No.169322
>>169317It's real. They're going to loop around the darkside of the Moon and come back.
Artemis III they're gonna LAND on the Moon in 2028.
No.169323
>>169322>Artemis III they're gonna LAND on the Moon in 2028.Why, what's the point now after all these decades?
No.169330
>>169323The plan is for a moonbase down the road, like in Doom.
No.169331
>>169317>Guise guise, the moon landing was staged<Because of Elmo Muskolini!1!1!1!1WOW how fucking easy it is for these retards to believe debooonked conspiracy theories they usted to shit on because of their boogeymen. When they're going to side with flat-earthers?
No.169340
>>169338women aren't smart enough for that, you'd need nazis to get to the moon.
No.169387
>>169337If they really believed in her ability they'd let her pilot the ship. But we all know Canada is literally Nazi Germany and will just have her in a back seat to be used as decoration so they can act like they're not racists, xenophobic, transphobic, sexist, bigots.
No.169409
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Space may be the final frontier, but it's made in a Hollywood basement
No.169479
>>169464
Why would it need to be? Do you not believe that the Moon exists?
No.169571
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Full Artemis II re-entry to Earth, splashdown landing & crew recovery from Orion post-moon mission
No.169594
>>169479The moon definitely exists, but we've never been there. Also,
they don't want you to know that it's flat just like Earth. Wake up!
No.169755
Might I ask conspiratards what is the point in faking the moon and nukes, how is it so powerful of a conspiracy they have covered everything up. It is just baffling to me that such literal retardation even exists at this point.
No.169777
>>169756Try to actually disprove it, I know the CIA made fake stuff but there is public scientific papers to back up a lot of modern technology anyone can read.
No.169778
>>169755P.T. Barnum said there's a sucker born every minute, I'd like to expand that and say there's a grifter born every 20 minutes.
No.169782
>>169755The moon landing was fake and gay, seeing that nasa got sloppy with their fake shit like pulling wires and using green screens only an idiot puts it past them.
Question is more if the ISS exists, I would say most likely it does. However that's not a lot of activity to siphon billions so they have to make some green screen shit to impress and train how to be in 0G. And it's more fun than the mundane tiresome life of being stuck in a orbiting capsule.
Anyway 60 Years is a long time not going back to the moon for a country supposedly capable of such a feat.
(Because they were never on the moon, deal with it faggot.)Nuclear power does generate vast amounts of energy, and criticality does exist, there are hydrogen bombs as well. So I don't see the problem. The question is if the nations that allegedly possess nukes even have the real launch codes to arm their weapons without having to call up roth5child and the bogdanoffs.
No.169783
>>169782You seem very convinced it was fake, but you didn't answer the question. Why was it fake?
No.169787
>>169786What was the point?
No.169788
>>169787I'm sorry but if you can't begin to understand the ridiculousness of that simple point you'll understand nothing else i could write to you.
No.169789
>>169788I understand you think it's ridiculous that it has been nearly 60 years since the last manned mission. The question is, what is the motivation to fake a manned moon program?
No.169916
>>169317There was a shooting at Tenochtitlan, was that also staged?
No.169939
>>169916Shootings are a lot easier to stage than a moon mission, it's not even in the same league.