/lit/ - Literature and Writing

>>1903
Well how about a download like then you dumb prick

Here is the Excel File. My apologies for the delay. Doesn't start until November though, so there is no time lost.

https://mega.nz/file/vRURkK7A#mWlS9s4MUO1gR38AjihoGxaj1tWlq4k3rOo7ZPu1bf0

Here is the PDF version if you cannot open the Excel file. Excel file is better to write on & look at, as it has dotted lines in the days instead of solid lines, but some dumb pricks might not be able to open it.

Enjoy!

https://mega.nz/file/vM80mCjL#pLEPMWzMlBHbRnRxDekWAWOsTiU3XNvN6QmnN2rKudA

quality

>>2052
oh i ve heard this but then you cant always have one off characters become popular so how does those who you write up as recurring fills in all of your stories "properly"? seems kinda wild without any sort solid ideas or plan…

>>2048
I tend to make a list of the main characters at the beginning, just writing down all sorts of tidbits about them; physical description, likes, dislikes, family background, etc.
This is especially useful if you don't know where the story is going or how it is going to end.

Some, or most, of these bits of background/info may not even make it into the story, but I find it is useful to have established some sort of basic character before going into the story. It makes it easy to decide where that character is going, how they would react in a certain situation if you know a little about their background.


Came across these notes J. K. Rowling made when she started writing the Harry Potter books, detailing the blood status for each character was something she thought to include from the very beginning. The empty circle symbolises a pure-blood father, the filled square a non-magical father. The Star of David symbolises the mother's blood status, while the square with an 'N' inside means a non-magical/non pure-blood mother(?). Finally the letter at the end is the house they end up in at Hogwarts (Hufflepuff, Ravenclaw, Gryffindor or Slytherin).
I could not find anyone talking about the fact that Rowling used a Star of David to symbolise the mother's blood status; is she implying that the witches and wizards are like Jews? The serpent symbolism of Slytherin is also interesting, especially since these witches and wizards are die-hard blood purists.

>>2068
You take pictures like a 90s serial killer. How many people have you killed?

>>2073
I think he merely saved the pic, anon.

>>2073
As >>2077 pointed out I did not take it myself, it comes from the Harry Potter Wiki, and from the 2001 documentary Harry Potter and Me where Rowling shows off her earliest notes before she started writing the books.
Because it is a screenshot from a 2001 documentary that is probably the best image quality out there.
http://web.archive.org/web/20211020003906/https://harrypotter.fandom.com/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_Me

No one seems to have commented on the Stars of David, or the fact that Rowling thought about the importance of the blood purity from the very beginning.
The circle around the Star might mean pure-blooded mother, while a plain Star is a Muggle mother. Still no idea what the 'N' is supposed to mean…

>>2072 that is very hilarious… i cant see how potter and king's
is related though.

Still, what do i do? how many character? how big of plots? what are the environments?

>>2075
>i cant see how potter and king's
is related though.
by being the same thing: slop

>>2076 ok sure. stil, what do i do then? climax or whatsoever, intros and exposition, how do i fill in the blanks? i cant seem to decide other than filing in names of objects but not sure how are they arranged to

Disclaimer: I have no experience writing for money or working with people who do and are successful at it.

In my opinion it's only not about how well you can write but about how well you can sell it.
You could have some awesome story and if you have no way to promote it it'll just be another work lost in the sea of self-published garbage with other gems floating around.
Find a way to cultivate an audience or find a way to get your work promoted by a publisher. Best ideas I can give.

>>2042
ok, some question:
how do you cultivate audience usually?
and in these days, what kind of "publisher" can help your writing busness… which is online now, to improve?

Submit something to the littyzine if it's worth I'll tell you the genre you need to write

>>2046
wheres littyzine

all left wing ideologies are controlled by marxists, even if they oppose marxism, they will ultimately act in a way that benefits marxists and marxism among you, once they are no longer useful as cover, they will be discarded, but only after you had been.

two of the core elements of marxism is that it requires the elimination of all non-marxist elements and that it will use any means, including grandiose acts of deception, to achieve this end.

they are a cancer that will go to any length to seek out and destroy anything that does not conform to it's very strict standards, you let them in, even a little bit, and they will metastasize and grow until you are pushed out, they cannot tolerate the existence of dissent, even if it is only limited to a small insular group in a remote and isolated location that communicates in secret, all who do not conform must be found and purged before their promised utopia can be delivered, all failures of their ideology are put down to outsiders or a lack of faith on someone's part.

the left prioritizes the most dangerous sources of dissent first if the left is coming to you for access, it means yu have been identified as a worse threat than whatever they haven't sought out yet, they will talk about acceptance and tolerance and freedom, but once they get their feet in the door, they will focus on building themselves up and then pushing you out of the space you built for yourself, look around at all the other things that gave coexistence with them a chance every time letting one in allowed them to take over, it was inevitable.

the right can tolerate a large range of disagreement, the left cannot, they are obsessed with growing their numbers, aand as their numbers grow, they develop a strict conformist ideology that eventually becomes full-blown marxism, and they become more and more fixated on purging those who disagree, do not let one of these vermin in, or you will end up swarmed by them.

do not make the mistake so many others have, you cannot inhabit the same space as these sorts of people, even the most liberal looking ones eventually turn against you once they feel the pressure to transform into their worst forms for fear of being given the same treatment they would give to you (and they fear rightly)

>>1706
damn, not good!

