No.167373
>>167372Is any of that actually in the newly released files, or did it just come out of your demented mind?
No.167375
>>167373nah i actually made it all the fuck up lol
but here's the proofs anyways
No.167384
to finish up, epstein got banned from xbox live for racism (he was a f*cking gamer) and he gooned to this five nights at freddies futacock video featuring sherry birkin (she's 12 yrs old) and ada wong (she's asian and gets menko'd by a doll-thing)
https://rule34.xxx/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=4944118might post more if i bother lurking moar
No.167385
>>167384There must be a redacted file where he contacted Bill Gates to pull strings to get him unbanned from Xbox Live.
No.167386
>>167376>no Tor>types like a kindergartnerI thought he was a genius.
No.167387
Not sure if anyone else has a lead on this, but apparently the bong Prince William isn't the firstborn of King Charles, it's Prince Harry (who has been deliberately raised wrong, and the next in line after is the ex-prince Andrew, who got busted in the files too). Some power-move bullshit to take over the throne, and Diana was assassinated because she was going to squeal.
Could be some dude schizorambling, but I'll believe it if I see the Epstein logs.
>>1673861. He's a boomer, and a hubristic psychopathic one at that
2. Hilldawg's emails and hunter's laptop aren't much better
3. You don't need tor when you're the one doing the monitoring
No.167388
>>167387That's nonsense, William is clearly older than Harry, he's the firstborn son of Charles, the line of succession goes William > William's children > Harry > Harry's children > Andrew.
No.167389
>>167388No, I mean
>William isn't Charles's, Diana's first>Harry was the firstborn, Diana's second No.167396
>>167389I think you've got it backward. There is a theory that has been circulating for many years that Harry isn't Charles'. There is some dude Diana had a fling with who looks like Harry.
No.167409
I stand by my comments about the global elite being a bunch of lousy muh dick niggers who just got lucky being born nepobabies and Jeffrey Epstein himself is a prime example of that.
No.167410
>>167408Turns out TRS were more innocent than we thought when it came to fed alligations. Anglin has connections to Carlson's Dad. Weev is also an obvious mole. Reminder that Epstein was one of the literal nihilist cp posters we had to and still have to deal with on image boards.
No.167412
>>167410>nihilist cp posters we had to and still have to deal with on image boardsThat shit went mainstream with 764 and COM faggotry.
No.167413
he's Jeffrey Epicstein now
No.167414
>>167372That is fucking great, so when are they all going to jail?
No.167417
The death of Epstein proves that it's a mutual network and everyone is expendable.
No.167418
>>167416If they compromise one living party the compromise everyone that's the point.
No.167421
>>167416Apparently it's the hardcore stuff they're not supposed to show to the public, like distributing the child snuff porn Epstein manufactured, details of the survivors or the stuff they're actively investigating, and it's as much of the files they could legally release.
Naturally, 100% bullshit and there's definitely going to be secrets-within-secrets, but what we've already got does most of the heavy lifting and the competency crisis has already meant they've already accidentally included CP in what they did release (so for the schizos looking for patterns in the numbers, any major names that have been hidden probably have something in what's released). Since they released the dates with the emails too, you could probably put together a timeline and match it up with his schedule to figure out where some of the holes in the data are.
> so nobody alive gets in troublDid you doubt that in the slightest? NEH.
No.167422
*some crumbs in what's released
No.167424
>>167421>"and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy"He's revealing right then and there how it's not just the victims' PII they're hiding.
No.167428
passing thought after a day of skimming and lurking: all this shit basically just boils down to boredom above all else.
new money is pretty content with the shit they couldn't afford in their youth (hence much of it being excluded from these circles, or kept to "low-level" mega-yachts and private jets), but old money, born with everything they could ever want from the getgo, desire the only thing they cant have: an abstract [literally "anything"] they're not supposed to or are allowed to. and so they seek that "anything" high, depraved as it might be, and high off their own hubris of being born and surrounded by yes-men, and with the power to not only kill, but execute anyone who vaguely disagrees with them with their glut of intergenerational power. the new money is allowed in, but it's used as blackmail against them - the old money have nothing to fear to begin with, so indulge any change at a new high with total disregard. a desire for meaning, a desire for purpose, a desire for excitement - anything they don't have already. they're the equivalent of the same junkie retard hobos you'd kick in the street, except their great-great-great grandaddy invented something important or their clan have completely overtaken the banking system and rigged it in their favor. they're barely sapient, their ability to read and write seems poor (even before the constant drugs), they lack an inner monologue, and their obsession with animals and animalistic rituals is ironic, since their affluenza has essentially rendered them with subhuman mindsets from childhood. a few of them are smart enough to organise amongst themselves, but they're ultimately just pimps and dealers in a crowd of their own, the rest in a suspended lotus-eating malaise, and their undeserved positions of power are either "too big to fail" or just boil down to the hyper-intelligent hard-working underclass plebs doing all the work for them (and them getting all the credit) (as the way things should be: they (think they) are gods among men).
