No.165796
>>165790Homofag jewtube movie
shillsreviewers who are "popular" because they regurgitate whatever paint-drinking takes reddit tannys have or whatever opinion pedowood bribes them to have.
No.165802
>>165790They were popular because they used to be funny, and they used to have a reputation for giving cynical and incisive movie reviews. But they've completely lost any drive or passion, and the cat's out of the bag for a long time now in regard to their lack of movie knowledge and integrity. They've had completely wishy-washy and even downright retarded takes, and it's like they just totally stagnated on exploring anything outside of their comfort zone instead of growing as movie aficionados. I think Jay Bauman might have even said that he hadn't seen a John Ford movie until relatively recently. They certainly don't seem to know much about movies prior to the New Hollywood era. They just come across as smug, out of touch, and even bitchy sometimes despite all these flaws.
t. former fan
No.165803
>>165802>>165796Thank you for the explanations. I know now to avoid them.
Brother Merry Christmas.
No.165829
>>165802>used to be funnyPost something funny
No.165830
>>165802They also made a movie of their own, Space Cop, which is unironically, not joking, the single least funny, shittiest "film" I've seen a youtube film crew make which is saying something. To waste that much breath telling the world how shit so many movies are only to make a movie yourself and have it be this level of not even remotely smile-worthy is frankly astounding. Space Cop was awful. There's just nothing there.
Mike should've played space cop and Rich should've played mike's character. I don't get why they cast the wacky fat guy as the dour serious guy and the dour fat guy as the wacky guy No.165846
>>165829The old Plinkett review where Mike touched on racial diversity in Star Wars and showed a picture of Nien Nunb when mentioning Hispanic people. That's something they'd be too chickenshit to do nowadays.
>>165830They made movies other than that. Space Cop has such an awful reputation that I always avoided it, but I did see Feeding Frenzy before Space Cop was released and thought it was okay for a few guys messing around. I don't know if I'd like it the least bit today.
No.165912
>>165846>The old Plinkett review where Mike touched on racial diversity in Star Wars and showed a picture of Nien Nunb when mentioning Hispanic people. That's something they'd be too chickenshit to do nowadays.Post it if that is true.
No.165938
>>165789the actual core thesis of the film is that LGBTQ is being promoted by white people to intentionally sterilize black people
that's too hateful for the reddit letter media crew
No.165939
>>165938Nah. It was just that gay nigger's thinly disguised fetish. He lusts for White dick, but since he's a nigger race grifter he can't admit it so he has to jump through hoops to explain why he spends every waking hour thinking about White men and why he commissioned so much White on nigger gay porn.
No.165953
>>165944This man is maybe the best homo race grifter in the game.
A buck so broken that he turned the lust for the BWC into a career. If you love what you do; you'll never work a day.
No.165955
>>165944Fucking lol. I know niggers are retarded, but how the fuck do even they take this gay nigger seriously?
No.165959
>>165958The ultimate fruity scammer.
No.165963
>>165959That was "Dr." Kang. That gay nigger pedo cokehead is credited for destroying pretty much all of civilization.
No.165977
>>165958Do people still give a fuck about NFT's?
No.165984
>>165977People? No. Retarded porch monkeys? If you frame it as pro-nigger then coons will throw their welfare checks at anything.
No.166013
>>165984black people aren't smart enough to buy nfts
No.166022
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
No.166024
>>166013But the kikes in charge of nigsneed are smart enough to simplify it to the point where niggers can spend their EBT on them.
No.166095
>>166072>picHe definitely got ratio'd, chubby chasers are the most insufferable faggots specially the oil drillers.
No.167244
>>167238tate will never recover from this
No.167249
>>167244is impossible for him to recover ever, he is a mutt that is butthurt about white people
No.167362
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Has anyone notice this trend of faggots using cartoon/videogame characters whenever they stand on a soapbox? Bonus if they happen to be lewd autists.
