on dup in 2015 during the primaries, but only failed because dup independently funded himself and the internet went around the narrative that Cruz / Rubio was the sensible choice. It's exactly what you're seeing happening with Turning Point and America First now - own both arms of the puppet (Moderate and Extreme), occasionally concede (delay) a few points as a big win for signtappers, and label anyone who rejects the puppet as either the other arm of the same puppet or the other puppet on the other hand. In the UK, the State knew exactly what it was doing, did it calmly, and everything went to plan. The UK always has been the testing ground for psyops in the West (because it's part of the British identity to endure bad conditions on the promise of benefit later on, the Keep Calm and Carry On / don't eat a cookie now and get two later / industrial revolution mindset - which worked back when traitors didn't rule the roost), and everything that happens over there is insight into civilian psychological warfare / psyops and governmental control (from how the BNP was calmly destroyed, to the "controlled spontaneity" program in response to terrorism attacks, to wordtrickery like "terrorism" or "Islamophobia" or "legal human illegal migrants", to media blackouts used in combination with media white noise to bury a story, to the MI6's press gang program in Ukraine, to their secret service giving themselves the "right" to ignore the law as long as it leads to a prosecution). It's layers upon layers of laid out literalconspiracy, which doesn't need to hide itself, because eventually you're tricked into believing one of them, after falling down a rabbithole of lies. Even if one fails, another is ineffectual, one is named and shamed like ESG-DEI-BRIDGE and one doesn't work, eventually, one won't, and each can be repeated as many times as is needed - often by multiple groups independent of one another. Every possibility and eventuality is considered by somebody, and at some point planned for - and even better, someone who sees through some of it become exhausted and despondent. The correct answer is that voting doesn't work - but that's the one thing every single step along the way will make sure you never, ever consider, and is what your "fellow, based" allies will attack you for. There's a word that perfectly describes it: Rot.
You don't just "accidentally" become a hyper-orwellian government. There is no fictional heroic scenario where The Party's lies are laid bare and the people escape the plan, or rise up in a glorious revolution and purge itself of the thousands of hydra heads (hidden away as advisors, statesmen, diplomats and infiltrators). Both Orwell and Huxley didn't write happy endings. Vote them out? Who do you trust to replace those thousands of positions? They'll get their foot back in the door with one meek, unassuming traitor and wrench it all open to corruption again. Kill them all? Assuming you have nothing to lose, and the balls to keep killing when you can't tell the difference between innocent and subversive, as well as executing women, children and the elderly despite their screams - then you really are an evil person, and you'll be turned on by the end of the week (because you'll be worse than them).
If the government that once ruled a third of Earth's landmass wasn't effective at using the state and the media against their own people, they wouldn't still be in power.

>They waited too long and didn't strike when the iron was hot
And look at you falling for the bait again.
There's never a "time" to wait for. The bongs (and the rest of the West) are frogs boiling in a pot, designed to make sure it never gets too hot or noticeable to do anything. Even if you do notice, who else around you will (assuming you aren't blackbagged once you start acting on it).
<A Message To Nationalists From Nick Griffin - Spring 2020
https://vocaroo.com/1hbIXusOoG1L

>>166621
You best start believing in controlled opposition - you're looking at one.

>>166632
This post is so based, I got nothing else to say besides the fact that its worth a read.