it highlights it too, because epstein lamented that, despite physically preferring swiss chicks with big tits, more lax cultural standards in yurope meant he didn't get the same highs as breaking the rules closer to the states. it's not the act, it's the consequence. if child snuff was legal and socially acceptable, they'd either move to make it illegal again to break the rules, or they'd just jack off to something else like bladetossing a dog on CoD. if scat and piss were a common delicacy, then they'd want to play with vomit and bile instead (at least inbetween the actual delicacies and billion-dollar sushi that their hardwired biology prefers, prepared for by private michelin chefs as a basic expectation). epstein hated indians for stinking and writhing in shit and ruining his fun at a resort area (a normalised cultural behavior to them), but in the /x/ whistleblower we see he would regularly engage in scat fetishism himself (breaking the rules). in fact, you could even say that the entire infiltration of the legal institutions and imposition of increasingly oppressive laws by the clique isn't even as much to torment the commoners and prevent them from socially moving upward to threaten their position (these people unironically think and have been taught all their lives that they're gods and civilisational puppeteers already, if any of them were to "fall" they'd either pull favors and be back in no time or they were unfun spergs who "deserved it") see elon wanting to be invited to the island, but repeatedly being snubbed because nobody wanted to be around him, because elon's an autistic retard faggot loser. in fact, there's probably a case where they enjoy bringing more likeminded new money people into the clique to an extent; otherwise they wouldn't have recruitment arms via celebrity status or cults (both noveau and established, silicon valley spiritual gurus and oldschool masons). even to an extent the speech laws and grasp on the internet isn't about power, is just they're so used to killing dissidents who chat shit irl, they want to export it to the one place people can still chat shit - we here are not a threat, we're an insult, to god-complex-deluded people who kill those who insult them.
rather, they create these orwellian hyperlaws to create new things they're "not allowed to do" and thus flaunt and thus masturbate and do LSD to.
essentially, the purpose of order to them is just to be there so they can ignore it. they don't want chaos / no rules, they want to break the rules. so they'll make as many rules as possible. likely why abhrahamistic demonology also appeals to them: it fulfils that spiritual niche of presenting an absolute legal and order-based authority of the desert-jew-god in the heavens watching over everything, and their patron-of-choice who diametrically undermines and opposes it but must in of itself be part of it to exist (le satandup / molochdup / baaldup etc) but is (from their point of view) the true ruler, just like how they impose order to undermine it. and why they seem to veer away from worshiping more independent chaotic trickster-type patrons.
reminds me a lot of slaanesh writing, but more boring and sigh-inducing and well-this-one-is-real-infactofcourse. there's definitely a conspiracy at play, but there's no grand design. there is no great scheme, there is no greater nefarious plan. there is no long term goal. they've already (in their eyes) won, and their win maintains itself. they're not mustache-twirling evil geniuses cooking up an ultimate scheme (the clever ones are a layer below them, thinking the even smarter ones are above them). it's just really bored and rich retard wigger / kike cokeheads looking for any new high, and deliberately sinking as low as possible to achieve it. you'd basically need to collapse the entire structure to get rid of it (your own meager and more fragile survival-based position included). the system isn't a hydra with many heads to need to "cut off to fix", the entire system as a concept is set up to work as intended, the entire thing is a rotten piece of wood. until then and unless then, the child rape and satandup bullshit and golem-creating-miscegenation and civilizational decline will continue, and nothing will happen. because everything is working exactly as intended.
scratching my balls (and taint) rn btw. dup btfo o algo.
No.167437
>>167428Great post, these people, aren't gods, and they will destroy themselves, its up to based people to grab the power and hold on for life. Pedodup btfo.
No.167442
>>167374REALLY makes you wonder if normies will ever realize they've been enabling pedophiles by promoting porn based on children franchises, same thing with Amazing Digital Circus and Gravity Falls: if children love it then expose them to porn by borrowing the same characters they're familiar with and bingo! You got your own mouth-breathing personal army! A great example is the gook from Worst Korea: minus8; who was open about his pedophilia which lots of brownoids keep defending his legacy every time his cockteasing shit is dumped at Jewtube.
No.167444
>>167442Western cartoonists purposely draw the characters as unattractive and asexual as possible so as to discourage male gaze, and to lessen the number of gooners rule 34 of it attracts. This doesn't stop gooner artists from trying. Hentai doujins and rule 34 are the opposite; the original designs of the characters are attractive.
No.167446
>>167442I think Epstein was only aware of FnaF because it was a haunted-house style game set in a haunted animatronic pizzeria (pizzagate), not because the character designs are particularly attractive (picrel). People are laughing at it specifically because it's something cringey that people would dunk on you for gooning to, and only somebody really far gone would even consider looking up (especially since it's really low quality, and isn't even the most popular pornified spinoff of FnaF, see the Frennies redesigns). In fact, FnaF was made by a pretty famously devout Catholic (Scott Cawthon), who was getting bullied because people were calling his religious edutainment games shitty, that the characters looked like animatronics, while the preachy nature of them made them feel like you needed to be older to "get them" (hence he made the first real mascot horror game, turning criticism into advice). Despite being one of the biggest indie dev success stories up there with Notch and Toby Fox, he left it all because he didn't like the way his characters were being used, and donated a ton of his earnings to charity. Also Minus8 got bullied off of the internet by a single sharteen raid, he's far from the most popular hentai artist that does some western stuff, let alone korean (who also nationally have a far bigger problem as being notorious for NTR, minus8 being a plain-vanilla saint in comparison).
