No.156105
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>156091He'll move the goalpost as usual, just like when being questioned on whether or not animes can led to a self-mutilation path.
No.156111
>>156105It's just weird man, if the guy just said he wanted to jerk off to children, at least his defense of lolishit would make sense. I guess he realizes that taking that angle just means his opinions are immediately discarded as a pedo justifying his actions, but the way he presents all this just turns it into a incoherent mess, where he both rails against degenerate porn but believes lolishit is a fucking artform.
No.156174
>>156111Because he can't be publicly honest with himself, the fact that he moves the goalpost is living proof that he thinks liking loliporn makes him a pedo. He probably also thinks there isn't anything wrong with that but has to maintain the illusion that hes some sort of intellectual to be taken seriously.
Like you just said if he truly admits to being a pedo hes a pedo and everything he says can be discarded as subversive trash so hes trying desperately play jewish tricks to showcase an otherwise different view. It's not about it making sense its about being a little kike and dancing around his statements that don't make sense but confuse and sound like hes sure of himself.
No.156194
>>156174Fucking not4chan (not to be confused with 4chan itself) was infamous for using lolishit to avoid getting shut down under the excuse of:
>Just drawings broWhile sneaking in photos of real life children getting stalked.
No.156228
Loli=free speech
get over it you stupid newfags
No.156229
Imageboards were always shit. They were shit because they were either dead or had too much traffic. Not censored enough or censored too much. No balance. This applies to the rest of the Internet too of course.
No.156235
>>156228In some places, sure, but that doesn't mean the only people that like that shit arn't pedophiles.
No.156277
>>156228On Infinity the dost test was the free speech test. Scat and gore too. Loli ain't even a little illegal, what when you can't card a drawing. You can't prove it's poop also and the gore isn't technically alwayas illegal….and dost test is dost test… You know some imageboards filter posts typing dost? I wonder if this is one of them. Zoomer age imageboards are afraid of sissy hypno in contrast….and nigger dick…
>>150485>>150490sleepychan is what made me give up and get a job tbh Internet is boring. Never got banned so easily in my life for not breaking rules. First the /r9k/ for posting in meta about rules being unfair/dumb, then /v/ for using the word zoomer ("what is this lainchan?"), then /b/ eventually for posting bad takes and rants too often to the point everyone outed me as a boogieman. Out of every imageboard I've ever used, the admin literally went and got help to get rid of me! I caused mods! Without rule breaking! But no, they are not pedos. Pedo discussion literally gets you banned in current year sleepy. The word dost would get you an auto-ban, 24 hour, probably. I got an auto-ban for even global reporting cp once. I guess I reported it too slowly. They don't even have good taste in porn, the loli they post is extremely boring. Vanilla as hell.
I bet half the userbase looking shadey is why the feds shoah'd anonycafe.
The site names were too boring to remember though.
>>156235I miss /b2/ wherein I would try to deprogram normalfags and feds to realize pedos are not even real. It is a social construct.
No.156551
>>156285>janniesand back to cuckchan you go
No.156575
>>156285You hit the nail on the head. Koipedo, Cakekike, cuckchan, no matter where or who, moderating video game boards is always the worst.
No.156978
>>155985Source on the anime?
No.157054
>>157041kek, its really all that matters to them, why would anyone want these (((rootless))) pedos to invest their imageboard.
No.157055
>>157041Why is the text microscopic?
No.157065
>>157055Time to get some glasses, grandpa.
No.157067
>>157065I can read it fine, it's just not optimal to be reading text so small.
No.157068
>>157067>backpeddling on his original claim that he can't read it due to the text's tiny sizeOkay grandpa, remember to change out your depends and drink your prune juice to stay regular
No.157408
>>157041>>157383What happened with kohl? People there used to be a bunch of faggots, the kind of people so autistic and unfunny that nobody else wanted them around back in the days.
No.157409
>>157383Why are you so opposed to lg posting that you brought a screencap over from a different chan about it? Got something you want to tell us?
No.157431
>>157383Who could have guessed that the moralfag is a kiwitranny? Go back to sucking daddy josh "neko shota" faggots dick.
No.157432
>>157431What are you talking about? I didn't click on that video.
No.157784
>>157041loli rules are pretty violent in russia, so sadly I won't allow it but Blue Archive or some generally known IPs are considered ok, as long as there is restriction in that, also kohlchan is fucking gay and the admin is glownigga
No.157799
>>157784What's Blue Archive?
No.158888
based thread
No.158900
>>157799One of the many shitty Gacha ASSFAGGOTS games that shackle the goyim from facing their harsh reality.
No.160332
so what
No.163042
save
No.163047
>>163043
Ramon always eats well, it's no wonder he arouses so much envy in those starving for love and meat.
No.164910
This blows ramoncock
No.166440
>>160363average "based" anon on some of these various free peach imageboards that happen to allow pedophiles through the cracks.
No.166443
>>166440But he's right. Being into teenagers isn't pedophilia.
No.166444
>>166443Yeah I agree but 9/10 of these anons would just wanna groom a teenage girl into a fucktoy rather than be an actual traditional husband so I take nothing they say seriously.
No.166460
>>160363Guess my surprise when I learn he's trooning out
No.169372
bring it bakc
No.169384
>>166444you are a newfaggot dipshit
No.169386
>>166444>Yeah I agree but 9/10 of these anons would just wanna groom a teenage girl into a fucktoy rather than be an actual traditional husbandDo you have a source for your bold claim?
No.169399
>>169398>dickridingNot him, but you talk like a faggot. Stop.