>>166632
>Nick got baited onto a "neutral" state-ran question show
I remember when that happened, yeah. Sickening the levels (((they))) stoop to
>living in a police state where guys get years…
Whites in America would do well to take a long, sobering look at the 2-tier English system, because its coming here. Look at that carmelo anthony nigger. What happens when the muds are literally above the law? People have to lose their fear and see that we have nothing to lose at this point.
>Steven Yaxley-Lennon leading them into literal police honeypots
I saw right thru him from the jump. Slimy little cretin
>need to get past both controlled state-media-overhyped alternative figureheads
Agree completely and would apply this to the alt-media sphere online even. All we got is our people. We gotta network, communicate, organize, and get militant. All we got in this fight is each other. Fuck an influencer, fuck a talking head. On Rumble or on CNN, fuck em all. The time for "raising awareness" has come and passed, we've won over as many as we're gonna get, its time for war
>Essentially, it was the exact same thing they tried to pull on dup in 2015 during the primaries, but only failed because dup independently funded himself and the internet went around the narrative that Cruz / Rubio was the sensible choice. It's exactly what you're seeing happening with Turning Point and America First now
Bang on the money. Your whole post is, but this segment about the parallels here particularly. I want to add, the Charlie Kirk psyop is to drum up Christian Evangelical support for another forever-war. In a rapidly divided, Balkanized country like USA, this martyrdom of Kirk is the last thing (((they))) have to try. Turning Point was always jewish neocon drivel and now its in Shapiro's hands, lol lmao. And Erika was an opportunistic power-hungry whore, the whole marriage was a sham, this whole thing was deeply planned out in advance. The cat is firmly out of the bag here, I don't think their little recruitment drive will work. A bunch of crust is kang mulattos fighting for… for… for what exactly? Its for the best our country Balkanizes
>don't eat a cookie now and get two later
I always ate the cookie. Better a bird in hand, than 2 in the bush
>There is no fictional heroic scenario where The Party's lies are laid bare and the people escape the plan, or rise up in a glorious revolution and purge itself of the thousands of hydra heads
What do you think of the encouraging things happening in Ireland? The people have had enough and are taking action, taking it to the streets and stopping invader NGO vans, torching the invader centres, etc; Ultimately these people funding the invasion and their lackeys both need to be killed, there's no getting around it. I am encouraged greatly seeing them rise up
>Kill them all? Assuming you have nothing to lose, and the balls to keep killing when you can't tell the difference between innocent and subversive, as well as executing women, children and the elderly despite their screams - then you really are an evil person, and you'll be turned on by the end of the week (because you'll be worse than them).
I respectfully agree to disagree here. The ends justify the means. Things are going to have to get very, very ugly, but I take hope in the vision of the White future that can come from it all. We can rebuild something great. There will come a point the killing will end and the rebuilding begins, anyone who just wants to kill and not build should be dealt with at that time but until then, blood must be shed

>>166639
>I respectfully agree to disagree here. The ends justify the means.

Totally agreed here. You always have to remember that nonwhites don't really do the good/evil paradigm at all. Le heckin' evilerino because you're doing what needs to be done to le heckin' innocent brownoids really shouldn't count on a moral paradigm because they don't think of us that way at all and never will. Whitey's the only one that's really bothered by that. Jamarcus or Umbuntu or Rajneesh will gladly put a bullet through your child's skull if they thought it would elevate their group a fraction of an inch and they would lose zero sleep over it. We gotta get like that.

I know this makes my american show but I am genuinely worried about the fact that the bongistanis don't seem to have any weapons of any note TO do the needful with. I seriously don't get how a violent revolution would spark off over there given that your normal bong is armed with their dicks in their hands and don't seem to have any means/plans to change that any time soon.

Never disarm your own tribe. It is beyond belief that the white man agreed to that so willingly in europe.

>>166727
>Never disarm your own tribe. It is beyond belief that the white man agreed to that so willingly in europe.
It never occurred to them that disarmament would precede the replacement immigration. They were sold a Whiteopia, what they got was a mud invasion.