Normalization of kids getting access to porn is somewhat of problem, it's basically irrelevant to the current story of a multibillionaire conspiratorial child sex-death cult, and is more related to shit normalnigger parents letting their kids do whatever unsupervised and be raised by their tablets, not because there's a concerted industry push to promote it (if anything, they're mass censoring / banning it as a justification to go after the rest of the internet and implement digital ID for "child safety"). I don't think I've seen any evidence epstein gave a shit about it past gooning to it.
Nice sentiment, but you're completely off base. Lurk moar.
No.167448
>>167447Honestly would not be suprised of Epstein knew the kike behind Blacked.com
No.167453
>>167452How shocking a jewish supremacist? All a conspiracy theory goy.
No.167454
>>167453The complete lack of action from the abundance of goyim proves him and his kind right. No one has any excuse to remain apathetic or inactive.
No.167455
>>167454No, most people being NPCs doesn't justify loxism.
No.167457
>>167456Stephen Hawking surrounded by black holes.
No.167466
>>167465>Robert Trivers was born in Washington DC, son of Howard Trivers, a Jewish-American academic and US State Department diplomat who played a key role in the denazification of post-war Germany, taking part in negotiations at the Potsdam Conference, 1947 Moscow Conference, and the 1949 Paris Conference, later involved in developing US policy related to the 1956 Hungarian Uprising and the Cuban missile crisis in 1962.[19][20][21] Growing up in a diplomatic household, Robert Trivers attended schools in Berlin, Copenhagen and Washington D.C, before attending Phillips Academy in Massachusetts and going on to study American History at Harvard.[21][22]
>Trivers met Huey P. Newton, Chairman of the Black Panther Party, in 1978 when Newton applied while in prison to do a reading course with Trivers as part of a graduate degree in History of Consciousness at UC Santa Cruz.[11] Trivers and Newton became close friends: Newton was godfather to one of Trivers's daughters.[6] Trivers joined the Black Panther Party in 1979.[12] He and Newton published an analysis of the role of self-deception by the flight crew in the crash of Air Florida Flight 90.[13] Trivers was "ex-communicated" from the Panthers by Newton in 1982 for "his own good."[14]
>Trivers, has been open about his diagnosis of bipolar disorder, which was first diagnosed when he had a manic episode at Harvard, requiring hospitalisation for several months and treatment with first generation antipsychotics.[20][22] During his recovery he developed an interest in psychology and social biology, although initially chose not to pursue this, applying to law school at Harvard and Yale; he was rejected from both, in part due to his mental health.[20][22] He went on to get a doctorate in evolutionary biology from Harvard before joining the faculty, moving to UC Santa Cruz in 1977 and Rutgers in 1994.[22] Trivers spent around 13 years living on and off in Jamaica, and has been married twice to Jamaican women.[20] As of 2016 he had five children, and eight grandchildren.[22] No.167476
>>167475Dead men tell no tales.
No.167478
>>167466Ahh how shocking that an evil kike is involved with another evil kike.
No.167481
Epstein had no opsec, he really wasn't much of a spy, but he didn't need to be since jews and their good goyim controlled so much.
No.167526
>>167488I wonder who he crossed to get his protections removed.
No.167542
>>167540Oh, who could have guessed.
No.167547
>>167540>cut but left no scarsCome on some of this is pure nonsense that has to be filtered out.
No.167548
>>167545That's one name that they would surely redact. Imagine the shitstorm if the chief jew involved in propagating miscegenational porn in the 2010s was named.
No.167549
>>167540>kike finances trooning children and beastiality pornWow I'm so shocked. Literally no one could ever have seen this coming.
No.167554
>>167550I can't believe china/russia/bestkorea/iran were the good guys all along.
No.167558
>>167550>>167554No way the non-sane countries aren't evil!
No.167559
>>167554There are no good guys on the world stage today. Brown BRICS isn't going to save us.
No.167560
>>167548I'm sure eva lovia is the key between greg and jeffrey.
She's working with trump and alex jones now. Her porn career was just the female humiliation to become a fed.
Notice how she disaperead after the first mail leak.
Maybe candice horbacz or eva lovia can be found in the mail.
No.167565
>>167562Based mike
>>167560Both whores, both should an hero like other nigged cuck stars.
No.167582
>>167578>white girlAnon, that is not a white girl, that is an inuit.
No.167584
>>167582The girl in the video is not an inuit wtf are you talking about
No.167586
>>167584She looks kind of korean but also like her parents hit in the face every day with a shovel until she resembled the shovel.
No.167587
>>167584Might be a Eskimo/Dane hapa. It would explain the lighter hair.
No.167613
>>167587that I can believe but it also must be remembered that white people are not uniform in visage and someone like me, an american, will be less familiar with danish whites in general, simply because we have very few where I live.
No.167652
>>167620The result of breeding with low IQ shitskins.
No.167678
>>167446You think there's a circlejerk of elites pushing for porn based on flavor of the month franchises that attract children? It's so fucking off-putting whenever you browse whether be DeviantArt or rule34 you get greeted by porn based on children's cartoons, specially the ones that look like ass, you scratch deeper and every lewd artist are displaying their gender pronouns or shilling their retarded leftwing trend.