As with a lot of these books on the kikes, I buy them and can't read them.
They're so dense, and this whole topic is so overwhelming.
It's not a red pill. It's a red dumptruck full of dirt being poured on me at once.

>>1669
You can't really understand why the 20th century went the way it did without understand the role of its Jewish intellectual movements. I don't know how accurate the idea of Judaism as a group evolutionary strategy is, but The Culture of Critique does a good job of showing how they were all had at least some element of pursuing Jewish group interests. I'd recommend going with Jewish History, Jewish Religion by Israel Shahak first. It focuses on how Judaism has historically been aggressively self-aggrandizing and extremely hostile to outgroup members. The author was a Jewish liberal, but he was the consistent kind.

>>1708
>doesn't understand what marxism is, confuses it with communism
>doesn't understand that both marxism and communism lost 40 years ago and are now dead and buried
>thinks muh right can tolerate dissent better than muh left, because ideological content totally has something to do with ideological structure
Let me guess, american?

>>51
what if I have really ugly teeth?

For those that want to become an ubermensch:
>48 Laws of Power
>Prometheus Rising
>Convict Conditioning
>Phd of persuasion

>>78
haven't heard of prometheus rising or Phd of Persuasion. I've read 48 Laws, top tier book. Isn't Convict Conditioning only about bodyweight training? I'll take a look at it regardless.

>>78
skip the pseud shit in this (i won't tell you which are and are not) and instead read 'The Pocket Oracle and Art of Prudence'. it's much better, addresses more areas of life and scenarios, doesn't rely on forced anecdotal bloat, and has no silly sociopath larping.

If any of you have critique for my stories (Hunters in Meadowridge, Climax in Edmonton) please dont hesitate, I realized my mistake after publishing that there is no introduction to the plot, I thought I could swing it in media res but alas it turned out not as intended.

>>1715
I'm a bit too busy these days but when I get to immerse myself into the feuilleton I'll try to give some critique.

>>1715
>>1726
I just read Hunters in Meadowridge. I felt the initial part was too flowery, almost like a Norm joke where he's improvising some filler. But what comes later is great.
The last paragraph left me confused, though. There was a shot that hits the rock, and a scream. Peters gets up. Did the shot wake up the bear and cause it to eat Willem? And this will sound a bit meta, but does that make it a literal Willem scream? If so hats off to you, kek. I never thought I'd see someone managing to insert a Willem scream in a mute medium, it's amazing kek.

>>1880
So my thought process was to make a story based off a painting. So I found this one and started planning my story. The man in the cave is the devil "Lucy aka Lucifer" since my basic understanding of religion is that his existence is to corrupt souls so I used the cave as the entrance into hell. I tried to incorporate satanic animals as foreshadow, and I vaguely included the seven deadly sins. For the devil I used scripture but modified for a satanic purpose barring a few sentences. I had to throw in a backstory so when the other hunter shows up it makes sense. Willem Ill change his name to Wilhelm and steal your idea, it was unintentional on my part unfortunately traverses to the hell-side at the end and his body immolates and combusts, and cause there aint no room for pity in hell.

I read the story after a month or so and I could really touch up a lot. My entry for the next issue is a thanksgiving dinner with a Jew family.

>>1885
Very interesting. Honestly a lot of the symbolism had gone over my head, including the Lucy part or the hellhound part that should have been obvious (but discussing it with a friend he did notice both the Lucy part and the biblical themes before I had seen your reply). Did Lucy turn himself into the owl?

>>1845
Yeah to a certain extent.
>>1821
What I've found interesting is how it basically shills for Jews.
The story of Joseph in Egypt is that Jews can rule perfectly well, just not as Sultan. So in other words, they manage all the supply, get their family all the best real estate and jobs, accumulate all the wealth from good forward planning, and they'll take none of the responsibility when bad things happen because they aren't Sultan.

I mean it's like a bed time story to a child to make the child know that the parent is in charge, except we're talking about Jews and all others.

>>1844
The Gospels are quite entertaining. When you strip away so much of the cultural idea of who Jesus was, he just comes across as someone who spends his life wandering around pissing off Jews, and it's kind of funny.

There's a guy called Bruce Gore on youtube, you might want to check out.

>>1858
>10,000 hours of footage/lectures.
Gee, thanks.
lol
There's so much fucking content on his page.

>>1867
Yeah, I think he intends to cover the entire Bible, which is admirable.