>>166727
>nonwhites don't really do the good/evil paradigm at all. Le heckin' evilerino because you're doing what needs to be done to le heckin' innocent brownoids really shouldn't count on a moral paradigm because they don't think of us that way at all and never will.
100% - Law is just the Will of the ruler enforced thru strength and might. Morals, ethics, all these abstract concepts we deal with are only as good as the person enforcing them. You must bring your lessers to heel under your Might, or these terms, these morals and whatever are just that, mere words.The state of sub-humanity everyone on this planet besides Whites and East Asians live in is without morality, without ethics, without any of these ideas of good and evil. You have to have power, and you have to have a strong iron fist to enforce this stuff upon others, because naturally they are animalistic savages devoid of all forms of higher thought. Whites need to stop opticscucking, stop ethicscucking, and be ready to get dirty doing what must be done. Life is a short, brutish thing.
>We gotta get like that.
Yes we do. Enough wordplay, enough legalism, enough acting like kikes. Life is inherently a violent, ruthless thing. We must enforce our Law upon them, we must dominate. People wanna believe Life is something that its not. People watch too much TV
>European disarmament
It is really pathetic how willingly Euros cucked out to their gov't. Urban shitlibs in America will do the same thing. A gun is just a tool, its about the will and the strength of the person behind it that matters. Libtards think making a show of how weak and "kind" they are amounts to fuck all in the real world, its just laying down and painting a big red bullseye on their ass for the brown hordes lmao. Let them all die. We don't need to let having guns lull us into a sense of complacency, and we still need to hit the gym and be strong in physical fitness abilities for when it goes hand-to-hand. Only weak, dysgenic people fall for the (((David Hogg))) of the world, if that same limpwristed propaganda that disarmed Europe works on them, they are weak in the mind, too weak for Life. It is really pathetic how easily Europe disarmed themselves

>>166742
>Pic
You're aware that Zapata was an illiterate faggot, right? Most of his quotes were written by his boyfriend.

>>166745
its a good quote and applicable to our people. the quote is more important than the man

>>166746
The guy was a faggot and the quote is an innuendo about gay sex.

>>166748
Are you going to address anything in my post or pilpul like a fag?

>>166750
I agree with everything you said, it's a good post, I was just shitposting because the quote has new context in light of the fact that Zapata was a faggot.

>>166629
He had his problems (I remember reading something about him trying to take credit for some of Francis Parker Yockey's work), but his vision was ahead of its time in some ways. I'm getting really sick of wasting time with petty nationalist dick measuring contests.

>>166751
Oh right then. Sorry

>>166751
>Zapata was a faggot
Everyone in history was a faggot, so that is why i don't believe when they say some long gone guy/gal had mental illness

no……
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

>>166752
Petty Nationalist can go jump off a cliff and die, if Europeans wanna survive the future which is now, they must unite. I am not saying we should mix ethnically entirely, but we should unite as one federation. This is only possible by ridding our (((leaders))) and slavemasters. That time is coming where we must truly do something, the youth don't wish to die, let those who wish to die, die. Those who wish to live will simply live and carry on our traditions forever.

>>167115
Our collective ship is going down, and everyone just wants to point fingers at other people and lionize themselves instead of trying to mitigate our losses and ensure there's even a future for ourselves.
>>167122
Where did he advocate for trying to stamp out local differences? The point is that our collective survival should come first. Whites as an entire race are a small minority of the world population and can't afford to myopically put narrow, parochial identities above group survival. That doesn't mean that the more local identities have to be entirely discarded.

>>167127
>Whites as an entire race are a small minority of the world population
globalize
>and can't afford to myopically put narrow, parochial identities above group survival. That doesn't mean that the more local identities have to be entirely discarded.
homogenate