No.167679
>>167678It's not that deep. It takes a childish mind to draw cartoons, nonetheless they have adult impulses.
No.167680
>>167678Yeah, as the other guy says, it's not deep, it's mostly just a combination of unchecked autism and market basics of supply and demand, with a tinge of FotM popularity waves. IIRC Chris-chan even tried to draw porn of Sonichu just because that was what itched his autismo mind; take that, and apply it to literally every other franchise that people have grown up with / will watch, as well as the general porn dopamine loop soft-training what you're "into" (aka "you are what you eat / you come to like what you cum to watch"), and you get the rise of 2D porn correlating pretty much linearly with the ability to make it and distribute it via the internet. A century ago it was Betty Boop, today it's everything from Teletubbies to Minecraft to Berzerk.
Kids getting normalized unchecked access from a way-too-early age is what's being architected and pushed, the actual cartoon porn itself is just a logical byproduct.
>rule34You do know the very meaning of that is the oldschool rules of the internet; number 34 being that if it exists, there's porn of it. I don't know what you were expecting.
No.167760
>>167758I don't know about you, but when I was a kid it wasn't a hard decision to make to choose hentai over western slop cartoons. I think if someone is whacking off to Cal Arts, they're already not playing with a full deck. Flies are attracted to shit.
No.167856
>>167854Andrew sisters…..
No.167859
>>167858It's all Kabuki theater anyhow. King Charles isn't gonna let them put his brother through too much.
No.167878
>>167859He was let free in less then a day. Not even a show trial. I wouldn't be surprised if he was never actually arrested and it was just a photo op to convince the goyim some might actually get done to the traitorous pedophiles.
No.167879
Plebs don't understand the threshold of admissible evidence
No.167880
>>167878>He was let free in less then a day.He probably posted bail, which wouldn't be a problem for somebody with his money.
No.167881
Gentiles take the fall for chosenites.
No.167898
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>167856I'm more of a Boswell Sisters man myself.
No.168012
>>167959I wish I was a winner that raped little girls with my egg shaped mutilated dick.
No.168013
>>168012It's ironic how Epstein was into eugenics and wanted to knock up a bunch of women on the premise that he was somehow a superior specimen, when in reality, he was just another dicklet, who ended up childless.
No.168016
>>168015It would also stand to reason why the west is coming apart at the seams since women were let out of the kitchen because they select males for height and cock size.
No.168018
>>168015>small penis size is correlated with high IQI don't know about that. Sounds kind of cuckpilled.
No.168019
>>168015Didyn get dat shit, u sayn am stupid fella?
No.168021
>>168020And we wonder why he did the cuck arc
No.168022
>>168020big coon dicks are beautiful, nazi. touch grass
No.168023
>>168022but they look like poopy and i'm not into scat
No.168026
Is Mr. McMahon in the Epstein Files? I thought he might be, since he's getting posted a lot ITT.
No.168028
>>168026Yeah, he is, but there's limited interactions with him, he didn't go to epsteindup island.
No.168158
>>168026Vince is a freak but i don't think he's into kids, he likes well developed women. Then again I wouldn't be surprised.
>>168028He was known to be a workaholic at WWE so likely didnt have time to fly there.
No.169894
>>169859wut?? stay mad loserino
No.170360
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>ive never met dupstein
No.173241
>>173235>m00t goes to the kike island>expect to have sex with little girls>gets raped>now wants to be a little girlReally makes you think.
No.173273
>>173235Based. Epstein deserves an award just for that!
No.173281
>>173271who wears sunglasses in a sauna?
No.173282
>>173281his vision is augmented.
No.173863
>>173846Wait… Isn't that shirt the male to female tranny thingy?
No.173866
>>173863You're thinking of the blue and pink strips. The colors on the shirt mean that they're pedophiles.
No.174478
>>174476Fedora faggots have always projected themselves on Christians, because they were your mortal enemy against you getting buttfucked by a troon. You're also jealous of the fact they have that wild sex in marriage, while you can only manage erectile dysfunction from an anime doll.
No.174481
>>174479Even your damage control sounds like something from a run of the mill troll farm. Russian bots spit better shit than that. Fear not, your virginity will never be harmed. Now go dig in your meme folder for more washed up Penn and teller pics like this is 2010.
No.174482
>>174480
>skidmark is going to hell
Checks out.
No.174483
>>174479Penn & Teller are gay jews.
No.174485
>>174481>Russian bots spit better shit than thatare you a fed?
No.174487
>>174484What's all this image macro meme shit? Is this all your arguments against American Christians? "Hey guys while I was sucking a troon dick and living my mother's basement I saw a meme were a Christian couple adopted nigger babies. Let's use this against them"
If that's the case friend, I can show you countless examples of you atheist fags and especially satanists getting bukkaked by everything from Niggers to animals. Or how about my favorite example, COMMUNISM. Our favorite atheist/satanist invention.
Keep digging in your meme folder faggot.
No.174488
>>174485You do realize you're a Kremlin sponsored Web Brigade agent and you're trying to call anyone who outs you a fed/cia/mossad/polish/ukrainian spy right?
Don't get me wrong. While fedora atheists lost the battle back in the pre-2010s, you vatnik shit eating slav faggots never had any case outside of your Kruchev style banging your shoe on a table. Or in this case crying over how innocent Putin/Russia is. Fuck off you commie cunt nugget. Get the fuck off the American internet.