No.167363
>>167362Because it's literal propaganda that they've been subjected to since they were children.
You should know this if you broke the conditioning.
No.167383
>>167363>faggy porterTrooncels literally can't conceptualize anything outside of the reference of their goyslop pedowood movies.
No.167404
>>167361Yes, those guys are clearly as American as apple pie.
No.167427
>>167404What the fuck is being "American" at this point?
It's been civic nationalism for fucking decades now, arguably since the Civil War.
No.167430
>>167427Before Hart-Celler, being American meant being White. People from that era who talk about Americans are thinking of White people.
No.167435
>>167383I'm glad I still never watched any of them or read any of the books that were shilled so hard by the "educational" establishment back in the 2000s.
>>167427>What the fuck is being "American" at this point?There are historically based definitions and then modern ones. The latter type is completely incoherent. Civnats love to go on about traits like hard work and vague "values" being the main bases for American identity, which is both historically inaccurate and nonsensical. Working hard is a trait that can be found anywhere (although definitely in some places more than others), so they're basically saying that some sweatshop worker in China is as American as anyone. If anyone is a potential American, then what exactly is so meaningful about being an American? The more inclusive and all-encompassing a category becomes, the less meaningful it is. Civic institutions also have little relevance to nationality, and the civnat conception also leads to people conflating the nation with the state. Nationality pertains to descent from a people with shared blood and cultural origins. "Muh Constitution" in and of itself isn't a foundation for nationality, and even an American who disagrees with the people who founded the American state will still be an American. To say otherwise would be a bit like saying that Nietzsche was somehow not a German because he criticized his own people and larped as Polish.
Either the historical definition is recognized as the correct one, or the concept of being "American" should be downplayed as something no longer very relevant. America's historical European roots are its most essential aspect. Do you even think a non-white culture would have produced something like the Bill of Rights? I'd much rather have descendants who settle down with whites from overseas than a "fellow American" with mongrelized or entirely dissimilar ancestry to the types of people who built and populated North America prior to 1900 or so.
>arguably since the Civil War.That's a fair point, but a lot of the poz from that era ended up getting rolled back.
>>167430Even after Hart-Celler a lot of people would picture people who look like white jocks from an '80s teen movie when they thought of Americans. I remember reading a story of a Chinese woman with American citizenship going to an embassy building in China and getting laughed at by the Chinese guards when she called herself an American and told that she wasn't one.
No.167450
>>167435>I'm glad I still never watched any of them or read any of the booksAmen. That shit looks turbo gay and the obsession leftiods had with it before the author said that men in dresses shouldn't be allowed to follow little girls into public restrooms just proves it has nothing of worth.
No.167534
>>167435>Nationality pertains to descent from a people with shared blood and cultural origins.Americans never really had that considering they had a bunch of European origins, a shared religion maybe.
No.167538
>>167534>Americans never really had that considering they had a bunch of European origins, a shared religion maybe.The main thing is that they were European, and mostly Northwestern European at that. Maybe there's a more accurate modern estimate out there, but also about 80% of colonial Americans were of British Isles descent going off my memory of what Lothrop Stoddard wrote in Reforging America. Their shared roots might be more broad, but Americans are a specific breed of New World Europeans whose identity grew out of the old frontier culture and tensions with Indians and Africans.
No.167570
>>167569I've heard LBJ was a kike himself.
No.167571
>>167570He and his dad sure look the part, but he was a part of this Christian sect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christadelphians No.167574
>>167569And thanks to that the US turned into the strongest nation of the world.
No.167576
>>167575What the fuck is wrong with subhumans?
No.167606
>>167576It would be easier to list what isn't.
No.167621
>>167574Strongest STD Nation
No.167622
>>167574America was already strong. You can trace the decline of America to the
Snivel Rights Act and Hart-Celler Act. If we didn't spend trillions in welfare on illegals and niggers, maybe we'd have better infrastructure and trains.
[View All] (530 posts and 287 image replies omitted)