You are New World, very certainly American, and it shows.
We already had almost a century of the EU "organising" and "setting aside differences for survival on the world stage". and it where has it led. An easy attack vector, which is easily subverted, easily strongarmed and easily turned against Europe; and that has completely failed to stamp out national differences despite it's best efforts. Europe is and always has been a complex web of hyperstrong, hyperhostile fortresses states glued together with geography, grudges and rivalries, and only set aside temporarily if it is more individually convenient. It's what let it maintain dominance over the known world at almost every point in history, and ignoring it is why all that currently stands are weak-wristed realpolitik diplomats bickering at each other, with no individual power or ambition (set aside for the good of yuro) and barely any collective power (because they still hate each other and won't get fooled again, like how the Greeks got completely screwed over by the Germans for trusting the EU too much, or the Serbs got cucked out of deleting Bosnian Mohammedeens / removing kebab off the map despite most of Europe being in favor of it individually, or etc etc).
The realistic implementation is that you are advocating for a Han-Chinese / Amerimutt style of total ethnic eradication for a "higher" shared identity, and it's not going to happen just because shitskins that regularly lose 10:1 when whites have their shit together, are being let in by those exact same "ignore your heritage" / "one race, the white race human race" organisations. This is even before the laughable idea that yuropean whites would align with the mutted ex-colonials of other yuros, or the ex-colonial whites would accept taking orders from the countries their foundational national identity is being independent from.
Sound good in your head, but it has already been tried, and it has already been failed. Whites will naturally stay out of the way of each other's ambitions when left to their own devices (unless you're a German in the early 20th century, which is why everyone still hates them), but clumping them together just means everyone steps on each others toes and goes nowhere.

>>167136
>you strike me as American
If I sound like Yockey in the sense that I advocate for a Pan-European Imperium on the long term, then that sounds okay to me. At the moment it's unrealistic so I advise for a federation/alliance of Europe where they actually have their militaries focus on securing Europe in an almost North-Korean-like fashion. Total war and eradication against the merchant class for selling us out to the kikes.

Maybe I'm just for that because I'd rather be loyal to an actual state of Europeans. In part, my people as a whole seem to be beyond saving for the most part. At some point I planned on taking my bags and surviving in whatever SS I thought would spring out of Europe's future revolution in the future, but at this point I'm not sure if that's ever happening.

The idea that Europe at this point isn't a vassal state of amerimutt land is laughable. In actual Geo-politics, Europe has the choice to continue its disastrous "cooperation" with Britain and Amerimuttland, or to actually gang a level of independence and do What Bismark did and try to align with Russia.

>You are New World, very certainly American, and it shows.
Europeans in the new world are about as divided as Europeans in the old, Canucks hate Amerimutts, Europeans in South America seem to have a resentment for Americans rather than a resentment for ZOG.

>unless you're a German in the early 20th century, which is why everyone still hates them
Germany would have ruled Europe and made it a strong continent for centuries to come had they won the first world war or the second. It was Britain and by extension France that didn't want Germany to dominate Europe, and of course the Russian nobilities resentment towards Germany that caused them to align with France rather than an ally that actually had direct blood-connections to them when it came to their monarchies and shared traditional values.

Shame Germany in the second world war didn't have a concept of more of a waiting game. He should have let Mussolini build up the Italian Navy and force Franco into the group. He should have tried to help the Fascist take control in France. Hitler was to concerne with the way the Poles were wrongfully persecuting the Germans and started the war earlier than he should have. Its also a shame Hitler was an anglophile, and he didn't firebomb London into oblivion and sea lion Britian. London would be a beautiful city today had he did such a thing.

>The realistic implementation is that you are advocating for a Han-Chinese / Amerimutt style of total ethnic eradication for a "higher" shared identity
I'm not for this at all, but I can see the West coming to an end soon, just as the Romans fell apart, and eventually the Franks become the French and the Germans, I can see the rise and fall of ethnicities throughout history. I'd rather the best of the European race survives than dies off in some petty faggot wars.

>Europe is and always has been a complex web of hyperstrong, hyperhostile fortresses states glued together with geography, grudges and rivalries, and only set aside temporarily if it is more individually convenient.

That doesn't work anymore when your deindustrialized and also when you exported all the technology you used to conquer the Third World to it and the second. Now all of those savages are twice your population, armed to the teethe, and they smell blood in the water. Spengler warned of this.

The safe future of for Europeans in cooperation or being raped to death, and to emulate North Korea in the sense that you should always be an insanely militarized state. They made nukes with no one else's help on tiny soil, if they can do it, we can.