/dup/ - btfo

>>174478
You sound like the one projecting here. Also, point on the doll where the "fedora faggots" hurt you, pussy.

>>174479
Even your damage control sounds like something from a run of the mill troll farm. Russian bots spit better shit than that. Fear not, your virginity will never be harmed. Now go dig in your meme folder for more washed up Penn and teller pics like this is 2010.

>>174480
>skidmark is going to hell
Checks out.

>>174479
Penn & Teller are gay jews.

>>174480
>>174481
>>174482
>>174483
Go cry to skydaddy about it, church bois

>>174481
>Russian bots spit better shit than that
are you a fed?

>>174484
What's all this image macro meme shit? Is this all your arguments against American Christians? "Hey guys while I was sucking a troon dick and living my mother's basement I saw a meme were a Christian couple adopted nigger babies. Let's use this against them"

If that's the case friend, I can show you countless examples of you atheist fags and especially satanists getting bukkaked by everything from Niggers to animals. Or how about my favorite example, COMMUNISM. Our favorite atheist/satanist invention.

Keep digging in your meme folder faggot.

>>174485
You do realize you're a Kremlin sponsored Web Brigade agent and you're trying to call anyone who outs you a fed/cia/mossad/polish/ukrainian spy right?

Don't get me wrong. While fedora atheists lost the battle back in the pre-2010s, you vatnik shit eating slav faggots never had any case outside of your Kruchev style banging your shoe on a table. Or in this case crying over how innocent Putin/Russia is. Fuck off you commie cunt nugget. Get the fuck off the American internet.

And you're most likely going to get raped once your drafted btw.

>>174487
>>174488
>everyone who's not a christcuckold is a Russian agent of Vladmir Pooooootan!! Slav man bad! Slav man bad!
Holy shit dude, I want some of what you're smoking

>>174488
Nuzach?

>>174491
Because Green texting is an easy way to put words in someone's mouth like Putin puts his micro-penis in yours right? NO.
The irony is that you're actually attempting a gaslighting attack, when it is true you're a kremlin web brigade. Best you're a limbless vatnik working as a propagandists on multiple accounts (keeps you out the meatwave Z army), at the worst you're automated.
And it's one of the lamest defense mechanisms you incompetent and utter no good commie cock suckers deploy. Other than the typical call him an agent bullshit. You've been deploying this bullshit for the past 15 fucking years! You think we won't find out?

>>174478
>because they were your mortal enemy against you getting buttfucked by a troon
Then they were a complete failure, since they did nothing from stopping their churches from getting overrun by trannies. How can those based Christians save society like they claim they can when they can't even save their own churches?
>>174481
>Russian bots spit better shit than that.
The Russian government is promoting the "evil godless West vs. trad Christian Russia" narrative and pushing the Abrahamic controlled dialectic dynamic.
>>174484
Now this is Christpilled.

>>174501
is that an Orthodox priest beside that Jewish pride flag memorial?

>>174501
So according to polls. Actual polls, not memes you find off imageboards full of anime masturbators like yourself, the census of Christians who vehemently oppose transgenderism is approximately 87%.
This is in comparison to 67% of agnostics and 75% of Atheists who are IN FAVOR of transgender bullshit.
So for now I want you to do me a favor. I want you go back in your little internet meme folder you got from all the lonely nights you were jerking of with other men, and try to find something of actual data and sustenance.
Using cherry picking of pictures from non-Christian "churches" does not make your point.

>>174497
LOL DEAD KIKE ON A STICK

>>174504
Merry christmas !

>>174502
From what I can tell from skimming the site, it's actually a kooky Baptist church that uses Eastern Orthodox liturgy and aesthetics and promotes interfaith and LGBLTBBQ+ goofiness.
https://peacecathedraltbilisi.org/the-peace-cathedral/
>>174503
>the census of Christians who vehemently oppose transgenderism is approximately 87%.
You're cherry picking the percentage. It's 87% of white evangelical Protestants who reportedly believe that gender is determined by sex at birth. The percentage for black Protestants is 70%, non-evangelical white protestants are 63%, and Catholics as a whole are 62% according to the Pew results.

If Christians as a whole were 87% opposed to the tranny stuff, then that would really be pathetic given that you can drive past mainline churches in small towns out in the sticks and still see them festooned with "Pride Month" decorations.

I also wonder how much of the social conservatism is due to the influence of boomers, since millennials are more socially liberal.