And you're most likely going to get raped once your drafted btw.
No.174497
>>174491Because Green texting is an easy way to put words in someone's mouth like Putin puts his micro-penis in yours right? NO.
The irony is that you're actually attempting a gaslighting attack, when it is true you're a kremlin web brigade. Best you're a limbless vatnik working as a propagandists on multiple accounts (keeps you out the meatwave Z army), at the worst you're automated.
And it's one of the lamest defense mechanisms you incompetent and utter no good commie cock suckers deploy. Other than the typical call him an agent bullshit. You've been deploying this bullshit for the past 15 fucking years! You think we won't find out?
No.174501
>>174478>because they were your mortal enemy against you getting buttfucked by a troonThen they were a complete failure, since they did nothing from stopping their churches from getting overrun by trannies. How can those based Christians save society like they claim they can when they can't even save their own churches?
>>174481>Russian bots spit better shit than that.The Russian government is promoting the "evil godless West vs. trad Christian Russia" narrative and pushing the Abrahamic controlled dialectic dynamic.
>>174484Now this is Christpilled.
No.174502
>>174501is that an Orthodox priest beside that Jewish pride flag memorial?
No.174503
>>174501So according to polls. Actual polls, not memes you find off imageboards full of anime masturbators like yourself, the census of Christians who vehemently oppose transgenderism is approximately 87%.
This is in comparison to 67% of agnostics and 75% of Atheists who are IN FAVOR of transgender bullshit.
So for now I want you to do me a favor. I want you go back in your little internet meme folder you got from all the lonely nights you were jerking of with other men, and try to find something of actual data and sustenance.
Using cherry picking of pictures from non-Christian "churches" does not make your point.
No.174507
>>174502From what I can tell from skimming the site, it's actually a kooky Baptist church that uses Eastern Orthodox liturgy and aesthetics and promotes interfaith and LGBLTBBQ+ goofiness.
https://peacecathedraltbilisi.org/the-peace-cathedral/>>174503>the census of Christians who vehemently oppose transgenderism is approximately 87%.You're cherry picking the percentage. It's 87% of white evangelical Protestants who reportedly believe that gender is determined by sex at birth. The percentage for black Protestants is 70%, non-evangelical white protestants are 63%, and Catholics as a whole are 62% according to the Pew results.
If Christians as a whole were 87% opposed to the tranny stuff, then that would really be pathetic given that you can drive past mainline churches in small towns out in the sticks and still see them festooned with "Pride Month" decorations.
I also wonder how much of the social conservatism is due to the influence of boomers, since millennials are more socially liberal.
Clinging to Christianity as an attempt to hold back the trannies isn't going to work unless you're also willing to jettison white demographics, since Christianity's demographics are increasingly shifted to the Third World and Christianity puts religious solidarity above racial solidarity. The whole thing's a sinking ship. You can either have Christianity or a pro-white religion.
>This is in comparison to 67% of agnostics and 75% of Atheists who are IN FAVOR of transgender bullshit.It's 58% for if you look at the "religiously unaffiliated" category as a whole, but that's still too many.
Unfortunately, a lot of people who give up on religion seem to think that the problem with Christianity is that it isn't doing enough to live up to the slave morality of the Gospels and not the fact that it's self-serving Jewish superstition that promotes a negative value system.
>Using cherry picking of pictures from non-Christian "churches" does not make your point. They're not non-Christian just because they disagree with your flavor of Christianity.
>>174504Yeshua was a 6'5 blond Aryan berserker.
No.174508
>>174507Will there ever be a form of Christfaggotry that any christfaggot agrees on?
No.174513
>>174507>>174508I literally just argued with either you or some other fedora who did only cherry pick memes about how suddenly Christianity, who was the staunchest opponent against transgenderism or any other mainstream backwardness, was somehow the procurer/bearer of that very social deprecating practice. And here you are accusing me of cherry picking. Not only that in your rebuttal you offer a bunch of anecdotal evidence, eg "I once a saw a church with rainbow flags"
Quite literally the Word says make men effeminate:
>Romans 1:27>And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
>Romans 1:26-27>For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
>1 Timothy 1:10>the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,
>Jude 1:7>just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.Now find me where you believe somehow Christianity is the procurer of tranny faggots because you passed by a compromised satanic "church" with a rainbow flag?
Then there's your terrible argument of "it's a sinking ship" Literally a culture of God, that has lasted eons, is somehow to replaced by your edgy fedora library of recently acquired political movements, will supersede the mandates of God Himself. You guys remember this shit? The French Revolution, Bolsheviks, the Frankfurt school, modern day secularist "humanism", population control, etc etc etc. My favorite part about this is how you idiots on these stupid imagehosting sites feel that the new secularist ideology that a fellow basement dweller thought up will now be the cure all for all social ills. Very well Karl Marx, please tell us more when you're done jacking off to cartoon ponies. Or will you regurgitate the old Nordic fetishism (which Hitler himself thought was silly) or for National Socialism which you build as an altar to your new saviors?
