/truth/ - Paranomal

>>4716
What next? "Tartaria"?

>>4717
What do you mean?

>>4716
Define knowledgable.
I have an alternate theory, but I haven't worked out the math. As for the mudflood stuff…
The way I understand it is a worldwide cataclysm occurred. Earthquakes caused liquifaction to cause buildings to sink which had to be dug out, or sunken floors were converted into basements. Either an old world order existed with a worldwide empire that was destroyed by the NWO+kikes that had control of ships that sent governors to all areas that had surviving city infrastructure, or the buildings were actual electricity harnessing structures that distributed and stored electricity to cities which were subsequently taken over by the NWO/kikes in the same manner. There's a video I saw recently that showed Eiffel towers existing all over the world.
I could guess that either orphans existed en masse because of dead parents, or extreme repopulation practices occurred to make up for the dead.
Illuminati/NWO set up governments which were met with rebellions. Apparently every major country had a rebellion in the early 1800s. Think War of 1812 in USA. All history was written over. 1000 years invented between ~1800 and 800, making the current year more like ~1024. Industrialized education is essentially indoctrination into an entirely false narrative even down to the shape of the earth.

I've heard some tangential theories that there was actual wars using absurdly high tech weaponry that melted stone buildings which are the ruins of ancient civilizations. I'll have to search for those relevant pics. here's some random architecture.

Some modern histories will claim that Romans visited Japan and brought them aqueduct construction to explain some brick water canals that irrigate some gardens that are absurdly ancient and still in use. Again not pictured but random pics.

>>4723
This implies that the revolutionary war was made up regarding USA's history. The Napoleonic wars didn't happen. Napoleon didn't exist. Apparently there's tons of repeating dates like they were made up by someone or a group of people.

Here's some retard talking about the towers.
It might be /truth/ that these buildings are what actually generate electricity, not dams and burning shit. And that we're paying electricity companies basically for nothing in exchange because electricity comes from the aether.

>>4724
I was just thinking about how the very way classical warfare is presented, i.e. the "cannon fodder" method of warfare, with waves of troops foolishly marching toward each other, without armor, may be a falsehood.

>>4726
The only thing I can think of is the Generals orchestrated battles with the intent of getting their soldiers killed because that was the plan all along. It's just hard to believe men following along with it.
But that's interesting that it's possible that form of warfare never even existed. kek
Just another long line of abuses where we were made to look at people from the past as stupid or something to that effect.

The premise of electricity harnessing
>Can't spell electricity without "city"
was that the gold in the ornamental dome points act as antenna which were later converted into religious symbols to obfuscate the technological purposes. The gold attracts the electricity first. These old buildings used to have ornaments in them on the inside that housed mercury. Through a process of alchemy, the electricity funneled into the columns of the buildings which acted as batteries housing the electricity. Doesn't the arc building look like an acme magnet?

>>4727
>The only thing I can think of is the Generals orchestrated battles with the intent of getting their soldiers killed because that was the plan all along. It's just hard to believe men following along with it.
I mean it's possible if these men were so impoverished that they had no choice in the matter, it was either fight and get paid or literally starve, your family starves, you just pray you manage to survive the battle and live to see another day.
>Just another long line of abuses where we were made to look at people from the past as stupid or something to that effect.
What's strange to me is that warriors had armor in medieval times, but at least from Revolutionary War times on, it's like everybody gave up on armor entirely, even though technology had progressed. They just march toward death in their fancy uniforms.

>>4728
A tangential explanation I heard is that this electricity harnessing is distributed through waterways. Not a current strong enough to electrocute you I would think, but it energizes the waters producing incredible vitality in humans and animals that drink it or bathe in it. Also it remarkably stimulates plants to grow fantastically. And that churches were resonating beacons. The ornate windows weren't filled in with glass but were meant to shape the sounds or resonate frequencies from the organ pipes outward over farms, that the royal palace gardens were actually farms.
I think the common theory is that the richat structure in Africa was Atlantis which was a massive starfort in a manner of speaking, a city with these intricate, charged waterways connecting the entire city.

>>4729
Yeah they weren't worried about mobility. They were standing fixed generally. I suppose they would have to retreat, but wouldn't they want to increase their chances of victory in the battle? Makes no sense.

>>4722
Aqueducts in question.
I think the actual historical explanation is that some Romans traveled to Japan and had them build this which has lasted forever.

>>4732
The water flows in a trench at the top.