Clinging to Christianity as an attempt to hold back the trannies isn't going to work unless you're also willing to jettison white demographics, since Christianity's demographics are increasingly shifted to the Third World and Christianity puts religious solidarity above racial solidarity. The whole thing's a sinking ship. You can either have Christianity or a pro-white religion.
>This is in comparison to 67% of agnostics and 75% of Atheists who are IN FAVOR of transgender bullshit.
It's 58% for if you look at the "religiously unaffiliated" category as a whole, but that's still too many.

Unfortunately, a lot of people who give up on religion seem to think that the problem with Christianity is that it isn't doing enough to live up to the slave morality of the Gospels and not the fact that it's self-serving Jewish superstition that promotes a negative value system.
>Using cherry picking of pictures from non-Christian "churches" does not make your point.
They're not non-Christian just because they disagree with your flavor of Christianity.
>>174504
Yeshua was a 6'5 blond Aryan berserker.

>>174507
Will there ever be a form of Christfaggotry that any christfaggot agrees on?

>pagan exposed post deleted
>christian hate allowed

You just admitted your weakness.

>>174507
>>174508

I literally just argued with either you or some other fedora who did only cherry pick memes about how suddenly Christianity, who was the staunchest opponent against transgenderism or any other mainstream backwardness, was somehow the procurer/bearer of that very social deprecating practice. And here you are accusing me of cherry picking. Not only that in your rebuttal you offer a bunch of anecdotal evidence, eg "I once a saw a church with rainbow flags"

Quite literally the Word says make men effeminate:
>Romans 1:27
>And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

>Romans 1:26-27
>For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

>1 Timothy 1:10
>the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,

>Jude 1:7
>just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.

Now find me where you believe somehow Christianity is the procurer of tranny faggots because you passed by a compromised satanic "church" with a rainbow flag?

Then there's your terrible argument of "it's a sinking ship" Literally a culture of God, that has lasted eons, is somehow to replaced by your edgy fedora library of recently acquired political movements, will supersede the mandates of God Himself. You guys remember this shit? The French Revolution, Bolsheviks, the Frankfurt school, modern day secularist "humanism", population control, etc etc etc. My favorite part about this is how you idiots on these stupid imagehosting sites feel that the new secularist ideology that a fellow basement dweller thought up will now be the cure all for all social ills. Very well Karl Marx, please tell us more when you're done jacking off to cartoon ponies. Or will you regurgitate the old Nordic fetishism (which Hitler himself thought was silly) or for National Socialism which you build as an altar to your new saviors?

And for your information, yes they are non-Christian. You can't suddenly throw the spine, Jesus Christ/God, out of the window and then establish yourself somehow as a "Christian" church. It's like you claiming the last woman who left you for a street hoodlum with sagging pants and dreadlocks, is somehow still your girlfriend.

>>174504

LOL…added to filter

>>174507
>all that bullshit
No one believes in Christianity except for geriatrics and brown people.

>>174508
Not likely. They've been at each other's throats since the beginning of their religion.
>>174513
>And here you are accusing me of cherry picking.
You said it was 87% when that was only the percentage for white evangelical Protestants in particular.
>Not only that in your rebuttal you offer a bunch of anecdotal evidence, eg "I once a saw a church with rainbow flags"
It's not anecdotal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominations_affirming_LGBTQ_people#United_States
There are plenty of churches who support that stuff, particular mainline churches, and plenty of Christians who don't who go go along with it. Whenever a pope publicly takes some idiotic stance, there will be legions of Catholic e-Christians either ignoring it or trying to spin it as not being that bad and insist that their religion is totally traditional.
>was somehow the procurer/bearer of that very social deprecating practice.
Its effect in preventing it is clearly overstated.
>Now find me where you believe somehow Christianity is the procurer of tranny faggots because you passed by a compromised satanic "church" with a rainbow flag?
Yeah, sure, any Christian who disagrees with your take isn't a true Christian. You're trying to sweep all the poz the churches are filled with under the rug and just pull the no true Scotsman card. Mainline Christians aren't suddenly not Christians because you disagree with them.
>Quite literally the Word says make men effeminate:
The Bible also says to sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, renounce your family in favor of Rabbi Jesus, encourages celibacy (and possibly full-blown eunuchism) and discourages marriages, discourages swearing oaths, and promotes women covering their heads in church. There's lots of stuff in there nobody follows. Why have Christians engaged in armed struggles instead of turning the other cheek or submitting to the ruling authorities that Romans claims are ordained by Yahweh? How many people do you think really believe in all the nonsense about Adam and Eve or Noah's ark? Raging e-crusaders also don't seem to care at all about loving their enemies and praying for those who persecute them.
>modern day secularist "humanism",
The ethics of "secular humanism" is largely drawn from Christian morality. Why do you think so many of those people praise Jesus but decry his fan club?
>population control, etc etc etc. My favorite part about this is how you idiots on these stupid imagehosting sites feel that the new secularist ideology that a fellow basement dweller thought up will now be the cure all for all social ills.
Abrahamism is an impediment the white race. Ask even a "redpilled" Christian" whether they would have an all-white country or a non-white Christian country, and the overwhelming majority will choose the latter. Or ask them if they'd rather have their children marry white nonbelievers or black Christians and see how they'd answer. It's time to grow up and lose the kike fairy tales. They do nothing but redirect the instincts of conservatively oriented people toward philosemitic slave morality and putting belief in ancient Hebrew superstitions above all else.