And for your information, yes they are non-Christian. You can't suddenly throw the spine, Jesus Christ/God, out of the window and then establish yourself somehow as a "Christian" church. It's like you claiming the last woman who left you for a street hoodlum with sagging pants and dreadlocks, is somehow still your girlfriend.
No.174514
>>174504LOL…added to filter
No.174517
>>174508Not likely. They've been at each other's throats since the beginning of their religion.
>>174513>And here you are accusing me of cherry picking.You said it was 87% when that was only the percentage for white evangelical Protestants in particular.
>Not only that in your rebuttal you offer a bunch of anecdotal evidence, eg "I once a saw a church with rainbow flags"It's not anecdotal.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Christian_denominations_affirming_LGBTQ_people#United_StatesThere are plenty of churches who support that stuff, particular mainline churches, and plenty of Christians who don't who go go along with it. Whenever a pope publicly takes some idiotic stance, there will be legions of Catholic e-Christians either ignoring it or trying to spin it as not being that bad and insist that their religion is totally traditional.
>was somehow the procurer/bearer of that very social deprecating practice.Its effect in preventing it is clearly overstated.
>Now find me where you believe somehow Christianity is the procurer of tranny faggots because you passed by a compromised satanic "church" with a rainbow flag?Yeah, sure, any Christian who disagrees with your take isn't a true Christian. You're trying to sweep all the poz the churches are filled with under the rug and just pull the no true Scotsman card. Mainline Christians aren't suddenly not Christians because you disagree with them.
>Quite literally the Word says make men effeminate:The Bible also says to sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, renounce your family in favor of Rabbi Jesus, encourages celibacy (and possibly full-blown eunuchism) and discourages marriages, discourages swearing oaths, and promotes women covering their heads in church. There's lots of stuff in there nobody follows. Why have Christians engaged in armed struggles instead of turning the other cheek or submitting to the ruling authorities that Romans claims are ordained by Yahweh? How many people do you think really believe in all the nonsense about Adam and Eve or Noah's ark? Raging e-crusaders also don't seem to care at all about loving their enemies and praying for those who persecute them.
>modern day secularist "humanism",The ethics of "secular humanism" is largely drawn from Christian morality. Why do you think so many of those people praise Jesus but decry his fan club?
>population control, etc etc etc. My favorite part about this is how you idiots on these stupid imagehosting sites feel that the new secularist ideology that a fellow basement dweller thought up will now be the cure all for all social ills.Abrahamism is an impediment the white race. Ask even a "redpilled" Christian" whether they would have an all-white country or a non-white Christian country, and the overwhelming majority will choose the latter. Or ask them if they'd rather have their children marry white nonbelievers or black Christians and see how they'd answer. It's time to grow up and lose the kike fairy tales. They do nothing but redirect the instincts of conservatively oriented people toward philosemitic slave morality and putting belief in ancient Hebrew superstitions above all else.
I would have much less of a problem with Christians if they'd quit trying to co-opt right-wing sentiment and white racialist politics and driving it off a cliff while attacking anyone who has a problem with it. They're never satisfied unless they're pushing their idiotic beliefs on everyone else and then crying about being oppressed when people tell them to fuck off. Back in the early days of /pol/ people had way less patience for Christfag antics.
>Then there's your terrible argument of "it's a sinking ship" Literally a culture of God, that has lasted eons, is somehow to replaced by your edgy fedora library of recently acquired political movements, will supersede the mandates of God Himself.Sure, the Jewish god Yahweh is the creator of the universe because the Jews wrote books where they told us so.
>Very well Karl Marx, please tell us more when you're done jacking off to cartoon ponies.Who said anything about Marxism? You're really grasping at straws.
>Or will you regurgitate the old Nordic fetishism (which Hitler himself thought was silly) or for National Socialism which you build as an altar to your new saviors?Rebuilding continuity with traditional European culture should be encouraged. It's time to stop denigrating our ancestors from before the imposition of Christianity on Europe as evil "pagans" and to accept that there's nothing wrong with non-Jewish worldviews. We can't go back to pre-Christian times, but we can move forward to post-Christian times and feature the overcoming of Abrahamic superstition as part of our story as a civilization.
>And for your information, yes they are non-Christian. You can't suddenly throw the spine, Jesus Christ/God, out of the window and then establish yourself somehow as a "Christian" church.Religions are a social phenomenon defined about as much by community and lineage as they are by checking boxes on a list of particular beliefs. Their flavor of Christianity might not be the Christianity of a century ago, but the Christianity of a century ago wasn't the Christianity of a century before that.
>It's like you claiming the last woman who left you for a street hoodlum with sagging pants and dreadlocks, is somehow still your girlfriend.I don't see the problem. Sounds like a godly relationship. She deserves to be forgiven and welcomed back with open arms.
>>174516>anti-trans hysteriaThe boomers who raise such a fuss over issues like trannies in women's goyball are annoying, but don't act like trannies are innocent little victims. They're vicious self-aggrandizers who deserve most of the pushback they get.
>The Jewish candidateAre you really stupid enough to think there's only one?