I would have much less of a problem with Christians if they'd quit trying to co-opt right-wing sentiment and white racialist politics and driving it off a cliff while attacking anyone who has a problem with it. They're never satisfied unless they're pushing their idiotic beliefs on everyone else and then crying about being oppressed when people tell them to fuck off. Back in the early days of /pol/ people had way less patience for Christfag antics.
>Then there's your terrible argument of "it's a sinking ship" Literally a culture of God, that has lasted eons, is somehow to replaced by your edgy fedora library of recently acquired political movements, will supersede the mandates of God Himself.
Sure, the Jewish god Yahweh is the creator of the universe because the Jews wrote books where they told us so.
>Very well Karl Marx, please tell us more when you're done jacking off to cartoon ponies.
Who said anything about Marxism? You're really grasping at straws.
>Or will you regurgitate the old Nordic fetishism (which Hitler himself thought was silly) or for National Socialism which you build as an altar to your new saviors?
Rebuilding continuity with traditional European culture should be encouraged. It's time to stop denigrating our ancestors from before the imposition of Christianity on Europe as evil "pagans" and to accept that there's nothing wrong with non-Jewish worldviews. We can't go back to pre-Christian times, but we can move forward to post-Christian times and feature the overcoming of Abrahamic superstition as part of our story as a civilization.
>And for your information, yes they are non-Christian. You can't suddenly throw the spine, Jesus Christ/God, out of the window and then establish yourself somehow as a "Christian" church.
Religions are a social phenomenon defined about as much by community and lineage as they are by checking boxes on a list of particular beliefs. Their flavor of Christianity might not be the Christianity of a century ago, but the Christianity of a century ago wasn't the Christianity of a century before that.

>It's like you claiming the last woman who left you for a street hoodlum with sagging pants and dreadlocks, is somehow still your girlfriend.
I don't see the problem. Sounds like a godly relationship. She deserves to be forgiven and welcomed back with open arms.
>>174516
>anti-trans hysteria
The boomers who raise such a fuss over issues like trannies in women's goyball are annoying, but don't act like trannies are innocent little victims. They're vicious self-aggrandizers who deserve most of the pushback they get.
>The Jewish candidate
Are you really stupid enough to think there's only one?

>>174506
>>174514
seethe

>>174517
>Yeah, sure, any Christian who disagrees with your take isn't a true Christian. You're trying to sweep all the poz the churches are filled with under the rug and just pull the no true Scotsman card. Mainline Christians aren't suddenly not Christians because you disagree with them.

That's not a no true scotsman, that's actual REQUIREMENTS! You can't call yourself a marine without actually signing up and going through bootcamp. You can't be a airline pilot without the proper training. If you're a dumbass who can't even fly a paper kite and you walk into a terminal claiming to be a pilot, then you are not. That's not a no true scotsman clause, THAT'S ACTUAL FACT. You can't claim to be a legitimate Christian Christ-fearing church and you're allowing a troon on the pulpit or promoting faggotry lifestyle. It's a fake church. And it's put up there for a reason. Christians and the Church are the target. Satan is not mad at you fedoras. You're doing his work, whether you believe in him or not. He's mad at Christians because they perform resistance and offense against his kingdom.

>The Bible also says to sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, renounce your family in favor of Rabbi Jesus, encourages celibacy (and possibly full-blown eunuchism) and discourages marriages, discourages swearing oaths, and promotes women covering their heads in church. There's lots of stuff in there nobody follows. Why have Christians engaged in armed struggles instead of turning the other cheek or submitting to the ruling authorities that Romans claims are ordained by Yahweh? How many people do you think really believe in all the nonsense about Adam and Eve or Noah's ark? Raging e-crusaders also don't seem to care at all about loving their enemies and praying for those who persecute them.