No.174521
>>174517>Yeah, sure, any Christian who disagrees with your take isn't a true Christian. You're trying to sweep all the poz the churches are filled with under the rug and just pull the no true Scotsman card. Mainline Christians aren't suddenly not Christians because you disagree with them.That's not a no true scotsman, that's actual REQUIREMENTS! You can't call yourself a marine without actually signing up and going through bootcamp. You can't be a airline pilot without the proper training. If you're a dumbass who can't even fly a paper kite and you walk into a terminal claiming to be a pilot, then you are not. That's not a no true scotsman clause, THAT'S ACTUAL FACT. You can't claim to be a legitimate Christian Christ-fearing church and you're allowing a troon on the pulpit or promoting faggotry lifestyle. It's a fake church. And it's put up there for a reason. Christians and the Church are the target. Satan is not mad at you fedoras. You're doing his work, whether you believe in him or not. He's mad at Christians because they perform resistance and offense against his kingdom.
>The Bible also says to sell all your possessions and give the money to the poor, renounce your family in favor of Rabbi Jesus, encourages celibacy (and possibly full-blown eunuchism) and discourages marriages, discourages swearing oaths, and promotes women covering their heads in church. There's lots of stuff in there nobody follows. Why have Christians engaged in armed struggles instead of turning the other cheek or submitting to the ruling authorities that Romans claims are ordained by Yahweh? How many people do you think really believe in all the nonsense about Adam and Eve or Noah's ark? Raging e-crusaders also don't seem to care at all about loving their enemies and praying for those who persecute them.And to summarize this, you basically took the Jack Black route of "Oh it says the same about this seafood cocktail". Your version basically said "Hey listen, I'm the neckbeard who googles contradictions in the bible and thinks that I'm a legitimate biblical scholar. Thus this doesn't make any sense to me and that doesn't make any sense to me, so why bother following any of it eh?" It's the logical fallacy of society today. And it's one big excuse. I can't bash you over the head anymore with clear black and white text:
Romans 1:27
And likewise also the men, leaving the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another; men with men working that which is unseemly, and receiving in themselves that recompence of their error which was meet.
Romans 1:26-27
For this cause God gave them up unto vile affections: for even their women did change the natural use into that which is against nature:
1 Timothy 1:10
the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality, enslavers, liars, perjurers, and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine,
Jude 1:7
just as Sodom and Gomorrah and the surrounding cities, which likewise indulged in sexual immorality and pursued unnatural desire, serve as an example by undergoing a punishment of eternal fire.
If you're going to find an excuse to ignore in order to continue on with your debunked claim, there's nothing I can do.
>I don't see the problem. Sounds like a godly relationship. She deserves to be forgiven and welcomed back with open arms.This is what atheists believe and the reason why Christianity will never suit you cuckold types. You have a distorted view of Godly wisdom and thus it will never apply to your life. Husbands marry their wives. This is opposition to your atheist world view of, don't get married, have as little sex as possible, then have the men blame the women, and the women blame the men. You end up hideous looking monstrosities of fat disgusting misandrist for the women, and fat disgusting misogynists for the men.
>Rebuilding continuity with traditional European culture should be encouraged. It's time to stop denigrating our ancestors from before the imposition of Christianity on Europe as evil "pagans" and to accept that there's nothing wrong with non-Jewish worldviews. We can't go back to pre-Christian times, but we can move forward to post-Christian times and feature the overcoming of Abrahamic superstition as part of our story as a civilization.Okay Viking raiding set Europe back further. They were advancing despite the collapse of the Roman Empire. Vikings actually kidnapped white europeans and sold them to Arabs. The Arab was also highly hostile where they had numerous jihads (in the hundreds) against Europe. This is addition to the Viking raiding and attacks that destroyed much of the books and knowledge in places like monasteries, as well as terrorizing the country side and commerce and advancement. But this is the bullshit your average virgin pimply faced larper will deny.
>Who said anything about Marxism? You're really grasping at straws.I mentioned Karl Marx because he was yet another scumbag atheist/satanist who wanted to dispel Christianity in favor of some New/Old "best thing since sliced bread" type of social order. Much like your people do whenever you make threads like this.
>Sure, the Jewish god Yahweh is the creator of the universe because the Jews wrote books where they told us so.The original people on earth were not Jews friend. The original Jews only were branded as such because of one individual who showed complete obedience and thus due to that had his line chosen to be first covenant carriers. When Jesus Christ walked and died and rose on the earth, everyone had that power, even more so. You can brand a Being of omnipotence a specific religion when He pretty much created even the fat larper fags who don't even believe in HIm.
No.174522
>>174519Cuckoldry is against Biblical law and condemned by the Lord Christ. Cuckoldry is basically a form of faggotry and faggotry can only be for Russians.
No.174527
>>174522This poster is a fed
No.174543
>>174515There are definitely still younger whites who do, but largely I think their interest is driven more by memes and political posturing leading them to shill for a religion they misunderstand. They're just falling into the bagelian dialectic trap instead of realizing that Christianity is just another Jewish scam.
>>174521>That's not a no true scotsman, that's actual REQUIREMENTS! You can't call yourself a marine without actually signing up and going through bootcamp. You can't be a airline pilot without the proper training. If you're a dumbass who can't even fly a paper kite and you walk into a terminal claiming to be a pilot, then you are not. That's not a no true scotsman clause, THAT'S ACTUAL FACT. You can't claim to be a legitimate Christian Christ-fearing church and you're allowing a troon on the pulpit or promoting faggotry lifestyle. It's a fake church. And it's put up there for a reason. Christians and the Church are the target. No, Christianity is just a particular religion oriented around the figure of Jesus. It doesn't necessitate certain stances around secondary or tertiary issues. Different types of Christians put different emphases on different parts of the Bible, and many believe that with enough exegetical elbow grease they can make it mean whatever they want (whether their cases are actually convincing or not is another matter). Back in the earliest days of Christianity, before the proto-orthodox faction obtained power and was able to successfully crack down on dissenters, there was arguably even more variety than we have in churches today.
>Satan is not mad at you fedoras. You're doing his work, whether you believe in him or not. He's mad at Christians because they perform resistance and offense against his kingdom. Satan is a fictional character created by Jews. Europeans shouldn't concern themselves with believing in Jewish myths that demonize them and their ancestors.
>It's the logical fallacy of society today.It's not fallacious. It's true. Cafeteria Christianity is the norm, and that's not surprising given how wacky and upside-down a lot of Biblical morality is. The condemnation of homosexuality in the Bible is just one more thing in a long line of doctrines that's being thrown out.
>If you're going to find an excuse to ignore in order to continue on with your debunked claim, there's nothing I can do.I never said there weren't anti-homosexuality passages in the Bible. Socially conservative stances in the Bible don't necessarily translate into real-world stances in the church though. Christianity isn't some magic bullet against social liberalism, and its totally foundationally philosemitic and racially egalitarian values completely invalidate anything positive it might have to offer along with all the harmful superstitions.
>This is what atheists believe and the reason why Christianity will never suit you cuckold types. You have a distorted view of Godly wisdom and thus it will never apply to your life. Husbands marry their wives. This is opposition to your atheist world view of, don't get married, have as little sex as possible, then have the men blame the women, and the women blame the men. You end up hideous looking monstrosities of fat disgusting misandrist for the women, and fat disgusting misogynists for the men.Endless forgiveness is an idea much closer to the heart of Christianity than it is to being nonreligious.
Fewer and fewer people are truly following The Goat Herder's Guide to the Galaxy or the religion built around its claims, so it would be wise of you to anchor your social conservatism in something other than ancient myths that aren't convincing to anyone who doesn't already buy into them.
>Okay Viking raiding set Europe back further. They were advancing despite the collapse of the Roman Empire. Vikings actually kidnapped white europeans and sold them to Arabs. The Arab was also highly hostile where they had numerous jihads (in the hundreds) against Europe.I'm not going to justify Viking raids or their slave trading of fellow Europeans. What's worth celebrating about them is their adventurous spirit, and talents for navigation, and the resistance to Christianity of people like Haakon Jarl. That doesn't mean they should be overly romanticized.
Now why don't you give some criticism to Christians like the crusaders who were spreading their religion by the sword and slaughtering their fellow Europeans in the name of a Middle-Eastern god?
>This is addition to the Viking raiding and attacks that destroyed much of the books and knowledge in places like monasteries, as well as terrorizing the country side and commerce and advancement. But this is the bullshit your average virgin pimply faced larper will deny.So they were doing basically the same thing Christians had done earlier by neglecting or even destroying ancient "pagan" literature that they viewed as being at odds with their sad Semitic cult?
>I mentioned Karl Marx because he was yet another scumbag atheist/satanistSatanist? You're full of crap.
>who wanted to dispel Christianity in favor of some New/Old "best thing since sliced bread" type of social order.Marx's religious views were a bit more complex than you're making them out to be. I don't necessarily think he was out to abolish religion the way his later followers would be. He seemed to view religion as a way for the oppressed masses to cope with deeply unsatisfactory living conditions.
Besides that, Marx's stance on religion was less influential than the other aspects of his political and economic ideology. Comparing someone to Marx for taking issue with Christianity would be like comparing someone with vegetarian tendencies to Hitler.
>Much like your people do whenever you make threads like this.Getting rid of the influence of Christianity isn't some panacea, but it's a necessary part of a broader program.
>The original people on earth were not Jews friend. The original Jews only were branded as such because of one individual who showed complete obedience and thus due to that had his line chosen to be first covenant carriers.There was almost certainly no "covenant," and your Torah is fiction. There's very little chance any of patriarchs ever existed in the first place.
>When Jesus Christ walked and died and rose on the earthI'll take "things that never happened" for 500, Alex.
>You can brand a Being of omnipotence a specific religion when He pretty much created even the fat larper fags who don't even believe in Him.Why is someone a LARPer for not believing in the magical Rabbi Yeshua Hamashiach, King of the Jews? What does a crucified kike have to do with me?
>>174522>Cuckoldry is against Biblical law and condemned by the Lord Christ.Isn't he the son of his mom's bull?
No.174559
>>174553It's a 2022 Mr Aztec Man, you're probably over 50% by now. Next time you rip a cholo's heart out to the corn god, you can pour one out for your homies on finally getting over it.
No.174561
>>174553and what has gotten better since
No.174581
>>174578That fucking slut, seducing that poor gentlemen for years!
No.174968
>>174941Something wrong with you video encoding, anon, the audio is missing.
No.174970
>>174941>they all say 50sStaged. I don't think it's that bad.
No.175121
>>175037There you go, I knew you could do it!