And to summarize this, you basically took the Jack Black route of "Oh it says the same about this seafood cocktail". Your version basically said "Hey listen, I'm the neckbeard who googles contradictions in the bible and thinks that I'm a legitimate biblical scholar. Thus this doesn't make any sense to me and that doesn't make any sense to me, so why bother following any of it eh?" It's the logical fallacy of society today. And it's one big excuse. I can't bash you over the head anymore with clear black and white text:
Romans 1:27
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.

Romans 1:26-27
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:

1 Timothy 1:10
the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,

Jude 1:7
just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.

If you're going to find an excuse to ignore in order to continue on with your debunked claim, there's nothing I can do.


>I don't see the problem. Sounds like a godly relationship. She deserves to be forgiven and welcomed back with open arms.
This is what atheists believe and the reason why Christianity will never suit you cuckold types. You have a distorted view of Godly wisdom and thus it will never apply to your life. Husbands marry their wives. This is opposition to your atheist world view of, don't get married, have as little sex as possible, then have the men blame the women, and the women blame the men. You end up hideous looking monstrosities of fat disgusting misandrist for the women, and fat disgusting misogynists for the men.

>Rebuilding continuity with traditional European culture should be encouraged. It's time to stop denigrating our ancestors from before the imposition of Christianity on Europe as evil "pagans" and to accept that there's nothing wrong with non-Jewish worldviews. We can't go back to pre-Christian times, but we can move forward to post-Christian times and feature the overcoming of Abrahamic superstition as part of our story as a civilization.
Okay Viking raiding set Europe back further. They were advancing despite the collapse of the Roman Empire. Vikings actually kidnapped white europeans and sold them to Arabs. The Arab was also highly hostile where they had numerous jihads (in the hundreds) against Europe. This is addition to the Viking raiding and attacks that destroyed much of the books and knowledge in places like monasteries, as well as terrorizing the country side and commerce and advancement. But this is the bullshit your average virgin pimply faced larper will deny.

>Who said anything about Marxism? You're really grasping at straws.
I mentioned Karl Marx because he was yet another scumbag atheist/satanist who wanted to dispel Christianity in favor of some New/Old "best thing since sliced bread" type of social order. Much like your people do whenever you make threads like this.

>Sure, the Jewish god Yahweh is the creator of the universe because the Jews wrote books where they told us so.
The original people on earth were not Jews friend. The original Jews only were branded as such because of one individual who showed complete obedience and thus due to that had his line chosen to be first covenant carriers. When Jesus Christ walked and died and rose on the earth, everyone had that power, even more so. You can brand a Being of omnipotence a specific religion when He pretty much created even the fat larper fags who don't even believe in HIm.

>>174519
Cuckoldry is against Biblical law and condemned by the Lord Christ. Cuckoldry is basically a form of faggotry and faggotry can only be for Russians.

>>174506
They call her Ms. Blackcock.

>>174522
This poster is a fed

>>174515
There are definitely still younger whites who do, but largely I think their interest is driven more by memes and political posturing leading them to shill for a religion they misunderstand. They're just falling into the bagelian dialectic trap instead of realizing that Christianity is just another Jewish scam.
>>174521
>That's not a no true scotsman, that's actual REQUIREMENTS! You can't call yourself a marine without actually signing up and going through bootcamp. You can't be a airline pilot without the proper training. If you're a dumbass who can't even fly a paper kite and you walk into a terminal claiming to be a pilot, then you are not. That's not a no true scotsman clause, THAT'S ACTUAL FACT. You can't claim to be a legitimate Christian Christ-fearing church and you're allowing a troon on the pulpit or promoting faggotry lifestyle. It's a fake church. And it's put up there for a reason. Christians and the Church are the target.
No, Christianity is just a particular religion oriented around the figure of Jesus. It doesn't necessitate certain stances around secondary or tertiary issues. Different types of Christians put different emphases on different parts of the Bible, and many believe that with enough exegetical elbow grease they can make it mean whatever they want (whether their cases are actually convincing or not is another matter). Back in the earliest days of Christianity, before the proto-orthodox faction obtained power and was able to successfully crack down on dissenters, there was arguably even more variety than we have in churches today.
>Satan is not mad at you fedoras. You're doing his work, whether you believe in him or not. He's mad at Christians because they perform resistance and offense against his kingdom.
Satan is a fictional character created by Jews. Europeans shouldn't concern themselves with believing in Jewish myths that demonize them and their ancestors.
>It's the logical fallacy of society today.
It's not fallacious. It's true. Cafeteria Christianity is the norm, and that's not surprising given how wacky and upside-down a lot of Biblical morality is. The condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is just one more thing in a long line of doctrines that's being thrown out.
>If you're going to find an excuse to ignore in order to continue on with your debunked claim, there's nothing I can do.
I never said there weren't anti-homosexuality passages in the Bible. Socially conservative stances in the Bible don't necessarily translate into real-world stances in the church though. Christianity isn't some magic bullet against social liberalism, and its totally foundationally philosemitic and racially egalitarian values completely invalidate anything positive it might have to offer along with all the harmful superstitions.
>This is what atheists believe and the reason why Christianity will never suit you cuckold types. You have a distorted view of Godly wisdom and thus it will never apply to your life. Husbands marry their wives. This is opposition to your atheist world view of, don't get married, have as little sex as possible, then have the men blame the women, and the women blame the men. You end up hideous looking monstrosities of fat disgusting misandrist for the women, and fat disgusting misogynists for the men.
Endless forgiveness is an idea much closer to the heart of Christianity than it is to being nonreligious.

Fewer and fewer people are truly following The Goat Herder's Guide to the Galaxy or the religion built around its claims, so it would be wise of you to anchor your social conservatism in something other than ancient myths that aren't convincing to anyone who doesn't already buy into them.
>Okay Viking raiding set Europe back further. They were advancing despite the collapse of the Roman Empire. Vikings actually kidnapped white europeans and sold them to Arabs. The Arab was also highly hostile where they had numerous jihads (in the hundreds) against Europe.
I'm not going to justify Viking raids or their slave trading of fellow Europeans. What's worth celebrating about them is their adventurous spirit, and talents for navigation, and the resistance to Christianity of people like Haakon Jarl. That doesn't mean they should be overly romanticized.

Now why don't you give some criticism to Christians like the crusaders who were spreading their religion by the sword and slaughtering their fellow Europeans in the name of a Middle-Eastern god?
>This is addition to the Viking raiding and attacks that destroyed much of the books and knowledge in places like monasteries, as well as terrorizing the country side and commerce and advancement. But this is the bullshit your average virgin pimply faced larper will deny.
So they were doing basically the same thing Christians had done earlier by neglecting or even destroying ancient "pagan" literature that they viewed as being at odds with their sad Semitic cult?
>I mentioned Karl Marx because he was yet another scumbag atheist/satanist
Satanist? You're full of crap.
>who wanted to dispel Christianity in favor of some New/Old "best thing since sliced bread" type of social order.
Marx's religious views were a bit more complex than you're making them out to be. I don't necessarily think he was out to abolish religion the way his later followers would be. He seemed to view religion as a way for the oppressed masses to cope with deeply unsatisfactory living conditions.

Besides that, Marx's stance on religion was less influential than the other aspects of his political and economic ideology. Comparing someone to Marx for taking issue with Christianity would be like comparing someone with vegetarian tendencies to Hitler.
>Much like your people do whenever you make threads like this.
Getting rid of the influence of Christianity isn't some panacea, but it's a necessary part of a broader program.
>The original people on earth were not Jews friend. The original Jews only were branded as such because of one individual who showed complete obedience and thus due to that had his line chosen to be first covenant carriers.
There was almost certainly no "covenant," and your Torah is fiction. There's very little chance any of patriarchs ever existed in the first place.
>When Jesus Christ walked and died and rose on the earth
I'll take "things that never happened" for 500, Alex.
>You can brand a Being of omnipotence a specific religion when He pretty much created even the fat larper fags who don't even believe in Him.
Why is someone a LARPer for not believing in the magical Rabbi Yeshua Hamashiach, King of the Jews? What does a crucified kike have to do with me?
>>174522
>Cuckoldry is against Biblical law and condemned by the Lord Christ.
Isn't he the son of his mom's bull?

>>174543
>first pic
We are almost free, bros.

>>174553
It's a 2022 Mr Aztec Man, you're probably over 50% by now. Next time you rip a cholo's heart out to the corn god, you can pour one out for your homies on finally getting over it.

>>174553
and what has gotten better since

>>174576
Let's break this story down:

>sexually abusing a child
>this "child" was months from being legal in West Virginia
>she came back on multiple occasions for more "abuse"

>>174578
That fucking slut, seducing that poor gentlemen for years!

>>174581
They say he abused her, you say she seduced him, the reality must be somewhere in the middle, two humans seeking mutual pleasure in this weary world, albeit forbidden.

>>174641
Chinese kids think Americans eat people because of Epstein lol

He fucked more women than us and he doesn't have a dick.

>>174941
Something wrong with you video encoding, anon, the audio is missing.

>>174941
>they all say 50s
Staged. I don't think it's that bad.

>>174968
Is it better ?

>>175037
There you go, I knew you could do it!